Mrs. Wayne
...
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2014
- Messages
- 12,977
- Reaction score
- 145
- Points
- 73
AW guys, apparently Zack called into a Detroit Radio show to defend Aquaman! 

it does sound a little like him but I'm calling BS just because how secretive he's been about the project.
When you say "contemporaries", who do you mean exactly?
I can't believe the dude stays quiet for so long and just decides to break his silence on a local radio show in detroitt:
The only thing for sure about Snyder is that nothing's for sure.
Thanks!
I find the Snyder haters often hate because he's cool to hate. It's because he's mainstream enough to bash, but not popular enough that he's got an army of people supporting him. Though that will change when the Justice League movie comes out (if it's good)
I think he's far more aware of the importance of images (and the intrinsic value of movie-making) than his contemporaries, though he is overly cautious in the writing department. What works on the comic page doesn't always work for film, but it's a far more noble effort than not trying at all. I'm hoping he has a nice balance with Terrio
![]()
![]()
![]()
Why Zack Snyder is the Hero of Superhuman Cinema
Throughout history and mythology, there are generally about only four heroic archetypes. The unlikely hero, the hero who falls,the sacrificial hero, and the villain who becomes a hero (redemption).
Most stories are a celebration of the first type of hero. Its the tortoise who beats the hare, the rabbit who outfoxes the fox, and the boy who slays the giant. Some are a blend of various archetypes. I would say that Shakespeares Romeo is an unlikely hero who loses his ideals for his vision of love, but ends up being a symbol of sacrifice for the redemption of both clans.
But that is quite the exception.
Heroism is most valued when heroes are absent. Ursula K LeGuin wrote a disturbing short story in the 1970s about a boy who has to be tortured and starved in order for a fictional city to thrive. The seeming moral quandary was whether or not to free the poor boy in Omelas. My question was whether to care at all about the fate of a city built on cruelty. It was one I wish I had asked in my philosophy class. But fear held me back from showing my true indignation.
It will not hold me back from writing this article.
Zack Snyder is the scapegoat of superhero cinema. Everything people hate about the comic book mythology on film tends to fall back on poor Snyder. But he is also a hero, because he dusts himself off, and tries again. His opponents raise the bar, not because they want the genre as a whole to succeed, but they want him to fail. The acting is average.
Well, are most movies in the superhero genre showcases for strong acting? If not, this is a highly selective criticism, and should be discarded immediately.
This is soulless.
Technology IS soulless. It cannot create life. This accusation has been leveled against complex CGI characters, stop motion puppets, and the medium of film itself.*
But technological progression is how movies connect with the younger generation. And they decide what becomes a classic, as they pass it down to their kids later in life.
Hes a hack. Anybody whos been behind the camera working long shoots for over twenty years deserves some level of success. Even Michael Bay.
Style over substance. This is the laziest misappropriation of an ancient logical fallacy (based on strong words conveying weak ideas) I have ever seen. Film IS style. All the major old films were technological achievements as well as masterpieces of storytelling. Orson Wells watched John Fords groundbreaking Western Stagecoach 40 times to make sure Citizen Kane was a powerful cinematic achievement at the time of creation.
A visual style is a directors fingerprints, while the substantial elements are in the script, and, at times, the images themselves. A director should not have tone himself down just to make sure the audience gets it.
Zack is damned if he does, damned if he doesnt. If he clings too faithfully, hes accused of lacking imagination. If he changes to supposed mythology, hes accused of alteration of the characters. He cant win, and he knows this.
But thats okay. Because he isnt fighting to win. Hes fighting for the progression of the genre on film.
In a world in which escapism within this genre is placed in a higher value than mythological storytelling, and fun is placed in a higher plane than heroism itself, this genre needs some films with demanding ideas. But (unlike some directors) he layers those ideas with action, drama, and character. And his visuals are unbeatable.
You can disagree. And thats just fine. Film is art, and art always impacts people differently.
But dont hate him for being an artist. If you must hate, hate on a case by case basis. But dont hate him for being average. Thats lunacy in a nutshell.
But keep in mind, hes now paired up with an Oscar winning screenwriter. Hell go farther than ever before. And you wont be able to stop him.
So, get ready for SnyderMan! He's DC's brightest hope.
![]()
Sources:
http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/89/Citizen-Kane/articles.html
http://kottke.org/08/06/early-movie-reviews
http://www.comicon.com/ubb/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=259494
http://media.gunaxin.com/stop-motion-animation-sucks/65361
Nobody hates Snyder. It's just his flaws are glaringly obvious to some.
It's because there's divide between those who appreciate his reverence to source material and those who want the best possible film.
Nobody hates Snyder. It's just his flaws are glaringly obvious to some.
A lot of people loathe Snyder, he's one of the most reviled creatives in geekdom along with Michael Bay, Roberto Orci, and Brett Ratner, and it's causing some other people to end up being defensive about him.
It's because there's divide between those who appreciate his reverence to source material and those who want the best possible film.
And some think these supposed "flaws" are a huge exaggeration.