Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]379243[/split]
Let's put it this way... I know alot of people on here like to lick the ground Chris Nolan walks on (and believe me I love him too)... but there is still alot of room for improvement in the next version of this franchise.
ALOT.
Let's put it this way... I know alot of people on here like to lick the ground Chris Nolan walks on (and believe me I love him too)... but there is still alot of room for improvement in the next version of this franchise.
ALOT.
Reading the last view posts in the previous thread, all I can say is...
![]()
That's exactly what he did in TDK.
Having doubts is boring? When you've spent 40 minutes being shown what the Joker has done to f**k up the city and its people? What did you want him to do, ignore all that and say "No, I'm doing fine, I'm avenging my parents. GTFO, Alfred". Superhero does X thing, X thing has consequences. Superhero (who is not deranged) starts re-evaluating what he did. Story moves on. Batman is such a hero. Lobo or Deadpool are not, so I wouldn't expect such an element in movies about those particular characters. But Batman? He fights for the people. When his actions (directly or indirectly) hurt the people he fights for, he damn sure should doubt himself and do something.
Boring is when you quit to get better marks or to make it to a date. Quitting to try and find piece from a demon that's tormenting you since childhood is not boring, it's essential.
But see, that is entirely subjective. Personally, Nolan's vision is the closest to what I've always wanted. I'm not saying it's exact, and Catwoman's attire is a point where he's gone a direction I still don't quite understand, but regardless, I think it is wrong to act like one has to be a Nolan fan first to love his vision. That is just flat not true.
Not sure what Deadpool or Lobo have to do with anything.
As for TDK. Yes well, Joker was doing all sorts of crazy ****. Batman felt guilt, he felt responsible for it, he didn't want the blood on his hands. It is quite a moral dilemma. But still, the hero wanting to quit in the sequel movie is a cliche, no two ways about it. That's all i really had to say on the matter in response to someone saying Keaton/Burton Batman was cliche.
My ideal vision for Batman is a middle ground between Burton's fantasy and mythological approach, and Nolan's grounded, more practical approach.
Alfonso Cuaron to the rescue!![]()
It's not subjective. People who think his movies are flawless are flat out wrong.
Whether you like his particular vision for Batman is a different thing. That's entirely up to opinion.
My ideal vision for Batman is a middle ground between Burton's fantasy and mythological approach, and Nolan's grounded, more practical approach.
Alfonso Cuaron to the rescue!![]()
Well I'm a complete snob when it comes to Bioware's latest offerings, not to say I didn't at least mildly enjoy the third entry until that abysmal ending. I presume you liked it?
At any rate, I've been fine. Kind of just dawned on me that I haven't seen you for a while on the boards, probably because the last time I do remember seeing you was when the theatrical trailer debuted and we haven't gotten zilch since. Unless you count the toys and merchandise, of course. But enough of that, how's life been treating you since being away from the boards?
Just saying that these are 2 heroes I wouldn't expect to express doubt for their actions.
I know you're not talking about me, but I don't think Burton's films are cliche. That's the last negative thing I'd say about them. What I'm trying to say is that quitting may be cliche, but not all cliches are bad. If it's done well, I don't see the problem.
See, that won't necessarily be ideal, even to you. You're talking visuals here, right? Because you have no idea which way the story would go.
I think Cuaron potentially is the perfect man for that middle ground. And for me, that middle ground is my ideal vision of a live action Batman.
Because he purposely chose to show Batman as more of a mythic creature, a force of nature, than a man.
But you could also say him being willing to open up to Vicki was development for him.
Batman shouldn't. He isn't your average man. He should be steadfast in his mission. That's part of what makes him awesome.
Love's a funny thing, stranger stuff has happened in real life.
I think i've said this many times before but Batman can be interpreted in so many ways and can still be entertaining and faithful to the comics. It's why I love Adam West's version of Batman, Burton's Batman, Schumacher's Batman (Forever), and Nolan's Batman. They all have elements that you can look at in Batman's 73 years in the comics.
I think i've said this many times before but Batman can be interpreted in so many ways and can still be entertaining and faithful to the comics. It's why I love Adam West's version of Batman, Burton's Batman, Schumacher's Batman, and Nolan's Batman. They all have elements that you can look at in Batman's 73 years in the comics.
I think i've said this many times before but Batman can be interpreted in so many ways and can still be entertaining and faithful to the comics. It's why I love Adam West's version of Batman, Burton's Batman, Schumacher's Batman, and Nolan's Batman. They all have elements that you can look at in Batman's 73 years in the comics.