The Official Choose A Director Thread

[Showtime]

I really like this move by him since I loved his XMen movies. Although now I feel like he's going to have immense pressure on him from fans and studio alike because of the crapfest that was X3 and Wolverine. If he makes anything less than amazing, the fans will probably *****.

I think he would have been better off going after a property such as Wolverine, if available, I don't believe there is a director on it quite yet. First Class is such a risky project at this point, and might not end up happening, although Singer does give it more cache.

 

[GreenKToo]

With the news that Spider Man 4 is on hold indefinitely from TMT's buddy Rob over at IESB, I would love somebody like Raimi to take over. IF that news is indeed true, the next Spider Man movie you see will not be the Spider Man 4 as you know it but something else all together. It was always odd that the studio had another writer working on 5 & 6 when there wasn't even a script for Spider Man 4 yet, especially since the writer was somebody Raimi didn't want involved.

Last I checked WB didn't want the type of director that Raimi is, too much control, so on and so forth. However, with all the time that is going to pass, I think they will change gears. Not to mention the changing of the guard over to Robinov, who sees things a lot different than Horn but has been playing the company line right now. If Robinov does indeed get the full reigns sooner rather than later, look for him to make a BIG splash of some sort with one of the properties, whether it be Superman or otherwise.

Raimi would be great..I hope it is sooner rather than later on the transition. Raimi would fit in with (IMO) the kind of directors that should direct superman. Ones like Bay, Jackson, or Abrams.

 

[Showtime]

Raimi would be great..I hope it is sooner rather than later on the transition. Raimi would fit in with (IMO) the kind of directors that should direct superman. Ones like Bay, Jackson, or Abrams.

Raimi loves the character. As evidenced by Spider Man and Spider Man 2, he can inject humor and still work with drama and action. I'm not saying this is going to happen, I'm just saying I like the move if ever there was a chance. Some might argue that he already made Superman 1 & 2 anyway.

 

[FilmNerdJamie]

First Class is such a risky project at this point, and might not end up happening, although Singer does give it more cache.

If you folks think there were high expectations for Singer taking over the Superman franchise, it would be reach "full ******" level if he in fact returns to X-Men. To this day, there are a lot of "If only Bryan had done X-Men 3..." remarks from fans. For all we know, his version might have disappointed fans too. Coming back to the series where its at a creative low and fan-interest near death will only make anticipation even higher.

"Oh well. Singer is coming back. Everything will be great again!" Not necessarily.

 

[Superark]

I think he would have been better off going after a property such as Wolverine, if available, I don't believe there is a director on it quite yet. First Class is such a risky project at this point, and might not end up happening, although Singer does give it more cache.

Raimi would be great..I hope it is sooner rather than later on the transition. Raimi would fit in with (IMO) the kind of directors that should direct superman. Ones like Bay, Jackson, or Abrams.

Yea but if he was every going to do a Wolverine movie, it should have been the original, not a sequel to it. I think he has a bit more creative freedom in First Class with the characters.

Raimi wouldn't be a bad fit for Superman, but then again we see the expectations that come with a successful director of another comic franchise. Plus considering Raimi's love for Donner's film, I can't imagine there wouldn't be any references or homages to that film.

Jackson would certainly be my dream choice if WB ever wanted another big-time director

 

[SuperDaniel]

Singer should`ve never left the X-men in the first place...

 

[Showtime]

Yea but if he was every going to do a Wolverine movie, it should have been the original, not a sequel to it. I think he has a bit more creative freedom in First Class with the characters.

The problem is, it might not be as marketable as say a Wolverine or Magneto, but you never know. Seems like an odd choice to be honest.

Raimi wouldn't be a bad fit for Superman, but then again we see the expectations that come with a successful director of another comic franchise. Plus considering Raimi's love for Donner's film, I can't imagine there wouldn't be any references or homages to that film.

There in lies the problem, Raimi is old school and if I remember, enjoyed Superman Returns. WB wants a fresh take.

 

[Superark]

The problem is, it might not be as marketable as say a Wolverine or Magneto, but you never know. Seems like an odd choice to be honest.

That's a valid point. Then again I'm of the belief the franchise has lost all interest of the GA and won't ever be a success commercially again. For me, Singer coming back means there may be a film I can personally enjoy. I don't expect it to be a hit.

There in lies the problem, Raimi is old school and if I remember, enjoyed Superman Returns. WB wants a fresh take.

Yea I read an interview with him somewhere where he loved SR. It makes sense considering SR was kept in the Donner Universe.

Heck I'm willing to bet had Raimi taken over the project instead of Singer, that you would have essentially seen the same thing. It would have been a big homage to Donner, except a bit more campier like the original and his Spider-Man films.

 

[GreenKToo]

It's possible that the next time we see Superman on film, it will be either in a world's finest film, or J.L.
I don't know if WB will risk another solo film on him. maybe, maybe not. It would sure be nice to have a hint at what their thoughts are.

 

[Lighthouse]

I'd much rather have Raimi leave the Spider-Man franchise and focus working on his original projects. I know Drag Me To Hell tanked, but he really excels when he's doing his own projects.

EDIT: And now SHH is saying the film is not in trouble. Guess it depends on if you believe the studio line or IESB.

 

[solidsnake86]

For some reason I see WB going with one of there harry potter directors because its similar in the sense that the directors have to adapt the material. They are different in the sense that there is more room to play with comic book films because there isnt one direct book to follow.

 

[Showtime]

I'd much rather have Raimi leave the Spider-Man franchise and focus working on his original projects. I know Drag Me To Hell tanked, but he really excels when he's doing his own projects.

In regards to box office and mass appeal, I think he succeeds more with product with a established fan base and source material. I guess it depends what you mean by excels.

And now SHH is saying the film is not in trouble. Guess it depends on if you believe the studio line or IESB.

If I was the studio, I would deny it as well. It's embarrassing if true.

 

[Lighthouse]

In regards to box office and mass appeal, I think he succeeds more with product with a established fan base and source material. I guess it depends what you mean by excels.

EDIT: And now SHH is saying the film is not in trouble. Guess it depends on if you believe the studio line or IESB.

If I was the studio, I would deny it as well. It's embarrassing if true.[/QUOTE]

I mean excels in terms of quality. I really liked Spider-Man 2, but I think Raimi is at his best when he's doing his own pet projects like Drag Me To Hell. That doesn't mean I think he should just do horror-comedies, but I tend to prefer films where he has smaller budgets and more creative control.

 

[Showtime]

I mean excels in terms of quality. I really liked Spider-Man 2, but I think Raimi is at his best when he's doing his own pet projects like Drag Me To Hell. That doesn't mean I think he should just do horror-comedies, but I tend to prefer films where he has smaller budgets and more creative control.

I didn't love Drag Me To Hell personally. I thought it was pretty fun, but I understand your point and you're not wrong.

 

[OptimusPrime114]

I don't know if anybody chose this guy, but I think James Cameron would make a great director for Superman.

He's done Terminator, Terminator 2, Aliens, True Lies, Titanic and Avatar!

Is that enough proof that he's a great director?

 

[Webhead2006]

I would hope sm4 isnt in any trouble. I do want to see what happens with the property. B

 

[GreenKToo]

It's got buzzard, I mean vulture in it.

 

[Showtime]

I don't know if anybody chose this guy, but I think James Cameron would make a great director for Superman.

He's done Terminator, Terminator 2, Aliens, True Lies, Titanic and Avatar!

Is that enough proof that he's a great director?

He is a solid director, but he just flat out said there are too many superhero flicks out there and basically ripped on them.

 

[bunk]

If you folks think there were high expectations for Singer taking over the Superman franchise, it would be reach "full ******" level if he in fact returns to X-Men. To this day, there are a lot of "If only Bryan had done X-Men 3..." remarks from fans. For all we know, his version might have disappointed fans too. Coming back to the series where its at a creative low and fan-interest near death will only make anticipation even higher.

"Oh well. Singer is coming back. Everything will be great again!" Not necessarily.

I don't even like the first X-Men. It could easily go either way imo.

 

[OptimusPrime114]

OK. If not Cameron, then J.J. Abrams.

If he can reboot Star Trek, he can do Superman.

 

[Webhead2006]

It would be interesting to see jj tackle superman now. But it sucks he will probably not ever have his hands on superman again.

 

[Lighthouse]

I've just come to feel that prequels are total dead zones for story telling. I quote Drew "Moriarty" McWeeny on the subject.

"Familiarity breeds contempt. And prequels are a narrative dead end. Period. Please. Please. Please. Stop giving geeks what they ask for.

"I want the Clone Wars!"

No. No, you don't. You think you do. But you don't.

"I want the Terminator Future War!"

Again... no. You really, really don't.

So while I'm kind of happy to see Singer back on X-Men, I'm pretty bummed that its a prequel.

 

[Webhead2006]

yea i rather go sequel so you can do what ever. Cause then with a prequel we know this this and this cant happen unless they want to rewrite xmen history and make it more of a reboot then prequel.

 

[Mr. Earle]

He is a solid director, but he just flat out said there are too many superhero flicks out there and basically ripped on them.

He's got a point. The market is getting oversaturated with superhero movies (i heard the were even planning a Hawkeye movie. I mean, come on, a Hawkeye movie? Lets wait for the A-listers like Cap to succeed first) and at some point it will blow up. The studios will get bolder and start making more and with less quality, people will get bored of superheroes and then we'll have another dark age for the superhero movies.

 

[GreenKToo]

The heck with it..I say go all out and do it with a bang.
Make either a Worlds Finest or a Kingdom Come type film. If they dont trust that another solo Superman film would be a smash, then pair him up with Batman or the Flash.
(IMO, Superman is not the problem, it's finding the right Director thats the problem, but whatever.)

I think a WF's with Batman would be the best bet tho. No need for an origin for either of the heroes. That would let them use Superman without having to go through the origin again and they could just jump right into the story.

They could have Lex and Joker as the main villains, with Metallo and Bane as secondary villains, the muscle if you will..
LEX and joker meet and decide to take care of each others little problem. Joker to Metropolis, Lex to gotham.

Heck, they could even use Routh and Bale as Supes and Bats. If not, then find other actors.
Director? Jackson or Wolfgang Petersen.
B.O. gold I say.