Don't worry, I don't click on it, but it's just all an opinion that holds no truth to it, and I think it's only something that does give an opinion to only make the film sound better than what it is.
So, what exactly are you implying? That I wrote an 8-part critical analysis, comparing the spider-man films, (which highlight why I believe TASM to be a superior film) even thought I didn't actually believe it?
Also; How does my opinion "hold no truth to it"? It holds plenty of truth to me, thank you very much. Remember that we aren't exactly discussing opinions about scientifically proven things, ie The world being round, or whether or not we breath air. We're talking about comic book movies, in which every person's opinion is subjective. We can state facts about story structure, plot details, acting performances, and cinematography, all day long. But none of it determines who's opinion of what is preferable/better is objectively 'right' or 'wrong'.
Whether you agree with my final opinion or not...
A) It is one that I absolutely believe. and I DID NOT write it just so I could 'fool' people into thinking the film "is better than what it is". Because I honestly felt and thought that TASM was better.
and
B) I've made a lot of good points on my blog. If you don't want to read 8 entries of something that challenges your opinion because you don't have time/don't feel like it, then fine. I can't really hold that against you. But don't dismiss an argument simply because you haven't read it. And for that matter, don't dismiss an argument you HAVE read simply because you disagree.
We all listen to what you have to say, after all.