By this logic Nell, you wouldn't be getting anymore comic films ever. Think about it. Say the new Spider-Man film does terrible and any future films get put on hold for say, 8-10 years. The only choice they have after all those years is to get a new cast...which would technically make it a reboot(just because they don't redo the origin doesn't really mean it's not a reboot when you have an entirely new creative team/cast). From what it sounds like, if they can't keep getting the same cast over and over again to keep it from being a reboot, you won't give two ****s about that new redo, which means you'll technically be permanently done with comic films.
Correct me if I'm wrong of course.
I'm guessing Wednesday's numbers are around 1.2 mil.
I mean honestly... if the movies have already been done, why do they need to be done again?
Batman? Okay I can accept Batman, I feel it's the exception to the rule. Batman is a huge character in American pop culture, has always been done and re-done, and always will be. I don't think that any of the original 4 films - Burton or Schumacher - were any good. Nolan didn't hit Batman how I like either, but it was certainly a hundred times better.
But even in 20 years, do I really need another series of Spiderman movies, or X-Men movies, or Fantastic Four movies, that is essentially going to be telling the same story over again? Or would I prefer them make a new movie series about something that hasn't been done already? I'm going with the latter. Not the former.
I can accept that -some- things are going to be remade for infinity, but does EVERYTHING need to be remade until the end of time? No. We didn't need a new
Star Trek series. William Shatner is Kirk. Leonard Nimoy is Spock. I don't need to see new actors in these roles or see a new take. I really don't need to see a new X-Men series. I have my comics, my 90's cartoon, and now a 5 movie series that give me all the X-Men loving I would ever need.
And for the record, no, I don't collect comic book "reboots" either. I read
Uncanny X-Men, and
X-Men. Those titles tell the stories just fine. I don't care to see some "updated" take with
Ultimate X-Men, or
New X-Men, or whatever rebooted titles they put out there.
It's extreme and ridiculous to cry foul of Rebooting if you consider Batman Begins a good and necessary film (which it is).
Good? Eh. It's okay. Neither film was rather memorable to me outside of Ledger's performance as Joker. I let someone borrow my
Batman Begins DVD like 2 years ago and I never asked for it back. I didn't even remember that it was gone until I was going through my DVD's the other day. I think
Batman Begins was on TV, and that's the only reason why I even noticed it wasn't in my collection. My brother took me to see
The Dark Knight in theatres, and I've never watched it since.
Necessary? Well, Batman is on another level than other comic book characters, so Batman will probably be redone until infinity. The other movies sucked royally, so Batman needed something of quality in the film format. I'd have lived without them though, so I guess it wasn't all that necessary to me.
What's all this have to do with the box office?
The fact that I have 4 vouchers for passes to see
X-Men: First Class in theatres that I got when I bought my
X-Men blu rays, and I have nobody to go with.
So there is about $48 worth of
First Class vouchers out there that currently isn't contributing to the box office totals.