The Official "I Loved Raimi's Spider-Man' Thread - Part 1 of 99 Luft - - Part 11

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm very much looking forward to MCU Spider-Man, but I doubt the magic from the first two Raimi films will be , in my opinion. Marvel Studios seems to be very aware that Spider-Man 1 & 2 are what they need to strive for, though.

Spider-Man 2 especially according to Fiege;

"I think Spider-Man 2 is one of the best superhero movies ever, so that’s a lot to live up to.”

http://www.superherohype.com/news/3...e-marvel-sony-spider-man-connectionreplicated

That's the standard they know they have to live up to.
 
I'm very much looking forward to MCU Spider-Man, but I doubt the magic from the first two Raimi films will be replicated, in my opinion. Marvel Studios seems to be very aware that Spider-Man 1 & 2 are what they need to strive for, though.

SM 1 & 2 have earned their right as CBM classics. I don't think they'll ever be replaced for what each one has done in terms of advancing the genre. Based on Feige's comments they appear to recognize those things I stated and are going to emulate what Raimi did as far as trying to make a solid movie. Story and character come first. One area I'd like to see an improvement though are the characterizations and nailing the duality of Peter and Spider-Man.


As for Spider-Man 3, I think it is obviously a flawed and disappointing movie, but I don't hate it. I don't think it was a movie that warranted Sony cutting ties with Raimi.

Wasn't that the other way around? Raimi was all set to make a SM4 and possibly 5 but because he couldn't regain the creative control he once had with SM 1 &2, and felt that he wasn't going to be able to make "the best Spider-Man movie ever," he walked away. Now, Sony should have done all they could to try and retain him and it's their fault for letting him walk away. Is that what you meant? Your comment about them cutting ties makes it sound like he was fired.
 
Wasn't that the other way around? Raimi was all set to make a SM4 and possibly 5 but because he couldn't regain the creative control he once had with SM 1 &2, and felt that he wasn't going to be able to make "the best Spider-Man movie ever," he walked away. Now, Sony should have done all they could to try and retain him and it's their fault for letting him walk away. Is that what you meant? Your comment about them cutting ties makes it sound like he was fired.

That's what I understood from that series of events, but it depends on who's giving the details. The special features from Amazing Spider-Man make it all seem amicable with a nice happy ending for all involved, and Raimi himself suggested going back to Peter's high school days. Others say Sony was actively working on the reboot while Raimi was struggling to getting the story just right for Spider-Man 4.

I remember there being a release date dispute, with Sam requesting another year to work on his movie; Sony saying no and starting from scratch, and having their new film come out the same year Raimi had asked for. That particular nugget of info is pretty telling.
 
That's what I understood from that series of events, but it depends on who's giving the details. The special features from Amazing Spider-Man make it all seem amicable with a nice happy ending for all involved, and Raimi himself suggested going back to Peter's high school days. Others say Sony was actively working on the reboot while Raimi was struggling to getting the story just right for Spider-Man 4.

I remember there being a release date dispute, with Sam requesting another year to work on his movie; Sony saying no and starting from scratch, and having their new film come out the same year Raimi had asked for. That particular nugget of info is pretty telling.

Raimi confirmed this himself.
 
That's what I understood from that series of events, but it depends on who's giving the details. The special features from Amazing Spider-Man make it all seem amicable with a nice happy ending for all involved, and Raimi himself suggested going back to Peter's high school days. Others say Sony was actively working on the reboot while Raimi was struggling to getting the story just right for Spider-Man 4.

I remember there being a release date dispute, with Sam requesting another year to work on his movie; Sony saying no and starting from scratch, and having their new film come out the same year Raimi had asked for. That particular nugget of info is pretty telling.

It certainly is pretty telling along with other 'nuggets' like Sam being told no he couldn't use the Lizard for SM4 and then who does Sony use as the villain for the reboot? Yeah, telling indeed.

I definitely think that Sony and Arad in particular were willing to place blame on Raimi for the wrong doings and were thinking they could do better without him. Especially Arad. That guy has an ego problem. But according to Sam, he was the one who walked away. He did so because he wouldn't have been able to make "the best Spider-Man movie ever"--that was his goal after the SM3 disaster. Not being able to regain his lost creative control, he realized going any further was moot.
 
Amplified by the fact that later on, VINO states that he has a symbiote replicated version of Spider-sense, yet he could somehow neither see or sense the big man with the hammer hand waiting for him in the alley. :lmao:
I don't remember him saying that.

God bless you! God bless everyone in your life!
 
It would just be like a silicone mask. They move with your face. Obviously once he puts it on, it cuts to the actor in makeup. Movie magic
They don't move like that really though.

God bless you! God bless everyone in your life!
 
tumblr_mpiqtmSX3x1r9rluwo1_250.gif
tumblr_mpiqtmSX3x1r9rluwo2_250.gif

tumblr_nqyw2ymoI71rob81ao6_r1_250.gif
tumblr_nqyw2ymoI71rob81ao2_250.gif

tumblr_mpiqtmSX3x1r9rluwo5_250.gif
tumblr_mpiqtmSX3x1r9rluwo8_r1_250.gif

tumblr_nqyw2ymoI71rob81ao4_r1_250.gif
tumblr_nqyw2ymoI71rob81ao7_r1_250.gif
 
^ Magnificent. The crown jewel of the Spidey movies.
 
Beautiful! Was the swinging scene there completely CGI? If it was then WOW
 
I don't remember him saying that.

God bless you! God bless everyone in your life!

When Spidey and VINO come face-to-face in the final SM3 battle, Eddie says something along the lines of "My Spider-sense is tingling...if you know what I'm talking about." Obviously, it was on the fritz when Eddie met Sandman.
 
When Spidey and VINO come face-to-face in the final SM3 battle, Eddie says something along the lines of "My Spider-sense is tingling...if you know what I'm talking about." Obviously, it was on the fritz when Eddie met Sandman.
That wasn't a reference to real spider-sense.

God bless you! God bless everyone in your life!
 
That wasn't a reference to real spider-sense.

God bless you! God bless everyone in your life!

I think it was, although with the vaguely-defined abilities of the symbiote in SM3, it's difficult to say with any certainty.

In addition to replicating the abilities of former hosts, a symbiote also banks and transmits memories, as is evidenced by Eddie's knowledge of Marko when they had just met in the alley. So if Venom knew Sandman, how did he not recognize him and have some wariness for Sandy's abilities?

Even worse, Sandy contradicted his earlier statement (IIRC) of, "I'm not a bad person...just had bad luck". That makes sense when he's validating his thefts to help his daughter. Forming a team with a monster he met in an alley so he can kidnap a woman and put her in harm's way doesn't jive with the repentant man we saw at the start and very end of the film.
 
I think it was, although with the vaguely-defined abilities of the symbiote in SM3, it's difficult to say with any certainty.

In addition to replicating the abilities of former hosts, a symbiote also banks and transmits memories, as is evidenced by Eddie's knowledge of Marko when they had just met in the alley. So if Venom knew Sandman, how did he not recognize him and have some wariness for Sandy's abilities?

Even worse, Sandy contradicted his earlier statement (IIRC) of, "I'm not a bad person...just had bad luck". That makes sense when he's validating his thefts to help his daughter. Forming a team with a monster he met in an alley so he can kidnap a woman and put her in harm's way doesn't jive with the repentant man we saw at the start and very end of the film.
spiderman trying to kill him probably left him with a desire to get him out of his way so he could save his daughter.

Why would Eddie be wary of Flint's abilities when his plan is to get him on his side, especially considering the movie doesn't give the impression that Eddie has spider-sense?

But the scene and the way Eddie says the line is presented more as him making a sexual innuendo.

God bless you! God bless everyone in your life!
 
It's pretty obvious Sandman wanted to kill Spider-Man because Spider-Man tried to kill him. It's one thing when Spidey's just trying to capture him, but trying to kill him means he can never help his daughter if he's dead. Spider-Man came real close to killing him, too. He's a desperate father, and if a father has to choose between his daughter and someone else, odds are any loving father will choose his daughter. Which is what Marko was doing. As far as he was concerned it was his daughter or Spidey.

Taking MJ hostage was just a means to lure Spider-Man there. I doubt Marko had any intention to harm her.
 
spiderman trying to kill him probably left him with a desire to get him out of his way so he could save his daughter.

Why would Eddie be wary of Flint's abilities when his plan is to get him on his side, especially considering the movie doesn't give the impression that Eddie has spider-sense?

But the scene and the way Eddie says the line is presented more as him making a sexual innuendo.

God bless you! God bless everyone in your life!

If the symbiote did have spider-sense (which I think was the case), then it was presented in haphazard way. If the symbiote didn't have replicated abilities from its former host, that's also wrong. Even setting that aspect aside, Venom swung directly into Sandman. SM3's version of the symbiote seemed to not only have a malfunctioning symbiote, but one that made its host blind. :loco:

Of course, it's obvious what really happened in this scene. It was a late addition to the original story that was forced on Raimi. He didn't want to do it this way, so he rushed through it without evaluating the continuity of the characters involved.
 
If the symbiote did have spider-sense (which I think was the case), then it was presented in haphazard way. If the symbiote didn't have replicated abilities from its former host, that's also wrong. Even setting that aspect aside, Venom swung directly into Sandman. SM3's version of the symbiote seemed to not only have a malfunctioning symbiote, but one that made its host blind. :loco:

Of course, it's obvious what really happened in this scene. It was a late addition to the original story that was forced on Raimi. He didn't want to do it this way, so he rushed through it without evaluating the continuity of the characters involved.
Does venom have spider sense? I've never seen that in use, but regardless, venom isn't shown to have that ability in the movie and when he says the line referencing it it's played as innuendo.

We don't see the scene, we see the shadow of it, but still I don't know what Eddie would have done. Attacked him? That would have been against the point of his reason for looking for him. I guess he could have dodged, but it's not needed for him because Flint's attack doesn't hurt him.

God bless you! God bless everyone in your life!
 
11 years later, Doc Ock is still one of the visually best CBM villains.
 
Not many villains are better than Molina's Doc Ock. Everything from SM2 holds up to this day.
 
Sandy contradicted his earlier statement (IIRC) of, "I'm not a bad person...just had bad luck". That makes sense when he's validating his thefts to help his daughter. Forming a team with a monster he met in an alley so he can kidnap a woman and put her in harm's way doesn't jive with the repentant man we saw at the start and very end of the film.

Another casualty of deleted scenes. Their team up was very different originally. Eddie approaches Marko after watching over his daughter in a park, and is more manipulative.

The "bad luck" line always bothered me. He made bad choices. He should have accepted this more strongly by the end.
 
It's a shame we didn't get to see the Lizard as rendered by Raimi. We have to settle for that piss poor excuse for the Lizard in ASM.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"