piccolo
Doom is watching you
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2004
- Messages
- 1,574
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 56
The way I see it is that, in this movie Loki went from a brother and son who felt slighted, to someone who actually ascended to the throne and got a taste of what it feels like to wield tremendous powers. This is the beginning of Lok's journey to the darkness, and since he will be appearing in the Avengers, I think it is safe to speculate that Loki will eventually become the villain that he is in the comic universe.
Btw, I don't think sympathetic villains are bad; I think Doc Ock was more sympathetic when he was in the Spider-man comics, yet he was the best villain in the trilogy. It is when they have overdone it, like what Raimi did to Sandman in Spider-man 3, when it becomes a problem. I thought Branagh made Loki into a complex villain but in the end you want Thor to take him down for his actions. I think such complexity will only serve to create nuisances in this movie for us to appreciate.
A great villain is a great villain, whether he's sympathetic or not. I didn't say sympathetic villains were bad either, I said I thought Loki was too sympathetic.
You can have that quality in a villain, but at a certain point the villain is no longer a villain, and is more just a character. Which isn't necessarily bad, its just not what I preferred from Loki.
Loki was a great character. But a mild villain.
.