Excluding Batman's dialogue in the The Dark Knight, this outcry is nothing new, but latest complaint in a storm that started when dialogue from the Heinz Field shoot was released.
That was legendary artist Cameron Stewart, currently drawing Batman comics, not just some guy.
I thought it was worthy of mention.
I have a problem with citing him as evidence. He's a terrific artist, and has plenty of awards to reaffirm this. However, he is an artist, not a sound engineer, or involved in any credible capacity with recording and film production. His status as an award winning artist who is drawing the Bat-titles does not have the same credibility as say a person who's worked on several important (yes, I know it's a relative term,) films and has earned a reputation as an authority. If anything, the status as an illustrator great works against him, and erodes his credibility.
I also have a problem with the "anonymous sources close to the production" device. It connects with the issue of credibility above, but gives the writer free reign to use whatever he desires. For all we know, the source "close to the production" could be one of the janitors at the Burbank studio.While I like to believe it is a legitimate source, the whole "anonymous" source device is one that I refuse to use, and I write for a newspaper (not that I am trying to to rub it in anyone's face.)
One of the main issues with this "controversy" is that for the most part, it is not about the sound, but is an another argument in the endless battle between Nolan haters and lovers. Personally, I think the entire episode is overblown. When I saw the prologue I had some low-level difficulty with Bane's first line, but that was because he was talking through the mask, which was transmitting through a burlap sack. After watching it again, I caught the line perfectly.
Now, I might be in the minority in this matter, but want to play the devil's advocate. Let's say that it can be objectively proven that the mixing in the film is pure ****. Well, if that is the case, than it is the standard for all of Hollywood, because there have been numerous other blockbusters (a significant number of them superhero films,) that I had trouble understanding the dialogue. After tallying the number of said films, I could make the case that Hollywood is at fault for its crappy mixing, which renders dialogue impossible to hear during/after action sequences. And, this would connect with the ongoing problem in Bluray releases, which have drained the batteries of my remote in the constant requirement for extreme volume adjustments. So, Nolan is not the main villain, but the head of a hydra that enjoys administering headaches to the viewers.
But, I do not believe that. I believe there is more to the debate than the surface subject matter. And, I also believe that the claims of bad mixing are grossly exaggerated. As I mentioned, it's my opinion. Even if it was scientifically proven to be a terrible mix, I would respond: