Mandated from up high maybe?T"Challa;23095771 said:Here is a review from Access Hollywood. He ggives it a fresh rating on RT but the review seems largely negative. Weird. A few spoilers in there
http://www.accesshollywood.com/moviemantz/moviemantz-review-marvels-the-avengers_articletab_64014
LOL that David Edelstein review. He thinks the Chitauri are an Armada from Asgard
And yeah he loved the movie of course, but still got that wrong.
Apologies if this got posted earlier, but Travers' full review is up at Rolling Stone.com now:
http://www.rollingstone.com/movies/reviews/the-avengers-20120430
It's just glorious.
Apologies if this got posted earlier, but Travers' full review is up at Rolling Stone.com now:
http://www.rollingstone.com/movies/reviews/the-avengers-20120430
It's just glorious.
Let me sprint right to the point: The Avengers has it all. And then some.
It's also the blockbuster I saw in my head when I imagined a movie that brought together the idols of the Marvel world in one shiny, stupendously exciting package.
All hail the warrior king of this dizzying, dazzling 3D action epic.
Whedon stages the most exultantly good-humored, head-on, rousing series of traps and escapes since Spielberg was a pup. It's Citizen Kane for Citizen Geek.
You can't get much more blurb-tastic than this review.
Heh. You get the drift. Thank you, Mr. Travers. Thank you.
The Avengers is Transformers with a brain, a heart and a working sense of humor.
Shameless trolling from a man whose hero is Armond White:
http://www.colesmithey.com/reviews/2012/04/marvels-the-avengers.html
They just haven't added the blurb from that Cole Smithey review posted above. It'll show up shortly.
You can't get much more blurb-tastic than this review.
Heh. You get the drift. Thank you, Mr. Travers. Thank you.
It brought it down to 96.So I'm guessing that it will go down to 95 again huh? that sucks![]()