How can i pedal my ears faster?Chris wants the audience to catch up and participate rather than push everything at them. He doesnt dumb things down. Youve got to pedal faster to keep up.

How can i pedal my ears faster?Chris wants the audience to catch up and participate rather than push everything at them. He doesnt dumb things down. Youve got to pedal faster to keep up.

I wonder if they're launching the full site tonight, with some new still photos? I can dream, can't I?

I wonder if they're launching the full site tonight, with some new still photos? I can dream, can't I?
Practice.
![]()
But being hard to understand is half the joke in these parodies.A much appreciated and Billion$+ punchline, yes. And Batman may sound humorously gravely (of which I agree), but you can still understand what he's saying.
If TDK's prologue was any indication, this scene has already been worked on and is practically finished. I'm not sure if it was Wally who commented on it back in the day, but nonetheless I'm paraphrasing, "for all intents and purposes, what you saw in the prologue is the final cut for that scene". It shouldn't be a surprise, as Nolan would hardly be foolish enough for his first true preview of the film to be one that isn't highly indicative of what to expect during the theatrical run.And that's what people are worrying about with Bane...whether it's technically clear enough, not if he should be speaking in another fashion.
To put it simply, this issue with the sound is too plainly obvious and technical to be an oversight...especially for a filmmaker of his accomplishment. ADR and sound mix probably haven't even started, so much of this scrutiny is likely a bit premature.
The mask probably made it hard to both pick up and perform dialogue clearly because it was muffly and restrictive...so when the edit is done and locked, the ADR will aid in a lot of that. Until then...unless they do temp/scratch ADR's, they'll have to do as best htey can with on-set dialogue which they planned to replace for final anyway.
Such high concept humor they are, as well. Heaven forbid the next film provides any more fodder for parody...in any area.But being hard to understand is half the joke in these parodies.
When editing locks, that's when a lot of the rest of post, especially sound mix, starts. If editing is finished and picture locked, I'd agree. But it's still only a bit over a month removed from the end of principle...so until then, there's much that's left to do and up in the air. Yes, trailers and such that are handled separately from the main edit have their own mixes for release, but they are usually a much smaller and quicker affair than the real mccoy.If TDK's prologue was any indication, this scene has already been worked on and is practically finished.
Scenes are one thing...is the entire picture locked? Sound doesn't usually start their work a scene at a time like that. This isn't new. It may be indicative in terms of approach, but still rough in certain areas, which will happen with any film with material released so early. Sometimes it's early and less-polished effects, etc.I'm not sure if it was Wally who commented on it back in the day, but nonetheless I'm paraphrasing, "for all intents and purposes, what you saw in the prologue is the final cut for that scene". It shouldn't be a surprise, as Nolan would hardly be foolish enough for his first true preview of the film to be one that isn't highly indicative of what to expect during the theatrical run.
And considering it's all IMAX, we at least know ADR has already been done for the scene as it's a necessity for all footage filmed with the camera. It's a matter of little tweaks at this point.
Parodies are rarely high concept, it is what it is. While ridicule is practically inescapable with popular works, ideally one wouldn't want to paint such easy targets.Such high concept humor they are, as well. Heaven forbid the next film provides any more fodder for parody...in any area.
Of course I can't comment on the film, but the prologue itself is a different story. Again, [I think it was Wally] who confirmed TDKs prologue was 100% finished by the time it was out for public release. It was a special case of course, as it had to be if it was to be ready for mainstream viewing. At the very least it informs us what to expect this time around. If all aspects of post-production were handled for TDKs prologue, it would stand to reason they likely mirrored the same process for TDKR.When editing locks, that's when a lot of the rest of post, especially sound mix, starts. If editing is finished and picture locked, I'd agree. But it's still only a bit over a month removed from the end of principle...so until then, there's much that's left to do and up in the air. Yes, trailers and such that are handled separately from the main edit have their own mixes for release, but they are usually a much smaller and quicker affair than the real mccoy.
Scenes are one thing...is the entire picture locked? Sound doesn't usually start their work a scene at a time like that. This isn't new. It may be indicative in terms of approach, but still rough in certain areas, which will happen with any film with material released so early. Sometimes it's early and less-polished effects, etc.
Well certainly now more than ever it's going to be in consideration. By now it has reached Nolan and WB's ears that the issue deserves a second look. I'm just not convinced at the time they were shipping these reels out, they were cognizant of the fact that important technical details would be highly subject to alteration.Plus...be it a prologue or trailer, it's still, again, not the same sort of thing put into the sound as a final mix. Chances are, the indecipherable part will be well sorted out by opening....just like effects will be polished and color-timing will be finalized...even though some may feel some scenes need more color, etc. You might still prefer a different shot but you'll definitely see it.
His writing does seem like fan fic on paper at times. lol
I still don't buy it though.



Hasn't hurt things so far, has it?Parodies are rarely high concept, it is what it is. While ridicule is practically inescapable with popular works, ideally one wouldn't want to paint such easy targets.
And once again...the prologue can very well be finished as a scene, and signed off as 'that's how it will be'. But it doesn't mean it's gotten the full sound mix treatment. Heck, the current film I'm doing right now, some scenes were 'finished' early seven months ago, and sound mix is just working on the final version as a whole as we speak.Of course I can't comment on the film, but the prologue itself is a different story. Again, [I think it was Wally] who confirmed TDKs prologue was 100% finished by the time it was out for public release. It was a special case of course, as it had to be if it was to be ready for mainstream viewing. At the very least it informs us what to expect this time around. If all aspects of post-production were handled for TDKs prologue, it would stand to reason they likely mirrored the same process for TDKR.
Well certainly now more than ever it's going to be in consideration. By now it has reached Nolan and WB's ears that the issue deserves a second look. I'm just not convinced at the time they were shipping these reels out, they were cognizant of the fact that important technical details would be highly subject to alteration.
The property as a whole? No. But it could easily be argued that the performance and character itself is easily a point of contention amongst fans and moviegoers alike.Hasn't hurt things so far, has it?
I can only relay what Wally spoke on when asked about that specific scene. This far out in post-production, I'm sure every shot is always up in the air until the deadline. He seemed pretty firm that they left everything as is, so that's what I was going off on.And once again...the prologue can very well be finished as a scene, and signed off as 'that's how it will be'. But it doesn't mean it's gotten the full sound mix treatment. Heck, the current film I'm doing right now, some scenes were 'finished' early seven months ago, and sound mix is just working on the final version as a whole as we speak.
Yes, it's released for mainstream, but it can still get a rough treatment in some areas, as anything would this early on. I still don't see what there is to be concerned about aside from the mix...but for those who may not know as much about that I could possibly see them thinking 'it'll be hard to make out'. The answer is to look (hear) at it as an earlier effect...to be polished for final. It'll probably sound the same, but you'll be able to understand it better.
Ignoring the whole plane scenario for a moment, everything I've heard from Bane has been completely legible so I'm sure it's a non-issue in the end. If my experience at Heinz field was anything to go by, it will rest on Nolan's personal tampering. Hardy had little trouble getting his voice or dialog out, and there was no robotic post-processing helping to muddle his performance. To reference Batman in TDK once more, I'm not completely confident in Chris' judgment in that regard. But so much has been surrounding this issue, it would be hard for him to ignore.Again. with an actual mix coming up, I'm sure it's something they were going to pay attention to anyway. That plane scene is a hard thing to judge/worry about the whole thing by, anyway. Even listening to that, I'm sure with that approach to the voice (which I actually like quite a bit) will be made to cut through better. It's a big part of what he time and facilities are put into.
It's kinda' like a really distorted rock guitar line that's a bit fuzzy and indistinct at times in an early mix of the song, but for the final, it's the same effects/distortion, but it will cut through better, y'know?
And again...so?The property as a whole? No. But it could easily be argued that the performance and character itself is easily a point of contention amongst fans and moviegoers alike.

Again, the DP may not be the only person to get all the news from in this specific case. He could have seen the scene in and of itself, been told that it was signed off on, and that's the end of it. He probably wasn't there as they did a quick temp mix for release and so on. Saying that the scene is 'done' doesn't mean that there isn't more technical work to be done on it or any other scene for post and finishing, and he'll be there for the color-=correct, but probably not for the sound sessions. There's a lot left to do that will substantially affect the viewing/listening experience even outside of the edit and rough sound design. Pfister saying that scene is done doesn't really apply as much to this audio issue it may seem on the surface. The editor and director would be able to inform us better.I can only relay what Wally spoke on when asked about that specific scene. This far out in post-production, I'm sure every shot is always up in the air until the deadline. He seemed pretty firm that they left everything as is, so that's what I was going off on.

Ignoring the whole plane scenario for a moment, everything I've heard from Bane has been completely legible so I'm sure it's a non-issue in the end. If my experience at Heinz field was anything to go by, it will rest on Nolan's personal tampering. Hardy had little trouble getting his voice or dialog out, and there was no robotic post-processing helping to muddle his performance. To reference Batman in TDK once more, I'm not completely confident in Chris' judgment in that regard. But so much has been surrounding this issue, it would be hard for him to ignore.
I have a huge issue with this and my Inception Blu Ray. I don't think I've had this with TDK, though?Yeah, I have a really good 5.1 surround but I swear there were sound issues with TDK on dvd. Hopin to score the blu ray soon to compare. There was a lot of muffled dialogue, then the action was just supremely loud in comparison. So much so that I found myself turning my volume up at quieter dialogue heavy scenes and then down again for action pieces. Anyone else notice this issue? If so then it goes to show that there are some sound design issues in all of the Nolan Batman movies.

Yeah, I have a really good 5.1 surround but I swear there were sound issues with TDK on dvd. Hopin to score the blu ray soon to compare. There was a lot of muffled dialogue, then the action was just supremely loud in comparison. So much so that I found myself turning my volume up at quieter dialogue heavy scenes and then down again for action pieces. Anyone else notice this issue? If so then it goes to show that there are some sound design issues in all of the Nolan Batman movies.
I realize I may get jumped on here for this, but after watching the 2nd trailer, I was wondering if Bruce uses the cane as a decoy? To throw people off so no one thinks he's Batman? I do think Bane pummels him at one point, but when? Just throwing that out there. Talk amongst yourselves.![]()

Yeah, I have a really good 5.1 surround but I swear there were sound issues with TDK on dvd. Hopin to score the blu ray soon to compare. There was a lot of muffled dialogue, then the action was just supremely loud in comparison. So much so that I found myself turning my volume up at quieter dialogue heavy scenes and then down again for action pieces. Anyone else notice this issue? If so then it goes to show that there are some sound design issues in all of the Nolan Batman movies.