I wonder how they're going to maintain continuity with this radical of a makeup job assuming they don't revisit the character for a couple of years. I assume they keep prosthetic molds and wigs on file?
But that's no fun.Can we assume this scene is not canon? Because they could always decide to go with a slightly different look when he shows up again.

How is it not canon? Reeves officially posts about it.Can we assume this scene is not canon? Because they could always decide to go with a slightly different look when he shows up again.
Photos, digital models, etc. - it’s easy.I wonder how they're going to maintain continuity with this radical of a makeup job assuming they don't revisit the character for a couple of years. I assume they keep prosthetic molds and wigs on file?
Good, because I love this ****.Photos, digital models, etc. - it’s easy.
How is it not canon? Reeves officially posts about it.
They don't normally make a huge deal about releasing them. This is clearly meant to showcase their version of the character and hype him up for future appearances.Are deleted scenes typically considered canon? I mean what if this scene is never referenced on film again?
The way he looks at Batman is just perfect.
You sure about that? We don't know how much of this look is permanent. A lot of the injuries could be post-acid bath. (I know Reeves has said the grin is congenital, but some of the disfigurement looks like acid related injuries.) I'm pretty sure I saw fresh blisters and even some stitches. He could clean up quite a bit in a subsequent appearance. A grungy, punky sort of costume might be too reminiscent of Ledger (especially version 1 from the bank heist).But that's no fun.
I'll tell you what though. I have no idea how this Joker would dress. Definitely not a clean purple suit. Seriously blanking here.
Tbh that would add an interestingly off-putting sort of contrastBut that's no fun.
I'll tell you what though. I have no idea how this Joker would dress. Definitely not a clean purple suit. Seriously blanking here.
Johnnie Rotten was a huge influence on their designs for Ledger's Joker. It would be too repetitive to go there again.If the Joker does wear a suit, then I think Johnny Rotten/ Sex Pistols is the way they'll go.
![]()
![]()
Or, maybe Ian Dury?
![]()
Or go the opposite direction, and more glam
![]()
It reminded me of his razor-fingers bit from Azzarello/Bermejo’s Joker. But yeah, after that long in Arkham, your theory makes more sense.…at first I thought his hands looked like that from getting caught, but being 10ish months later that doesn’t make sense.
Its Reeves way of showing this Joker constantly is deteriorating his fingerprints, so he’ll never officially be ID’d.