KillerWolf
Possibly partially drunk
- Joined
- May 13, 2014
- Messages
- 18,661
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Patty Jenkins was hired to direct Wonder Woman on April 15. Two months later, on June 23rd, Jon Watts is hired to direct Spider-Man. Here's Devin's article:
http://birthmoviesdeath.com/2015/06/23/tom-holland-is-spider-man-jon-watt-to-direct
The second reboot of Spider-Man in five years' time, with yet another white male director, and he's excited. No mention at all of Marvel dropping the ball in light of WB hiring a female director for a major superhero tentpole.
But now, WB hires an untested white male director for The Flash, shortly after reports come out that Marvel may be hiring its first non-white director in eight years, and it's a subject of "intense scrutiny."
It bears repeating. Marvel Studios has been making films since 2008. We are in year seven. They have made twelve films. All directed by white men. Of the ten remaining Phase Three films, six of them have directors officially attached. All of them white men.
WB makes Man of Steel with Snyder. They bring him back for Batman v Superman, because he's been chosen to be the "architect" of the DCU and they wanted him to lay the groundwork for what's to come. Then they bring in David Ayer for Suicide Squad, and he goes on to assemble one of the most racially diverse casts ever seen in a superhero movie. Then, two years and three films into their plan, they hire Michelle MacLaren for Wonder Woman. And when things didn't work out with her, they selected another woman to replace her. They remained committed to that film having a female filmmaker - a point empathize by Deb Snyder not too long ago. Then James Wan, a filmmaker with Chinese heritage, is hired to direct Aquaman.
But WB is the one on blast here? Seriously? I mean Christ. Did Devin even criticize Marvel for taking this long to accomplish this? Or did he already have his pants dropped to the floor by the start of the first sentence?
That's my issue with Devin's article.
I agree with the main issue. Hollywood is in dire need of diversity amongst its filmmakers. Devin could have made this point just fine in the article (and many other articles beside it). But he just couldn't help himself by working in a shout-out to Marvel in there, as if them hiring a non-white director after so many years and so many films completely trumps everything WB has done for the sake of diversity in less than half the time and half the films.
WB/DC will always be criticized for everything, whether it has to do with production, castings or elements of plot in their films, while Marvel will always get a free pass for those same things. It's unfair, but that's how it is, and it is something I've learned to accept. I am not sure why is that the case exactly... I can only assume that when it comes to this, it does matter who "came first".
Anyway, being constantly under fire might even turn out to be a good thing in the end, as it might make WB/DC more cautious when it comes to certain things they wouldn't consider otherwise. They can't just sit back, relax and say "well it worked for Marvel, why should we bother?". I am not saying that this would necessarily be their approach, but sometimes it is a good thing to have a tough audience, as it makes you work harder in the end.