Smashlilman
Ouch!!!!
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2012
- Messages
- 3,133
- Reaction score
- 4
- Points
- 31
Which is why it's going to be tough to go back to the solo films without Whedon's imprint. It's both a blessing and a curse what was accomplished with this film with him at the helm.
I'm curious to know though, why Feige wouldn't allow Norton to use the emotionally compelling scene where he attempts to shoot himself in TIH ..... and yet he was cool with the reference in The Avengers when Ruffalo says he once tried to put a bullet in his mouth and the other guy spit it out.
I believe it can be done. I love what Whedon did but he's not the Golden child. I don't want Marvel fans to fall into Director worship like alot of DC fans have with Nolan.
As for the Solo movies, when I left the Avengers i realized i wanted to see more or each individual character. That can't be delivered in the Avengers. How many people left the theater saying wow i want to see more of Thor, Hulk, Iornman, or Cap. It actually makes the Solo movies more appealing. There are things that the Avengers can deliver that the Solo movies can't and There are things that the Solo movies can deliver that the Avengers can't deliver.
Solo movies
- Solid focused narrative
- Individual character development
- Increased focuses on a single characters action scenes
Avengers
- Delivers Character interacts between Iconic characters.
- Mash-up of different styles of action sequences.
- Extremely large and expansive battle sequences