The Apocalypse
Superhero
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2005
- Messages
- 8,859
- Reaction score
- 5
- Points
- 58
I want to see the roast of John Cena.
				
			Al Snow
Gangrel
Val Venis
Jacqueline
Blue Meanie
What happened with the original Legends House?
Al Snow works for TNA.
X-Pac
Val Venis
Godfather
Rikishi
Gangrel
Ron Simmons
Hardcore Holly
D'Lo Brown
Plus Gangrel is directing adult films. I think it'll be:
X Pac
Ron Simmons
Godfather
Rikishi
There were 8 people last time though. What about Mike Tyson? He's in the HOF, is a celebrity who isn't doing anything, and was a big part of WrestleMania 14.
Drink it With Flair
A weekly 30 minute program featuring Ric Flair getting hammered on different alcoholic beverages across the world.
Remembering Chris Benoit
A weekly 30 minute program of static and dead air.
Drink it With Flair
A weekly 30 minute program featuring Ric Flair getting hammered on different alcoholic beverages across the world.
Gardening 101 with John Cena
A weekly 30 minute program with John Cena where he gives viewers tips on how to use shovels and effective ways of burying up and coming wrestl...i mean seeds
That's the problem with these "special attraction" guys. I've always liked Lesnar and I still do, but giving him such strong booking and having him only appear every so often is bad for the product as a whole. Ambrose has the World Title right now, but they couldn't even let him go over Lesnar at Mania.
Lesnar losing that match at Wrestlemania would've done absolutely zero harm to his credibility, and it would have boosted Ambrose's through the roof. Lesnar is always going to be popular, he's always going to be over, and he's always going to be credible.
As it is, though, Lesnar shows up every few months and slows down the momentum of someone much younger than he is, then leaves. So as it stands right now the WWE Champion is of lesser stature than Lesnar.
They wonder why the TV shows are hitting record lows every few weeks. It's because the guys they're relying on to carry the shows on a week to week basis don't get to have the big wins over guys like Cena, Undertaker, or Lesnar. If someone beats Cena he usually wins the next 2-3 in a row over them, cleanly and decisively.
Cena could lose 30 big matches in a row and it wouldn't do a lick of harm to him, but WWE still chooses to use guys that are over with the "smart" crowd to try to get them behind Cena, who's already more than popular enough. Owens should have gone over Cena, Styles should go over Cena in this current feud, Ambrose should have gone over Lesnar at Mania, Styles should have gone over Jericho at Mania.
I would suggest that the issues are related to overall booking and direction rather than wins/losses.
There's nothing wrong with losing if they're booked to look like they delivered a competitive, hard fought fight. See Angle vs Be**** at the 2003 Royal Rumble for an example.
Lack of long term planning, big fight competitiveness and the lack of "sports" from sports entertainment has diluted WWE.
I called it...(UFC)
Brock Lenar just beat Mark Hunt, I watched some of Hunt the other day and didn't see how the MMA snobs didn't think Brock had a chance, Hunt has one weapon and is slow and not all that mobile, as I figured Brock just took him down and pummeled him.
- Paul Lanzeby#WWE is either relieved that Brock's still strong going into Summerslam, or pissed that he now has more bargaining power than ever.
 
	 
	 
				