Eddie Dean
Jokerfied
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2005
- Messages
- 17,380
- Reaction score
- 11,891
- Points
- 103
Just make it a straight Drive reunion. Gosling as Batman, Cranston as Gordon and Ron Perlman as Bullock. Perfect.
All things that can be changed through acting and physical alterations. Dismissal based on surface value traits isn't so smart for those with talents that exceed just 'good'. Make no mistake, the likes of Gosling is going to either be a huge mega-star or an indie powerhouse. Possibly both. He'd be an inspired choice and fitting successor. He's cut from the same exact cloth as Bale, while retaining that energetic youth, dashing looks, and flawless physique. There's more good in casting Gosling than there is bad.I love Ryan Gossling (no homo), he's the coolest guy there is, but he's wrong for Batman. Too soft spoken, New York-ish accent, blonde, etc.
To follow up an Oscar-winner with these types of TV actors would be a genuine disgrace.I'm still sticking with my choices for Batman: Jeffrey Dean Morgan and Jensen Ackles.
All things that can be changed through acting and physical alterations. Dismissal based on surface value traits isn't so smart for those with talents that exceed just 'good'. Make no mistake, the likes of Gosling is going to either be a huge mega-star or an indie powerhouse. Possibly both. He'd be an inspired choice and fitting successor. He's cut from the same exact cloth as Bale, while retaining that energetic youth, dashing looks, and flawless physique. There's more good in casting Gosling than there is bad.
To follow up an Oscar-winner with these types of TV actors would be a genuine disgrace.
At the very least nab someone who has the potential to be a true acting phenom if they haven't broken through yet. Sorta like where Bale was at when he got cast.
Because he's arguably the best talent in his age bracket and can literally do anything. His range is remarkable, and you can find traces of all facets of Batman's character in at least one of his roles. I haven't seen one concrete fact going against Ryan for something like this. The guy's filmography speaks volumes.He doesn't fit the character whatsoever. How is that "inspired" casting? Ryan would make a much better GL or Flash.
I said nothing of Oscar nominations, so I don't know where you got that assumption. I called them TV actors because that's how far their talent is really suitable for; fine for the small screen.JDM and Jensen are fantastic actors, and I think if given the proper project, can make it real big. Jensen especially since he's still young.
Not giving him a chance just because he hasn't been nominated for an Oscar is stupid. If the talent is there, why not?
Just make it a straight Drive reunion. Gosling as Batman, Cranston as Gordon and Ron Perlman as Bullock. Perfect.
Just make it a straight Drive reunion. Gosling as Batman, Cranston as Gordon and Ron Perlman as Bullock. Perfect.
Bale has a slim structure as well. These masks are always conformed specifically to the actor's face, so I don't think it would be an issue a tall.Gosling is a superb talent, and you wouldn't hear me complaining if he was cast.
His hair would be a simple dye job, and he could pack on a few more pounds in muscle. The only thing that really throws me with him is his slim facial structure. I'm having a hard time picturing him in the cowl.
He's committed to Logan's Run, which will be Refn's first major blockbuster if it gets made. Gosling seems to gravitate towards a director and script rather than the budget or genre. I don't see him considering Batman unless WB gets someone of Nolan's caliber to helm the franchise.Still, I wouldn't count on it happening. Gosling is cut from a similar cloth to Daniel Day-Lewis. He has expressed little-to-no desire to branch out into mainstream Hollywood films. He seems perfectly content with his independent film career.
No need in restricting themselves again. Defeats the purpose of a reboot if you're going to confine yourself to a road Nolan has paved.While I think plenty of these choices of faces I never saw before interesting and could work very well, some shouldn't be cast for their selected roles
The new reboot needs to lose the feel of a reboot, so already used villains -especially dead ones- should not be used (i.e Ras AlGhul, Two-Face), and keep the realistic feel they were aiming for in the Nolan movies to some extent. No origin, the origin given in Begins is near perfect, and with Year One animated release and all those retelling of his origin the audience need to be spared of that
To some degree, not fully. It needs to give a good feel so people can be absorbed into it easier, not repelled by "Oh man, another reboot"No need in restricting themselves again. Defeats the purpose of a reboot if you're going to confine yourself to a road Nolan has paved.
That's a good cast Axelbratoski but I wouldn't cast Abby as Batman/woman. She's too pretty. I would have chosen Michelle Rodriguez because she has Batman's physique in female form and a badass voice.
Love your decision for Alfred.
I have to disagree. Her being "too pretty" shouldn't be an issue because Bruce Wayne portray as himself as a millionaire playboy/womanizer. He is basically like if JFK Jr. was actually a masked vigilante. He is rich and good looking, so he is always in the spotlight and his money and jet-setting ways justify him being "out of the country" all of the time when Batman is on the shelf with a broken back or something.