This movie is doomed.I'm getting ahead of myself here, but if there is a sequel, I'd want brainiac.
And I'd want Tilda Swinton to play brainiac.
This movie is doomed.I'm getting ahead of myself here, but if there is a sequel, I'd want brainiac.
And I'd want Tilda Swinton to play brainiac.
I saw that episode the other day. Gilbert Godfrey is absolutely hilarious as Mixy.So what, man? We're grasping at straws and yelling at clouds here.
![]()
Michael Ironside as Darkseid and Clancy Brown as Lex. Chef’s kiss……Andrea Romano had such a great instinct for finding the right actors to voice the roles
I'm not the biggest James Gunn fan, but I have to admit that I usually don't have a bad time watching his films (except for GOTG2...). Even if they don't "stick" with me for days afterward, I can't deny his craftmanship and impressive productivity.I liked the flash ok. I still say they should have taken the loss and recast Ezra. But that's neither here nor there.
The first venom was ok. I've yet to see 2 or 3.
The thing with Superman is, even tho I love Gunn's style, I really hope he hasn't made superman into a wisecracking super dude.
He needs to be taken seriously. Yes, Superman can, and needs, to have some humor about him, but I just hope it's not too extreme.
I expect that from a character like guy, not from Superman.
I mean, what this particular scene tells me is that, if anything, Superman is quite a serious character in a goofy world.So what, man? We're grasping at straws and yelling at clouds here.
![]()
We just make up crap now to justify arid arguments?James Gunn version would say something like " Wow!!! No bueno little Dude, hands off the cape, it's Gucci" Or some other Peter Quillish thing.
It's a movie. You either like it or don't like it (personally).
Anything else is just bandwagon jumping.
I like The Flash. It's got some severe fx problems, it's not "GREAT," but I like it.
I like (only) the first Venom* movie. It's a dumb movie, but I like it.
* I HATE HATE HATE the 2nd Venom movie. I didn't care much about the 3rd one, even though I gotta say I was somewhat (a little tiny little bit) moved by the finale.
Couldn't fare less about whether someone will agree with me on that.
Ah yes, making up false lines to justify your narrative. Classic approach.I mean, what this particular scene tells me is that, if anything, Superman is quite a serious character in a goofy world.
I feel like this is perfectly acceptable behaviour for the character as I know him.
James Gunn version would say something like " Wow!!! No bueno little Dude, hands off the cape, it's Gucci" Or some other Peter Quillish thing.
And for some reason most people will then swear up and down that that's classic Superman.
Maybe I don't know Superman.
It looks like The Daily Beast and Variety reviewers may be Snyder film fans...Its going to take forever to get to tuesday
Of course it's made up since I haven't seen the movie yet, and I doubt theres a scene of Mxzpytlk grabbing his cape in there.Ah yes, making up false lines to justify your narrative. Classic approach.
Of course it's made up since I haven't seen the movie yet, and I doubt theres a scene of Mxzpytlk grabbing his cape in there.
It's based off of some of the scenes that have been presented to us. A Superman who says things like "What the hay, dude" to his dog and call his droids Superman Robots.
This Superman sounds like Peter Quill and I don't know why people get so defensive about it. I'm just calling out the inconsistencies of people swearing up and down that that is just the way Superman has always talked while claiming to love how much he reminds them of Christopher Reeve's take.
Everyone loved how he code switched during that interview clip with Lois, the one where he goes all stoic and says "Ms. Lane"
I'm saying that these look to be two different characters.
Maybe in this movie there's Clark Kent, then there's the Superman he presents to the world and there's the Superman he is in the Fortress.
I think Batman has a similar thing.
No need to get defensive.
“Hey buddy, eyes up here” is 100% a Superman line. In comics or animation, that’s just pure Superman. “What the hey, dude” is more Clark Kent-coded which makes sense as David has spoken at length about how both Superman and Daily Planet Clark are performances put on by the 3rd character who is the real guy who can only be himself in private (ie, with Krypto at the Fortress) or with people who know the truth. Another example is him getting emotional during the interview scene, where David has explicitly said he was being that Third Real Guy character because he had his guard down with his girlfriend and let the Superman mask slip. These are deliberate choices that bring the character from the comics to life beautifully imo.
I’ll put this in Supes’ plus column so far (and without posting spoilers obviously):
Considering what people who have seen it have said, Gunn reined himself in and cut those scenes where his trademark isms and humor is just too much. Whether that was his move or mandated by someone above him, that's a good thing.
Gunn truly has a formidable cast, the question is (or to me at least) is if he can help himself with that damn script. But we'll see in a bit.
There is no one above Gunn. He is head of the DC Studio. It's a separate branch/entity of WBD. He is the final say for any film they put out. If any changes were made it's because Gunn decided so.