Galactus123
Sidekick
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2010
- Messages
- 2,882
- Reaction score
- 581
- Points
- 73
Those covers look really good. I wish they would make full comics like that.
If they make a new deal with Marvel it should include that they could make Spider-Man 4.She and Tobey have aged so well. I mean, if Sony decided to do a proper SM-4 with both them and Raimi returning after NWH -- they wouldn't have to do a massive time jump or whatever.
If they make a new deal with Marvel it should include that they could make Spider-Man 4.
I thought Sony couldn't make other live-action Spider-Man movies at the same time.I don't think Sony is obligated to make a Raimi SM-4 with Kevin Feige's full involvement. They could theoretically make it without Marvel Studios' involvement, but I think Raimi would probably want Feige involved to mitigate any studio interference.
The Spider-Man deal is just for Tom Holland's Spidey, but that extensive second window deal Sony inked with Disney says they're not splitting after NWH.
I thought Sony couldn't make other live-action Spider-Man movies at the same time.
Part 3
If there's a clause in that deal for that (and if Tobey's NWH return really excites moviegoers), Sony is going to do everything they can to get to a Raimi and Maguire SM-4. If they have to let Disney co-finance it, they'll do it.
Once again somebody doesn't know what they're talking about smh.A true Raimi cut of Spider-Man 3 would mean removing Venom/Symbiote completely. It's never happening. I truly hate what Zack Snyder/ZSJL has done to fandom.
Once again somebody doesn't know what they're talking about smh.
We've been asking for an Alternate/Extended Cut of Spider-Man 3 since the movie came out. Sony released an Editor's Cut back in 2017 on the 10 Year Anniversary of Spider-Man 3 (and Spider-Man 2.1) and leading up to Homecoming's release. It was a disappointment because it was barely any different from the Theatrical Cut (basically just an earlier version of it), it was shorter, it barely had any deleted scenes, and it was just thrown together at the last minute by the Editor. The Editor's Cut being disappointing, more people finding out about the deleted scenes, Tobey's return, Spider-Man 1 and 3 turning 20 and 15 Years Old is why more people have been asking for it as of late. Has nothing to do with Snyder besides the Hashtag.
Also Sony has been ****ing the fans over for YEARS regarding deleted scenes when it comes to the Spider-Man movies. TASM2 is another movie where fans want to see a longer cut and they were originally going to leave out the Deleted Scenes for No Way Home they were forced to include them due to the early pressings of Physical Copies leaking out on eBay.
Yet they still released an Editor's Cut which Raimi had nothing to do with. All we want is the original 3 Hour Cut of the movie that is more faithful to the novelization which btw IS the version of SM3 I want to see (and yes they filmed those scenes). It doesn't have to be a Director's Cut. 2.1 wasn’t a Director’s Cut. (call it Spider-Man 3.1 or something)Sam Raimi has no interest in releasing a Director's Cut. He doesn't even like Venom or the symbiote and never wanted to include them. His original treatment for Spider-Man 3 did not include Venom , Eddie Brock, Symbiote at all.
There isn't some magical extended or TRUE cut of Spider-Man 3 that will give you the perfect vision you want.
Yet they still released an Editor's Cut which Raimi had nothing to do with. All we want is the original 3 Hour Cut of the movie that is more faithful to the novelization which btw IS the version of SM3 I want to see (and yes they filmed those scenes). It doesn't have to be a Director's Cut.
After how much money No Way Home made and those anniversaries coming up, it's the perfect opportunity to milk more content regarding Tobey.