I'd love to read your review.
Haven't written a formal one yet, but here's what I've said so far about it on FB...
"I think Man of Steel is this year's Amazing Spider-Man for me:
A movie that's technically good, but missing some of the key elements of the character, that it ends up just making me nostalgic for the imperfect but somehow more enjoyable preceeding films."
"I... Didn't really like it. It felt strange. Like a disaster movie rather than anything hopeful or even character-driven. The entire cast seemed oddly wasted due to either lack of screen time or lack of quality characterization. The pacing and plot structure was pretty terrible, and the entire movie played like some stale form of recited past events than anything alive or immersive."
"Seriously though, I would say it wasn't well written for the following reasons...
1). The pacing was very poor. We just kept getting jerked in and out of flashbacks with no real flow or nuance between the transitions. Not to mention the numerous action scenes threw a lot of the movie off kilter. Making it seem like the last hour of the movie was just what should've been the ending battle done over and over again.
2). The dialogue for many of the characters was way too heavy handed. Pretty much every single thing Jonathan Kent said was purely to drive the film's big character arc for Superman. Jor-El also suffered heavily from that.
3). Lack of characterization. With so much of the dialogue going to purely advancing the plot and/or Supes' character arc, pretty much none of the supporting cast was given a chance to really breathe any life into their characters. For instance, Lawrence Fishburn just didn't FEEL like Perry White, he just felt like a cardboard cutout who's only purpose was story advancement.
4). All of those little moments that Becky and I have mentioned that would have built some emotional investment and excitement for the characters and movie were all missing as well, ultimately making the movie seem rather hollow and lifeless."