im not against it.. it can be done better than the above pic.Yeah, I've never been a fan of the cape/shield link.
im not against it.. it can be done better than the above pic.
![]()
im not against it.. it can be done better than the above pic.
![]()
all the armor crap that they put him in with the New 52 and injustice is just plain awful and completely out of character.
The armor gives him a military look which Superman has zero ties to
and why the hell does Superman need armor in the first place? We've seen in the New 52 that Kryptonite still affects him and it offers nothing against it so its completely pointless.
im not against it.. it can be done better than the above pic.
![]()
Armour is not a characteristic or an action.
It's not military wear. It's not actually even armour, although the early concepts did have it be armour. It's just Kryptonian dress. Just like Man of Steel (which actually did happen to be armour).
He doesn't need it other than it being as indestructible as he is. If Batman never got shot, he'd never need armour either.
Yeah, I've never been a fan of the cape/shield link.
Me neither. It never fails to look horrid.
I hate the Injustice costumes for Superman and Batman, and that includes their "Regime" attire. Just ****ing horrendous designs. I'm so glad they added in a good amount of alternatives for both of them.Something similar to this would be awesome to me. I really like how the cape connects to the symbol and I think the yellow belt is better than the red.
![]()
I dunno, The Eradicator rocked it.
^ He had no pockets that I saw. He must have just had it shoved down his onesie.![]()
actually it IS, they even state that it is in the comics itself that Supergirl wears ceremonial armor and Superman is wearing a military style one that he got from Brainiac.
In Man Of Steel Superman's suit was NOT armor nor was it suppose to be. It literally is underwear sort of as a joke to the fact that they got rid of the red trunks.