
Yes!Spider-Man 2 was more than that. It really boiled down to other things than Spider-Man swinging around the city, saving NYC from baddies, like the core of Peter/Spidey himself.
Spider-Man 2 essentially asks us, "Why would Peter continue to do this if all he is ever going to get is resentment and unhappiness?"
Once Peter realizes that not only is it his destiny, but also that he may not be the hero that NYC wants, but the one it needs (sorry for basically quoting TDK, but that's the best way to put it.) It's also an exceptionally personal and well-directed film.
For TASM, it's the 100% opposite. I used to like it, but the more I watched it, the more I disliked it lol. Couldn't care less about the sequel either.
Sony should have invested in Raimi for another trilogy in my opinion. They could have easily been approaching their own film-event with the obvious Sinister 6th movie, and it would have been garnering more hype without all the confusion surrounding the reboot.
Glad SM3 provided enough closure, but I think there was plenty of room for more development in the original series.
I never heard the reason why she committed suicide.Was it publicly revealed?In any event,it's very sad.![]()
Well TASM has grown on me a lot, didnt like it in the cinema, like it now due to re-watch's on BD. The sequel I HAD no interest in, but the trailer was pretty cool and my nephews love Spider-Man, so I will be going to see it I think.

Yes!
And to add to this, I personally feel like SM2 best captured the true essence of what made the Spider-Man as good as they were. A lot of people complain about Tobey not having enough wise-cracks, and how that made it seem more like the comics, but the truth is that Peter was more than just that. What makes Spidey stand out against heroes like Superman and Batman is that he has superhuman powers, but has to deal with so many basic human problems, and SM2 had the perfect mix of that.
We got some great Spidey action and fights, but what stands out the most in the film is that Peter, in his decision to do what is right, does not use his powers to his selfish advantage. He works two jobs and still tries to get an education, while also trying to provide for himself and his widowed aunt, and understands that the girl of his dreams deserves more than he can give, while his secret forces him to live with the guilt of playing a role in events that have hurt those who are closest to him. I believe Stan Lee said himself that the comics were like a soap opera where the star was not the hero, but the person, and Peter's story in SM2 was handled very well to the point where you cannot help but feel bad for him, which makes the ending so much better since he finally gets what he wants, even though it the last shot of MJ hints that even with this, Peter will never truly have a happily ever after ending, which I love.

I tried looking up a few stories and it was never really mentioned. She left 2 notes for her family,but I didn't see any mentions of why she did it. Either way,it was very sad. She seemed like a nice and beautiful young actress.

You seem pretty cool too![]()
"Pecker."
"Parker."
"Zat is wat I saeed, Pecker."![]()


I didn't get how Peter's nobility grew. He already learnt that in SM1.Spider-Man 2 was more than that. It really boiled down to other things than Spider-Man swinging around the city, saving NYC from baddies, like the core of Peter/Spidey himself.
Spider-Man 2 essentially asks us, "Why would Peter continue to do this if all he is ever going to get is resentment and unhappiness?"
Once Peter realizes that not only is it his destiny, but also that he may not be the hero that NYC wants, but the one it needs (sorry for basically quoting TDK, but that's the best way to put it.) It's also an exceptionally personal and well-directed film.
I wish that came in blu-ray.

I just feel like Raimi's Spider-Man captured the essence of who Spider-Man is and what the story was supposed to be about than TASM did. TASM has morphed the Spider-Man story into a legacy storyline between the son taking up the mantle his father left behind in order to combat his archenemy, and for me that isn't Spider-Man. Spider-Man isn't about watching Luthorco, er....Oscorp's freaks of the week taking on Spider-Man because his father was on to something. Spider-Man is an average and ordinary guy who has average and ordinary problems, which complicate his life and creates a burden that weighs on him. This why I just can't get into TASM series on a conceptual level. To me, it just isn't Spider-Man (ignoring some of TASM's more idiotic moments in the movie, of course). This is why I am not jazzed for TASM2, why I felt TASM was a mediocre effort at the character, and why when I want my Spider-Man fix, I still go to Dr. Raimi.
Once again, Spider-Fan is the man.I just feel like Raimi's Spider-Man captured the essence of who Spider-Man is and what the story was supposed to be about than TASM did. TASM has morphed the Spider-Man story into a legacy storyline between the son taking up the mantle his father left behind in order to combat his archenemy, and for me that isn't Spider-Man. Spider-Man isn't about watching Luthorco, er....Oscorp's freaks of the week taking on Spider-Man because his father was on to something. Spider-Man is an average and ordinary guy who has average and ordinary problems, which complicate his life and creates a burden that weighs on him. This why I just can't get into TASM series on a conceptual level. To me, it just isn't Spider-Man (ignoring some of TASM's more idiotic moments in the movie, of course). This is why I am not jazzed for TASM2, why I felt TASM was a mediocre effort at the character, and why when I want my Spider-Man fix, I still go to Dr. Raimi.

Once Peter realizes that not only is it his destiny, but also that he may not be the hero that NYC wants, but the one it needs (sorry for basically quoting TDK, but that's the best way to put it.) It's also an exceptionally personal and well-directed film.
I just feel like Raimi's Spider-Man captured the essence of who Spider-Man is and what the story was supposed to be about than TASM did. TASM has morphed the Spider-Man story into a legacy storyline between the son taking up the mantle his father left behind in order to combat his archenemy, and for me that isn't Spider-Man. Spider-Man isn't about watching Luthorco, er....Oscorp's freaks of the week taking on Spider-Man because his father was on to something. Spider-Man is an average and ordinary guy who has average and ordinary problems, which complicate his life and creates a burden that weighs on him. This why I just can't get into TASM series on a conceptual level. To me, it just isn't Spider-Man (ignoring some of TASM's more idiotic moments in the movie, of course). This is why I am not jazzed for TASM2, why I felt TASM was a mediocre effort at the character, and why when I want my Spider-Man fix, I still go to Dr. Raimi.

I just feel like Raimi's Spider-Man captured the essence of who Spider-Man is and what the story was supposed to be about than TASM did. TASM has morphed the Spider-Man story into a legacy storyline between the son taking up the mantle his father left behind in order to combat his archenemy, and for me that isn't Spider-Man. Spider-Man isn't about watching Luthorco, er....Oscorp's freaks of the week taking on Spider-Man because his father was on to something. Spider-Man is an average and ordinary guy who has average and ordinary problems, which complicate his life and creates a burden that weighs on him. This why I just can't get into TASM series on a conceptual level. To me, it just isn't Spider-Man (ignoring some of TASM's more idiotic moments in the movie, of course). This is why I am not jazzed for TASM2, why I felt TASM was a mediocre effort at the character, and why when I want my Spider-Man fix, I still go to Dr. Raimi.
Love the avvy. ^
t:.