Spider-ManHero12
Web-Slinger
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2006
- Messages
- 47,238
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 31
Yeah, I remember that, lol.I always liked the non mutant super hero tagline they had back in the early 90's
Yeah, I remember that, lol.I always liked the non mutant super hero tagline they had back in the early 90's
So does anybody else think they foreshadowed Carlie getting killed off soon in the recent issue?
I think it's very possible, tbh. I can just feel it for some reason. Maybe I'm wrong though.So does anybody else think they foreshadowed Carlie getting killed off soon in the recent issue?
JMS said:Sales on The Amazing Spider-Man since my departure. Just sayin'
Steve Wacker said:An excellent post, JMS. Out of context, out of date and full of out-of-the-blue mean.
Everyone on ASM currently respects your years on the book (and as editor Ive said so many times in interviews and in the letter column), but seriously this is about as creepy and low of a move as a former writer can pull on another group of creators (many of whom didnt have the luxury you had of ducking out of controversy).
Due to the teams hard work, ASM is still one of the best-selling, best performing comics around. And thanks to them, 130+ (on-time!) issues of ASM have come out since you left which certainly helps mitigate the softening of the ENTIRE comics market that youre apparently willing to ignore.
Yes, you are one of the bigger names in the comics industry. Congratulations. Youve earned the title.
Its a shame though that the title doesnt come with more class just sayin
JMS said:Nowhere in my post did I say word one about the current creative team. Nowhere in the post was there the sort of personal attack you engage in here. Nowhere do I characterize anyone or impugn their motives or integrity. I was simply passing along raw numbers, which you do not actually refute, you simply yell at me for posting them and call names and engage in other essentially churlish behavior. In regards to ducking out of controversy, I would like to know what that refers to as I have never stepped away from either controversy or sharing my opinion.
I have always made it very clear that when I came aboard ASM I brought Peter and MJ back together because I liked writing them as a married couple. I made equally clear that the decision to unmarry them and, in the same brushstroke, eliminate virtually every story Id written during those eight years was an editorial mandate, not my choice. I wouldve been happy to continue writing them married until the sun went out. Marvel wanted to unmarry them. Thats your choice, and your right. At no point did I duck out of anything. If you think I did, back it up: what are you referring to?
I posted numbers. Nothing more or less. If those numbers are correct, and again you do nothing to say otherwise then your reaction is simply mean-spirited diversion. If those numbers are not correct, provide what you consider to be accurate ones. I am more than happy to have them posted here.
In the course of this, I received a friendly, measured note from Dan Slott, who is a terrific writer, who asked if I had any problems with the current creative team. Ill tell you what I told him: I have no problem with them/him whatsoever. Dan is a terrific writer and is doing great work. I happened to come across this chart, and passed it along. Beginning, middle and end of story.
At NO point did I engage in the kind of attacking, spiteful, mean-spirited characterization you did above. Its unfortunate that one of Marvels editors comports himself in this fashion, but it happens.
If you choose to continue the conversation, please try to do so in a grown-up fashion, as did Dan Slott. You might find it a refreshing change.
Steve Wacker said:Starting my weekend off right!
My mistake Apparently when you wrote Just saying you meant Just sayin the books in good shape and I wish the team well.
JMS, I dont know you beyond a couple of brusque hellos, so I dont have a lot of heat wrapped up in this fight as you seem to imagine. Certainly no ones yelling or calling you names as you suggest. You posted something passive aggressive at best and it deserves a response. (I agree that Im bad at passive aggressive, so thats on me. Clarity is my curse.)
One thing we agree on here is that Dan Slott is a good guy who wants to do well. It was nice he reached out to a guy trying to make the argument the book was tanking. I dont know that I would have reached out to you privately since A) I hardly know you and B) you posted this publicly.
At the bottom of it all, though, youve posted an absolutely incorrect chart that isnt based on real numbers and leaves out many individual issues to make its point. The sales chart you posted is the fictional fantasy fantasy of a blogger who has a massive, medically enhanced hate for the comic and the people at Marvel. In the past has cracked about wanting to punch Dan Slott in the face among many other vile and sometimes violent remarks about everyone on the comic.
(He VIOLENTLY hates you too, for what its worth. And youve now fanned his flame something fierce.)
However, in the end, thats just derangedthough impotent fan cranking and moaning. More over the top than most, but were all used to that and deal with it regularly.
Whats more important is that, as I clearly said in the last post, his numbers are absolutely wrong, out of date and out of context.
You seem to somehow read that as me not refuting the numbers. Let me say it plainly then I refute the numbers. I even REFUDIATE them. I even REFUDIUDIUDIUDIPUDIATE them. (You are better with words than me, so if theres something stronger, please use it in the previous sentence.) Hope that clears it up.
Yes, individual sales are on average lower than when you wrote the book. Thats true. You are without a doubt one of the top writers in comics. Once again, I concede that point so congrats on that. Ive long said so in the comic and in interviews that we all knew sales were going to go down once a top writer in comics left (especially after such a controversial story like OMD).
So to come in to show off how sales have gone down after you left seems to be needlessly spiking the football after the other team has set up for the next kickoff. You already won the point.
(I will happily write JMS IS ONE OF THE TOP WRITERS IN COMICS on a fan at the next convention if you want. It is just that true!)
BUT and its a big but weve also published over 4 times as many issues of ASM as we would have otherwise in a market that has weakened considerably since you were writing Civil War tie-ins. Amazing Spider-Man is still consistently and safely among the industrys top sellers.
Since youve left, my writers and artists have managed to create the highest selling single issue in 15 years (which was purposefully left off the chart youre brandishing) and add over 40 collections to the Spider-Man backlist.
Thats important information. And it puts those fake sales numbers youre crowing about in context.
When the former heavyweight champion writer of a book shows up chiding my books sales with a ridiculously unfactual, cartoonish chart it sends a message to everyone that the book is somehow doing worse than when you were on it. You can see some of the responses here for just how well that worked out for you. If you say, you didnt mean it that way, thats great.
However, if trying to show up the current people on the book WASNT your intention, I cant imagine what it was. Just sayin
You are correct that I do take it personally when other creators knock the work my team does on any of my books (except Daredevil swing away there. Those guys are jerks.). I stand by the notion that posting a comics sales after youve left is a creepy thing to do.
Just as a mental test, try imagining if I did the obvious thing here and posted say current Superman and Wonder Woman sales now that you left the book.
That would be buttheaded of me. And I try not to be buttheaded.
I did love your ASM run, though (except the Gwen thing ewww). Especially loved Doom at the airport and the way you wrote Pete and MJ as a couple. (I also thought it was cool that we used you in Thor. They didnt use Slott in the Spidey musical which I believe was a huge mistake!)
Scarlet Spider #1 on sale January 4!
Dan Slott said:Hugs for everyone. *hugs*
Mark Waid said:Dick move, Joe. Flat out, a dick move, and you know it. Either your point was to show people how awesome you were, or to show people how things have deteriorated since your absence. Theres no other way to interpret your post. None. Are you really that hard up for approbation and fan love that you cant rise above that sort of ****? I understand Wackers frustration. Maybe he overreacted a bit, in the way good friends DO react when they perceive their friends and employees being attacked by a bitter man with a bottomless ego, but you made the first move, and it was a dick move. And if anyone doubted you were doing it for anything other than informational purposes, adding Just sayin was the snarktacular icing on the cake. No one says Just sayin unless theyre doing exactly the opposite of Just sayin
Half an hour later, still fuming at JMSs ****** passive-aggressiveness. I should probably go walk it off. Maybe with a long walk. A long, dull, pointless, boring walk. Across America.
That I wont finish.
xxx
Waid's last comment...hilarious!![]()




Really? Well, what bookes are you still reading besides those?I'm dropping Venom and ASM in February because of this over shipping nonsense. It's just not affordable.