PyroChamber
Not lactose, it's milk!
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2002
- Messages
- 15,234
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 58
Have any of the reviews so far said what they didn't like in the movie? That is from the critics who don't hate comic book movies.
I read heavy Age of Ultron spoilers... If true (i say true)... OMG OMG![]()
One thing that keeps bugging me... if Tony's hulkbuster is as strong as it appears ... why not use it against ultron as well? Maybe it's damaged beyond repair? ... if it's not, it will be odd if he doesn't use it...

Oh he actually says that???? I haven't seen it.
The reactions on this movie are some of the most oddball I've seen in a while. They're all like a laundry list of negative criticisms, followed up by "but it was still GREAT! 4/5!"
He says "I cant fisically throw up in my mouth, but still..."
There is nothing wrong with that line. Its sarcastic.


Are most of the early reviews saying the villain is weak? I've seen some early reviews but not a lot.
23 hours you guys. Less than a day. So keen!

We'll have a separating Review thread in a few days.I'm getting so confused with these reactions...
We'll find out where he ranks in the pantheon of supervillains when we see it. I cant answer that until I see the entire movie.
I expect ULTRON to be one of the MCU's best villains. If he isnt Ill say so.
where the villain is from has nothing to do with it. Its their personality and uniqueness that makes them great. Loki had an interesting personality so we all dug him. Are you saying James Spader cant be a great villain? I disagree.
also please dont claim YOU know what the GA likes or wants. Thats a load of BS.
Can put them in the spoiler thread if you want. Some people have already seen the film and have been answering everything in the last few days.I read heavy Age of Ultron spoilers... If true (i say true)... OMG OMG![]()
Sadly, I know nothing about the comics or Ultron, but just reading the synopsis of the guy, I wasn't impressed. I pointed this out once before somewhere in the threads, how I am far more part of the general audience than most around here, and that it's going to be hard to sell a mere robot after the likes of Loki (we find interstellar, outerspace or other worldly enemies to be of a greater threat than a mere earthling robot) and I got laughed off the forum. As part of the GA, I can say we already see stuff like this, in Irobot, Eagle Eye and the Terminator movies. So don't be surprised if the GA isn't taking onto this new villain. But then again, this is Marvel, and it's a well known fact that they have pretty weak villains compared to stuff we see in the DC universe.
EASY guys, EVERYONE has their own opinions. We' will see what the GA says when the movie hits the screenswhere the villain is from has nothing to do with it. Its their personality and uniqueness that makes them great. Loki had an interesting personality so we all dug him. Are you saying James Spader cant be a great villain? I disagree.
also please dont claim YOU know what the GA likes or wants. Thats a load of BS.
The only one's being mishandled are the ones FOX has. Doom was no WAY the character he was supposed to be. Galactus was something pepto bismal could beat.It's not hard to be one of top 3 MCU villains when most of them are terrible
I'm so worried about Ultron since I have heard many characters are getting mishandled