In fact it is makes a lot more of sense than Lincoln or bigfoot.
Elvis has been said to be alive somewhere. For someone who is trying to name any absurd theory about Batman, that one could make it and still have some remote relation with the main subject. Lincoln on the other hand...
But you need a certain basic amount of cellbrains to get the obvious connection.
Yet you are the one who believes that Elvis is alive somewhere and attributes that as a reason for his picture on the list of Batman suspects, when (like RachelDawes said) it was meant to be nothing more than a quick throwaway gag. So much for all your talk about brains.
Yeah. No one can deny that was bigfoot, because we all know that was the very real one. 
Nice way of dodging the question. But in this part of my post I never said anything about them being "real" but rather instantly recognizable by anyone. That's the kind of dumb mistakes you make when you try to act smarter than you really are.
Anyways, they could have used some sketches made out of some witness' description if pics from movies are not allowed. To which I can't find a reason why they couldn't be.
Why would they when the very intention of the scene was to show that they just didn't care to investigate who was Batman in the first place?
You fail to grasp metaphors at all. Or comedy with some effort behind it.
Oh, you were trying to be funny? I guess your jokes are as dumb as your wits then.
The kind that has a brain that works. The other kind is the one that keeps being envious at those people's intelectual abilities by starting personal attacks.
Delusions of grandeur from someone who can't even spell their "intelectual" abilities properly, let alone claim to have any.
That the fact that any of those characters are fictional or not is irrelevant. Opposite to what you implied with "Both Nosferatu and Dracula are fictional characters..." (as if bigfoot was too real).
Bigfoot may not be real, but it is a real-life urban legend. There have been studies, investigations and research on it. Compared to Dracula and Nosferatu who have absolutely no basis in real life.
So I take that that thematic relationship means a lot of effort for you.
Not for me, but the cops who are supposed to be investigating the true identity of Batman.
I don't remember saying it was a very good and believable theory.
But it's good enough for you to think that the writer would factor it as a reason for including Elvis as a possible Batman suspect. Oy.
And about dealing with dumb people, I just have to fight them once in a while on internet.
Yeah, we know.
the first one was very acceptable so I gave the second one a chance. It was my brain who told me it was a pile of crap.
But you have to admit most audiences were numb-brained enough to find it funny, the kind of people who enjoys pointless random jokes.
Yeah, the same "numb-brained people" who went to see the first one were stupid enough to see the second in theaters.
That's the classic mediocrity's maxim: why should I bother with this if it's not what people will notice the most.
No, it's the classic insignificant maxim: why should anyone bother with this if it is so petty and trivial. Because I'd love to hear your explain as to why a harmless throwaway gag is so important to you as to warrant such a thorough and substantial examination.
By the way, I find it hilarious that you with your 'SUPERIOR INTELLECT', turned your brains off for two hours to deem the first Transformers (or mindless Michael Bay film with big explosions and robots beating the crap out of each other) as 'acceptable' but not for a two second casual joke from TDK. Ah, the burden of genius.
t: 
