Jake_Snake
Civilian
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2018
- Messages
- 256
- Reaction score
- 83
- Points
- 13
How did Hela know the gauntlet was fake?
it says made in china
How did Hela know the gauntlet was fake?
Thanos isn't a human, though
This.
Anatomy and physiology of an non terran humanoid creature would not be likely even in our real world science to follow what we know happens to us humans.
So in a fictional universe derived from comics where almost everyone had muscle defintion only seen in body building contests it's easy for him to have a perfectly symmetrical body.
Makes sense that his body would be a damn near perfect physical specimen. He is a Titan and a godlike being.
Because he is. Hes mad and ruthless but he clearly has a code of honor.
it says made in china
The actual answer is the first Thor movie showed an Infinity Gauntlet on Asgard and it was later retconned.
Avengers 4: Hawkeyes Revenge. That would be one way to kill the buzz, lol.Gonna be real awkward if that's Hawkeye's farm
I completely understand that rationale for it, but sometimes imperfections help sell the illusion of CGI being more real. For instance, the effects on the Outriders in this film were excellent. The fact that they had blotchy skin inspired by certain real life mammals helped sell the illusion of their skin texturing and tactile appearance in the film.
I'm just saying that, upon reflection, I think the realism of Thanos' physique would have benefited from similar imperfections. They incorporated them into things like his finger nails and arm hairs, which goes a long way to selling his CGI in close-ups. I'm just saying that in wide shots, similar imperfections in muscle shape and size would only add to the CGI as well.
As Brutikus mentioned, the physiques of comic book superheroes are based on top level professional bodybuilders. All of them have these sort of imperfections. I was thinking about the slight differences between Arnold Schwarzenegger's arms during his peak in the 1970s. Despite being about as perfectly built as a human being can be, his famous biceps (and most other muscles) were slightly different in shape and size. These sort of imperfections are invisible to most, but they add an additional layer of realism. As I said, it is a tiny nitpick.
There's a spoiler talk on Double Toasted.
DT mention Scarlet Witch's changed accent. They said that she got the Rosetta Stone.
I completely understand that rationale for it, but sometimes imperfections help sell the illusion of CGI being more real. For instance, the effects on the Outriders in this film were excellent. The fact that they had blotchy skin inspired by certain real life mammals helped sell the illusion of their skin texturing and tactile appearance in the film.
I'm just saying that, upon reflection, I think the realism of Thanos' physique would have benefited from similar imperfections. They incorporated them into things like his finger nails and arm hairs, which goes a long way to selling his CGI in close-ups. I'm just saying that in wide shots, similar imperfections in muscle shape and size would only add to the CGI as well.
As Brutikus mentioned, the physiques of comic book superheroes are based on top level professional bodybuilders. All of them have these sort of imperfections. I was thinking about the slight differences between Arnold Schwarzenegger's arms during his peak in the 1970s. Despite being about as perfectly built as a human being can be, his famous biceps (and most other muscles) were slightly different in shape and size. These sort of imperfections are invisible to most, but they add an additional layer of realism. As I said, it is a tiny nitpick.
I agree that Thanos arms look too sculpted but then I see Hemsworths arms and then I shut up.
I haven't seen noticeable asymmetry in the muscle sizes and shapes of lifters and buildings. asymmetry in the vascularity and skin yes but size and shape? and to a noticeable level?
Why did wong completely bottle it and go home when strange was taken?
Why did wong completely bottle it and go home when strange was taken?
The other sanctums had to be protected.
Translation: There was no further role/need for him in IW.
I completely understand that rationale for it, but sometimes imperfections help sell the illusion of CGI being more real. For instance, the effects on the Outriders in this film were excellent. The fact that they had blotchy skin inspired by certain real life mammals helped sell the illusion of their skin texturing and tactile appearance in the film.
I'm just saying that, upon reflection, I think the realism of Thanos' physique would have benefited from similar imperfections. They incorporated them into things like his finger nails and arm hairs, which goes a long way to selling his CGI in close-ups. I'm just saying that in wide shots, similar imperfections in muscle shape and size would only add to the CGI as well.
As Brutikus mentioned, the physiques of comic book superheroes are based on top level professional bodybuilders. All of them have these sort of imperfections. I was thinking about the slight differences between Arnold Schwarzenegger's arms during his peak in the 1970s. Despite being about as perfectly built as a human being can be, his famous biceps (and most other muscles) were slightly different in shape and size. These sort of imperfections are invisible to most, but they add an additional layer of realism. As I said, it is a tiny nitpick.