Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]378909[/split]
Cynicism is a person's persective on life. It's a very grey subject, and you both have different opinions on what defines cynicism, so it's impossible to come to any conclusion on whether or not Batman's choice was cynical or not, lol.
I think so.I'm guessing part 45 is when we will get something.
Oh god, here we go again.バット人;22664365 said:I was reading the last version of this thread about Bruce Wayne giving up the cape and cowl. Batman is Byronic hero, "giving it up" ISN'T an option for the character as most people perceive him.
Christ, I can't even remember the specific 'parts' that had news.
バット人;22664365 said:I was reading the last version of this thread about Bruce Wayne giving up the cape and cowl. Batman is Byronic hero, "giving it up" ISN'T an option for the character as most people perceive him.
バット人;22664365 said:I was reading the last version of this thread about Bruce Wayne giving up the cape and cowl. Batman is Byronic hero, "giving it up" ISN'T an option for the character as most people perceive him.
Yup. It was basically this thread, but because of the title people were getting mad that discussions (and in some cases, spam/off-topic chatter) were getting in the way of any actual info to be found.I think it was back when we had the Info Hunters thread. Remember that thread? I do
I think it was back when we had the Info Hunters thread. Remember that thread? I do
Nolan hasn't browsed the internet in his life.Dear Mr. Nolan, I know you'll probably never see this but PLEASE give us something. Even if its just releasing the prologue officially, please give us something.
Respect,
SpideyFan866
Then it's time to change some perceptions.
Don't worry, there'll be something... soon.I really thought we're getting something this morning.
バット人;22664471 said:Sure. It's a different interpretation and at the end of the day, to get the established character we all know and love, you have to bend and tweak the character.
I just don't want to see people prancing around claiming that this is the superior interpretation if Nolan retires Batman, or kills Bruce. That cynical, self-destructive, Batman, the one that the majority of people seem to prefer (the cliched, "goddamn Batman") has yet to be richly and thoroughly explored on film. The Keaton/Burton Batman depicts this type but it isn't as, in-depth as say this current interpretation of the character, who is in some ways, a relatable, everyman who's emphasis is on the well-being of the city, not his own, personal traumas. For me, Batman's crusade against Gotham is the character's own outlet of his demons, not the cure or benefit for Gotham itself. He's a dark hero, while he shouldn't be completely selfish, I think it's rather silly to have him have this infatuation with the city and this grandeur view of legacies. He should be fighting for his parents first (a hurt that should never go away), and the well being of a city last. That's the nature of the character, unless you want to liberalize or cure him.
Sure "MY PARENTS ARE DEAD" can seem a bit simplified, but there's so much to it than that. He's always going to look for some wrong or something to fight.
A 2012 release schedule from a major UK High Street retailer obtained by MCV has mentioned two new titles for the first time.
Firstly, it suggests that Warner Bros upcoming summer movie hit The Dark Knight Rises will be accompanied by a video game tie-in.
Furthermore, owing to the nature of the in formation MCV obtained, it suggests a physical release rather than a smaller-scale digital title.