The Hunger Games - Part 2

It is something that I just don't understand at all. If you look at female athletes, they aren't skinny beanpoles. One would think that that would be the ideal since they are the ones in the best physical shape. It is certainly what I am most attracted to.
 
I think the lesson we can all learn from this........





Is that people are too stupid to live.
 
I went to see The Hunger Games and the movie was just about done when the power had gone out in the theater. What a burn out So one of the movie guys handed us 'raincheck' passes because we couldn't see the rest of The Hunger Games. So I wonder what happens to ahem and ahem near the end...I guess I'll have to find out on-line when I watch the rest of it. Mind you, the movie was getting good up until the power went out! Boooo! I say!!!!

So yeah...that was my experience so far. lmao.
 
Saw the movie yesterday and the only thing that really bothered me with the "kids killing kids" concept was the opening scene into the arena where most of them were running towards the weapons. Despite the quick cuts, seeing kids pretty much mercilessly killing each other, brutally with bladed weapons, was pretty damn disturbing. Seeing young girls being killed made it that much more disturbing too. I can't imagine that sort of thing not having an effect on teenagers who watched this movie (I'm 29 btw).

Really liked the movie though and I can't wait for the sequels. Haven't read the books so I did have a lot of questions (like the point of Liz Bank's character for example), but I plan to skip the books anyway (not really a fan of reading fiction). As a fan of sci-fi in general, I also liked the various sci-fi elements in the movie - the computer technology especially. Didn't really care about how the computer-generated animals came to life, I just thought it was cool.

Lawrence was pretty good in her role, though not really amazing, and it was nice to see her in something again after XFC. Definitely looking forward to seeing her in more movies as she gets older.

I watched Josh Hutcherson's Spider-Man audition tape on YouTube the other day before seeing this movie btw and couldn't get "Peeta Parka" out of my mind when watching him. :p The TAS trailer attached to the movie didn't help things either (awesome trailer btw, esp the clips with Spidey in costume).

I also want to add that Thor's brother was a *****e when he caused Katniss to miss the deer.
 
Finally saw this today. Didn't find it "amazing", but it was very enjoyable and I liked the social commentary. The concept is pretty disturbing, and even with the quick cuts to water the R down to PG-13, it's too violent IMO for some of the young kids in the theater.

Lawrence was solid. Tucci was hilarious, the highlight of the movie for me.

My favorite action sequence was with the dogs.

My full review:

http://www.jestersreviews.com/reviews/1317
 
6mzuB.gif
 
lmao the gifs are hilarious. lmao.

so I managed to watch the rest of it online and I gotta say, while the concept of kids killing kids is disturbing...unsettling I should say, the movie itself was great. I enjoyed it but the ending left to be desired and it makes me wonder what happens after...everything that has happened. Jennifer Lawrence was amazing in her role and I really bought her portrayal as Katiss or katnip whatever her name is lol. She's so damn good with a a bow and arrow, she should play Guinevere in the next adaptation of King Arthur. :)
 
LOL love those Jennifer Lawrence gifs. :funny:
 
The dogs weren't computer-generated.

You really have no evidence for that. It's too ambivalent in the movie. Otherwise it's all a big coincidence that 3-4 dog cages were right behind where they were running. Either way that was sloppy. You could see them bursting out of the ground behind Peeta and Katniss.
 
My favorite movie of the year so far. Loved every bit of it. My wife and I have seen it twice. I ordered the trilogy after opening day. Just finished the first book. There were some things I liked better in the film, and some things the book pulled off better. One thing I really wish the movie would have expanded on (book one spoilers)
is the slave lady that helped Katniss at the Penthouse. I also like the idea of how Katniss got the mockingjay pin in the book better. As someone else mentioned on another forum, if the pin was supose to bring you luck, it sure didn't help Prim! lol.
.

I look forward to starting Catching Fire this week. I am very happy with the casting choices in this movie series especially Jennifier and Donald Sutherland. I can't wait to see how Donald Sutherland handles the president role in the second film.
 
Last edited:
You really have no evidence for that. It's too ambivalent in the movie. Otherwise it's all a big coincidence that 3-4 dog cages were right behind where they were running. Either way that was sloppy. You could see them bursting out of the ground behind Peeta and Katniss.
Coincidence, or just another example of the gamemakers control of the arena?
 
it looked in the context of the movie like they generated the dogs .
 
:hehe:


Anyways, I think many of the changes made in the movie were actually better. I think the book is still better because we get to know what katniss is feeling and her emotions thus feeling a lot more emotionally connected. I especially thought adding [BLACKOUT]adding a rebellion from Rue's district was a pretty effective scene[/BLACKOUT] how ever as others mentioned leaving things out such as [BLACKOUT]the avox girl, and Katniss selling to the black market to keep her family alive was kind of lame[/BLACKOUT] but I don't see how they could've put in these aspects without it seeming out of place in the movie. Some things that work for a book wont for a movie. On a plus side I think the muttations were handled well (the idea sounded TERRIBLE in the book) and that the whole skin tight body armor was left out.

Overall though, it was a pretty good and fun film. Gary Ross did a great job and Im excited for Catching Fire.
 
Hunger Games Review
The Hunger Games is a teen action movie set in a dystopian future that acts as a commentary of today’s society, specifically the Occupy Wall Street movement with the poor (99%) against the rich (1%) alongside today’s pop culture sensation with reality television where people compete against others for fame & riches. The nation Panem has twelve districts, with the first two being the utter rich and the rest becoming more middle class to ultimately the very poor where people are forced to hunt squirrels and berries for mere survival. The Hunger Games itself is a gladiator survival match where two people (male & woman) are randomly picked from each district into the battle zone and only one may leave it alive.

Our protagonist Katniss Everdeen (Jennifer Lawrence) hails from the utter poor district 12 as the symbolic figure of the 99% alongside with Robin Hood symbolism her weapon of choice the bow & arrow. She is a survivor, beautiful, wise and utterly pure, nothing is wrong with her and the poor people as they are the heroes, they are the ones the audience has to root and cheer for, only the poor receive any positive light whatsoever in this film.

What about the rich then? The fashion for the rich is not any commentary on today’s fashion, but it seems to be very Lady Gaga inspired with people going over the top colors and crazy make up, it felt like the 1960s when color televisions became mainstreamed and people started wearing bright colors to show their clothing off instead of the bland grey and white. However the main point about the rich (or well, the evil 1% Wall Street people) is that they have no redeeming qualities. The rich are selfish, amoral, cruel and absolutely corrupt, some are even flat out insane, but the movie represents not a single good willed person, but simply that the rich are evil and the poor are good. Am I supposed to take this seriously? How one sighted and utterly pessimistic view is this?

As for the movie itself, it is two and half hour long and well for me, with all this positive reviews it has received alongside become a huge box office hit in the world, I really was expecting more and found myself very disappointed because of the latter half of the movie. The movie is very character driven and while the movie does not carry Katniss’ thoughts thru inner monologue, the fantastic performance of Lawrence shows great lengths of talent as her mere face tells us everything we need, with the orchestral soundtrack by the talented James Newton Howard, you have a great tools of displaying the emotional core of the money, but sadly it does become unintentionally laughable how blandly forced the “poor are noble, good and pure with rich being corrupt, evil and amoral”.

Now the actual Hunger Games doesn’t begin until the latter half and the director Gary Ross is clearly new to the action films genre and sadly does the worst possible decision with the movie, very closed up shaky camera scenes instead of clear wide and visually stunning action. It’s hard to be scared or cheer for the leading protagonist when it’s impossible to tell who actually is winning. I also found it incredibly bland how the game could be determined if you had “sponsors” or got killed by additional foes send by the game master, I mean image if Idol had elements like fan favorite singer getting special treatments or while during a song performance you also had to multi-task other elements? I just found that incredibly lame.

Overall, like I said I was disappointed. Its start off incredibly well with a very character driven emotional story that simply turns into a rich vs. poor commentary and to make it worse, there is no real big payoff to this movie, just a big hook for the sequel. You can’t end a movie with no real closure outside of hyping out the inevitable sequel. Also to explain a little, the reason these rich vs. poor commentaries are really stupid, is that they don’t offer any real alternate options outside of this very romanced ideal of a modern day Robin Hood. “In Time” movie had the very same problem with the protagonists just stealing from the rich to the poor in a very optimistic (and somehow successful light) and even Michael Moore’s “Capitalism: A Love Story” doesn’t offer any strong arguments how to fix today’s economic problems. You just get these “yeah a civil war against the rich and the poor, the poor will win and thus create utopia” is just so far reached.
 
I liked it quite a bit, especially the acting and the directing. Wasn't all that fond of the aesthetics. The film felt really small.

found the first half of the film far better then the Games bit. The "love" story just didn't work from any angle. This is one of those times were the rating hurt the film. It was so jarring that the film made such good use of the camera and editing until someone had to die. Then it became an incomprehensible mess. When you start playing with the film you draw attention to the fact that it is a film and it loses its impact.
 
It's a movie, they weren't going to hire a bunch of actors and extras and have them starve themselves. That is an incredibly unrealistic thing to expect.

Actually, this would be an incredibly real expectation considering the majority of actresses are actually of the thin variety.
 
yeah you all have to admit that it is funny that they hired a healthy chubby girl for a character that is very thin . in hollywood where they are all skinny.
 
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"