TMOS Review & Speculation Thread (Spoilers) - Part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
The police taking her to the house isn't an issue. For all copper knew Supes was checking on a civilian. It's when Lois gets out of the cop car and screams "Clark!"

That was kind of like... ummmmmm hello? There's a cop RIGHT THERE.

lol

- Jow


I think this is what erked me the most about the movie. They were trying to make it realistic, but then had so many obvious scenes such as the one you mention that just took alot of the realism out of the movie for me. I wanted to walk away feeling as if this could have really happened on Earth, instead I walked away feeling like I just watch your every day Hollywood movie that had little humor and some scenes were not done right. I absolutely loved the flashbacks, pa Kent was amazing, Jor-El was very good aswell and Snyders vision for Krypton was just awesome!

All in all I probably walked away a bit disappointed because I wanted it to be a 10, there were just to many scenes that could have done in a more realistic manner. And how in the world did Lois just pop up after Sups snapped Zods neck??? I mean Sups and Zod were flying around the city smashing up buildings, 1 min after they smash into the building where Sups snapped Zods neck, Amy pops up? Scenes like this kept happening and ticking me off! Hollywood at its best!
 
Last edited:
I think this is what erked me the most about the movie. They were trying to make it realistic, but then had so many obvious scenes such as the one you mention that just took alot of the realism out of the movie for me. I wanted to walk away feeling as if this could have really happened on Earth, instead I walked away feeling like I just watch your every day Hollywood movie that had little humor and some scenes were not done right. I absolutely loved the flashbacks, pa Kent was amazing, Jor-El was very good aswell and Snyders vision for Krypton was just awesome!

All in all I probably walked away a bit disappointed because I wanted it to be a 10, there were just to many scenes that could have done in a more realistic manner. And how in the world did Lois just pop up after Sups snapped Zods neck??? I mean Sups and Zod were flying around the city smashing up buildings, 1 min after they smash into the building where Sups snapped Zods neck, Amy pops up? Scenes like this kept happening and ticking me off! Hollywood at its best!
:up: u have a very analytical mind. haha
 
Good movie overall, but the love story didn't really work
 
:up: u have a very analytical mind. haha


Lol, hey, don't get me wrong, I really liked the movie, I just like to complain :D Im going again on Sunday with 8 more people that I bought tickets for, and honestly I can't wait to see it again! But your right, I guess I do :D
 
Last edited:
a few tidbits from my experience:

- I think our preconceived notions of "our" Clark Kent/Superman played an effect in some of the so so critic reviews. I actually have such an investment in Smallville's Clark that the first hour of Man of Steel I couldn't help but catch myself thinking of Henry as an imposter. It took Welling ten years to earn the uniform and Cavill gets it tossed to him after 30-40 minutes.
- It seemed like Jor-El predestined him to be Earth's role model. I would have rather had 15 minutes of fewer action scenes to show the formation of Clark's moral compass.
- I would have liked a little more restraint to the destruction in the action sequences. I just kept imagining all of the collateral damage that was occurring during the city scenes. I would have preferred Clark to bring the fight to a more deserted locale.
- The known identity of Superman by Lois is an interesting gamechanger as it occurs at a slower tempo in every other iteration.
- The fighting scenes were unreal as they were so brutal and lightning fast. faora almost seemed to warp around when taking down the army soldiers.
- The ending was a welcome conclusion as it brought us back to more familiar ground to which a sequel can build on.
- Overall I was pleasantly surprised after a half week of negativity from critics as forum posters. Add more character, warmth, and positivity to the sequel and we will be in prime territory.
 
Just watched it, and was NOT disappointed!

Keep in mind, my hopes for this movie were through the roof!

Can't wait to watch it again!
 
It was great to see a subtle connection growing since he knew he could trust Lois. One great kiss kind of summed up their trust and early relationship. Then they followed it with a couple of humorous lines to not make it overly sappy. :up: Nicely done.
 
Honestly Cavill nailed the Smallville/Pre Superman scenes. The fact that his voice is perfect for Superman completely mops the floor with Welling.
 
Superman Homepage reviews

Scotty V

Worry not about the critics who currently can't wrap their heads around the new Superman. Man of Steel is, no holds barred, the best comic book film I have ever seen. When the film ended, I sat silently for several minutes, before announcing that it may be the best film I have ever seen. Granted, this is from a standpoint of being the huge Superman fan that I am and my having waited my whole life to see a Superman film where the character, and the world around him is taken completely seriously. While there are humorous moments... moments of comedic relief, Man of Steel is a complete tour de force of super-powered action that hasn't been seen on film for any character, Superman or otherwise. The jaw-dropping action scenes are nothing short of awe-inspiring at every turn. The character depth in even characters with the shortest arcs keeps the viewer feeling interested in every scene from start to finish. I was on the edge of my seat, feeling intense emotion from the moment the opening began. Man of Steel grabs you from it's first fade-in and doesn't let go until the credits roll.
On Monday, June tenth, I had the absolute joy of my life in being invited to the World Premiere of Man of Steel in New York City. Due to my involvement with the Superman Homepage, the greatest and most comprehensive Superman site on the web, and the only one Henry Cavill himself says he frequents, and my affiliation with people like Steve Younis and Jeffrey Taylor, I was able to take part in this incredible event. Now, the current crop of band-wagon, sheep-lemmings out there who don't seem able to form their own opinion, but would rather go with the flow, would have you believe that Man of Steel simply doesn't measure up, that this film doesn't do Superman justice. I'm here to tell you they are wrong.

In 1978, I, like many of those judging Man of Steel, saw Christopher Reeve in Superman the Movie, and my four year old self was absolutely riveted. I credit the classic film with helping to foster in me a lifelong love of the character which has developed into a desire to see him represented in a completely straightforward and serious way for almost thirty-five years. In the late 70's, before there were any feature length superhero films, Superman The Movie was a benchmark. It was the first time anyone had seen any superhero on the big screen presented in a somewhat realistic way and taken somewhat seriously, at times. For decades, fans and critics alike praised the film, and still do, for what it was able to accomplish and for how it presented the subject matter. It is so beloved, in fact, that in 2006 Warner Brothers even released a pseudo-sequel to the four film franchise, directed by Bryan Singer, and called it Superman Returns. Returns wasn't well received and has since fallen by the wayside, the On Her Majesty's Secret Service of the Superman films, if you will.

Seven years later, it seems to me that Warner Brothers and DC have learned from their previous decisions and have really gone about doing things right. While Superman Returns was much heavier than the more lighthearted Christopher Reeve films, it still didn't register well enough with fans or critics. Man of Steel is a completely different animal all together. While there are homages to many different incarnations of the character, things we've all come to know and expect, it is in no way connected to the "Woah Jim, that's a bad outfit" pimp on the street telephone booth changing 70's. To some, this is a change difficult to embrace and others have placed an embargo on even going to the theater to see Man of Steel. Others though, viewers like myself, see this is a welcome and much needed breath of fresh air that has been long overdue. While I enjoyed Superman Returns and the Christopher Reeve films have a special place in the nostalgia of my heart, Man of Steel is the Superman film I've always wanted to see.

From the opening montage of Zack Snyder's film, the viewer is entranced and involved with the characters. Characters whom, in the past, were given cursory introductions and developed briefly for the sake of plot are here given full bore and have a depth and completeness never before seen. Questions sometimes arise as to the hows and whys, but then the action and adventure overtakes you and you're back in the moment. While Man of Steel is an origin story, as the story progresses, you begin to realize you're being shown parts of the Superman story you've never seen before. There are some subtle changes to some of the things most viewers know and there are some major mythology differences that may have the most staunch fans wishing they hadn't been altered. Some of those alterations are vaguely familiar to viewers of other Superman iterations while others are completely fresh for this take.

Krypton, for instance, is a fully realized, completely living planet, complete with wildlife, technology, architecture and people that feels more urgently in need of enlightenment but is at the same time more advanced than anything we've seen. Russel Crowe's Jor-El is more a complete character in his first moments on screen than he has been in 35 years of Superman on film. We know Jor-El as the genius scientist who sends his infant son away in a rocket in order to save him from eminent destruction. In Man of Steel, he is presented as a concerned husband and father, but also a pro-active citizen and is pretty capable of self-defense too. While it is unfair to compare two completely different portrayals, I feel confident in saying this is the best on-screen Jor-El I have ever witnessed. Crowe is perfect in the role and embodies the father of Kal-El with a regal aura and a gravitas that is befitting a character of Jor-El's massive importance to the mythology. Ayelet Zurer presents us with a Lara that is at once like a queen ready to send people to their duty but also a desperate, heart-broken mother who knows what must be done.

On Earth, there is so much emotion and depth of character that the viewer never needs to hope one scene rushes in order to get to another part of the story. Every scene and every character is present for a reason and moves the story along in an interesting way. Diane Lane is very down to Earth and wise as Martha Kent. She is clearly filled with love for her son and has taught him so much throughout his life. The toughness and understanding Lane brings to the role are a perfect match for the adoptive mother of Superman. If there is any type of acting nod or nomination given to this film, the person I'd likely predict would be Kevin Costner as Jonathan Kent. Embodying Kent with a simple, yet emotional core and causing the viewer to realize almost from the beginning why Clark has grown into the man he is, Costner's performance is sublime. Every scene Jonathan Kent appears in crackles with electricity and oozes realism. When Costner was announced as being cast I was certain he would be the perfect Pa Kent and the highly experienced actor has proven me right.

There are some interesting secondary characters in the film that serve to bridge the gap between ordinary every day people and non-powered heroes who do everything they can to save the day. For instance, Michael Kelly plays a character never embodied on screen before, but one that will be nice for fans to see. Rebecca Buller, who many fans feared was to be Jimmy Olsen in female form, plays the character Jenny as an eager, yet frightened young intern and Richard Schiff fits perfectly as another well-known to fans Superman character, while Harry Lennix embodies a military leader with the protection of his country at all costs his clear motivation. One thing all these characters have in common is that they feel real. By that I mean they feel authentic. These characters seem to have desires and duties and emotions and they seem to matter. Kelly's newsroom character still feels like a type of person someone could really work with, while Jenny is any number of young girls we could all know.

Christopher Meloni is one of the most interesting characters to watch and his Colonel Nathan Hardy has a complete story arc. Meloni plays a man of duty who knows he must protect his country with urgency and in his portrayal we truly believe he will do what needs to be done. What I love about the military in this film, as opposed to other action films they've been used in is that these soldiers and leaders seem logical, realistic and are not played for laughs or as baffoons. Lawrence Fishburne is Perry White. There was some concern over his casting as being against type and I can tell you that all of that concern is completely unwarranted. Fishburne's White is the embodiement of an experienced newsman who runs his establishment with dignity and honesty. Though I myself was concerned, after seeing a picture of Perry with an earring in still shots from the film, Fishburne's portrayal is spot on and I truly can't wait to see it again to watch him in action.

Many people were dubious when it was announced that Michael Shannon would be playing General Zod in the film. Fans complained that with Superman Returns we were served a retelling of Superman the Movie, and that now we'd be getting Superman II. I said, at the time, that there was no reason we couldn't see a new version of Zod, a more menacing version of Zod, a version of Zod that wasn't just evil for evil's sake, but a fully fleshed out character whose motives might even be understandable even if his methods were extreme. With Shannon's Zod, that's exactly what we get. Screenwriter David Goyer has done a splendid job with making Zod somebody we both fear and also understand and Michael Shannon's portrayal of Krypton's military leader is frightening, intimidating and extremely entertaining to watch. Antje Traue as Commander Faora, Zod's second in command, is incredible and a joy to watch as a soldier loyal to her General and more than ready to kill when necessary.

There was quite an uproar when Amy Adams was cast as Lois Lane. People were confused because it was thought that Lois should have dark hair. Well I'm here to say that in this film Lois has red hair and that it's just fine. Amy Adams is an Academy Award nominated actress who has played so many varied roles over the course of her career that I was certain she'd be perfect for the role, and she is. Adams' hair color is of no consequence as she plays Lois with a feisty, stong-willed determination to get her story and to uncover any secret. Adams also brings a strongly emotional and understanding protective side to Lois and her perky, energetic demeanor made me smile many times while watching her performance.

Many of the early, pre-release reviews are complaining of too much action and not enough character or saying that while the film is action packed it lacks any emotion. To this I can only say that I didn't feel that way at all. There is certainly a lot of action, and the handheld camera Snyder settled on using to shoot the entire film makes you feel part of that action from beginning to end. The effects in this film are among the best I've ever seen and I'm somewhat an aficionado when it comes to superhero cinema. Clearly we all know there are a great many times we're witnessing a CGI effect when Superman flies or is battling Zod and yet, there was no point where I was ever taken out of the film by a noticeable effect. Even one still shot I'd previously made a joke about where Jor-El is looking out over a war-ravaged Krypton looked breathtaking in action. There has never been another superhero film where the powers, battles and action looked so good.

While Hans Zimmer's overall score hasn't so far been memorable to me, I will say that the main three note theme with the rousing drums has been soaring through my head for months. Most will compare to John Williams' legendary Superman score, and it's certainly no where near as memorable, but it suits the movie rather well. The gathering of some of the most prolific drummers in the world was a rather genius idea, and for some of the flight and action scenes it is the perfect companion. The score actually sits rather well as an accompaniment to most of the scenes. It's often hardly noticeable as being there, but then it surges at appropriate moments and helps bring out the emotion of the story. I was lucky enough to arrive at the World Premiere After Party just as Zimmer and a group of young, talented musicians began to play the main theme. I can't tell you what it's actually called yet, as I don't yet have my soundtrack, but it was very stirring to hear it live at the party.

Finally, Henry Cavill, Superman himself is the heart of this film. Henry Cavill is perfectly cast as the hidden hero trying to do the right thing. When we meet him he's a bit of a loner by necessity, but throughout the film we experience with him as he learns who he is and what he needs to do. When he soars for the first time we soar with him and we feel the same sense of exhileration that Clark must be feeling bolting through the clouds. Cavill has somewhat limited dialogue, a complaint about the aforementioned "Superman Returns" and Brandon Routh, but he delivers his lines with such passion and feeling that we never doubt his intent for a second. His sense of determination as both a son and a hero are palpable, and when he suffers set backs or a has a harrowing experience, Henry Cavill makes us worry and care and often hold our breath. Those who weren't sure what to expect from this film may ask "where's the hope?" I tell you the hope is embodied by Cavill's Clark, by Superman's drive to always do the right thing, to lift up and rescue humanity when humanity needs it most. While Crowe's Jor-El informs us and is integral to the Kal-El backstory, and Jonathan Kent always instills values and life lessons in our hero, Superman is the guy we came to see and Cavill does him truth and justice.

Shawn Morrissey

Shawn Morrissey has finished his spoiler-free review of "Man of Steel." Here it is:
Finally, after years of waiting for word on a new movie, and then months of waiting for that movie's release, I got the awesome luck to be in a country that got Man of Steel earlier than most. That was this morning, June 13th, and as promised, here are my initial thoughts:

For the most part, I loved it. It's fast, action-packed, and driven by an interesting plot and intriguing MacGuffin. The plot effectively drives the entire movie, right down to the action. It creates an urgency for all the characters. From the House of El to the Kryptonian Council to Zod, the Kents, Lois - everyone, the story is driving this bus.

What I loved most is that it's a science fiction film. Top to bottom, this is a sci-fi Superman epic, something for which I've been longing. The sci-fi elements of the mythos are among my favourite bits, especially when they center around Superman's origin.

The cast fits like Lego into the respective roles. Cavill's Kal El/Clark Kent/Superman is still growing, and the way he's handled is spot on with that considered. Adams is a redhead - and it still doesn't matter. She's excellent as Lois Lane. Shannon is a bubbling volcano, and your legs would probably give out in fear before you'd have a chance to kneel before his Zod. The rest of the cast is equally as brilliant, or at least tolerable. Yes, Fishburne is Afro-American - and it still doesn't matter.

The settings aren't of particular note, except Krypton. This is a planet recognizable as one, with an ecosystem and a definitively ancient culture. My only complaint is we don't see more if it.

Except for one little twitch in the music, the score is excellent. A Homepage member postulated that no one will walk out of the theater remembering Zimmer's main score. Well, I remember it, and it works.

There is a sombre tone, to be honest, and this was something that worried many fans. While there is a melancholy, it's suitably well-measured and unfolds to reveal a heroic centerpiece.

There isn't too much more to say without spoiling the film. In time I may chime in with a full review, but suffice it to say right now that Man of Steel is the best on screen rendition of Superman since 1978. Dare I say it...? Yes. It's even better.
 
Honestly Cavill nailed the Smallville/Pre Superman scenes. The fact that his voice is perfect for Superman completely mops the floor with Welling.

By the second trailer I could already tell Cavill was an excellent choice for Supes.

Amazing casting on par with Hemsworth and RDJ. :up:
 
By the second trailer I could already tell Cavill was an excellent choice for Supes.

Amazing casting on par with Hemsworth and RDJ. :up:

I'd put Jackman and Evans in that list too
 
Just got back, and I'm about to say what I've been waiting to say for months now. Okay? Here we go...

SUPERMAN IS BACK! AND THIS TIME, IT'S FOR GOOD.

This was great! I loved it! The critics sucked: this film had humor; I felt for the characters, and they and the story was developed. The crowd clapped at the end. It was like an event.

Better than Superman Returns...which would be a given, anyway. But still.

It will get its money back. We WILL get a sequel.

I will see it again.
 
There are things I love about it, but there’s a lot of clumsiness to it too. It feels like a compromise. The action is insane, but I wanted a touch more depth.
 
a few tidbits from my experience:

- I think our preconceived notions of "our" Clark Kent/Superman played an effect in some of the so so critic reviews. I actually have such an investment in Smallville's Clark that the first hour of Man of Steel I couldn't help but catch myself thinking of Henry as an imposter. It took Welling ten years to earn the uniform and Cavill gets it tossed to him after 30-40 minutes.
- It seemed like Jor-El predestined him to be Earth's role model. I would have rather had 15 minutes of fewer action scenes to show the formation of Clark's moral compass.
- I would have liked a little more restraint to the destruction in the action sequences. I just kept imagining all of the collateral damage that was occurring during the city scenes. I would have preferred Clark to bring the fight to a more deserted locale.
- The known identity of Superman by Lois is an interesting gamechanger as it occurs at a slower tempo in every other iteration.
- The fighting scenes were unreal as they were so brutal and lightning fast. faora almost seemed to warp around when taking down the army soldiers.
- The ending was a welcome conclusion as it brought us back to more familiar ground to which a sequel can build on.
- Overall I was pleasantly surprised after a half week of negativity from critics as forum posters. Add more character, warmth, and positivity to the sequel and we will be in prime territory.
u need to re watch it get the highlighted portion right. :D
 
This was one of the biggest dumbest movies I've ever seen. It's sheer meat head bafoonery making the weakest attempt to be something more but failing miserably. I can't believe this movie was even allowed to exist without anyone involved actually recognizing its grossly obvious faults. It was just so bad, I'm at a loss of words.
 
There are things I love about it, but there’s a lot of clumsiness to it too. It feels like a compromise. The action is insane, but I wanted a touch more depth.

Maybe you'll get that from a sequel, the big thing here is, is this movie a good starting point? It doesn't have to be great (although in my bias opinion it will be for me) it just has to be good enough for them to do more.
 
Just saw it.

Y'know what this movie was like....it was like a new TV show was having a 2-episode premiere, but you missed the first episode. So then you're watching a lot of stuff unfold in a rather abbreviated fashion, and the whole time you feel like you're missing some essential parts of the experience. And now you're left with only the second episode, and you're still wondering if it's skipping parts. In fact the whole thing felt very TV, and not really good TV...like a serviceable new series SyFy or something. Like....

Superman: The Next Generation...or not even that, more like Deep Space Nine.

One reviewer referred to the film as 'soulless'. I don't know if I'd go that far, but it sure made it hard to feel a pulse. Even the effects looked rather budget-package by today's standards. It's pretty clear with Nolan from the last two films that he emptied his superhero tank with TDK. This movie was not better than Iron Man, Batman, Spiderman, Xmen, Avengers, and it was ultimately only marginally better than SR. In terms of 'putting Supes back atop the superhero totem pole', sadly this wasn't even close.

Cavill was very good as Superman, but unfortunately the movie doesn't really deserve a sequel, storywise. Strangely enough, I see this making only slightly more money than SR, but in a shorter theater run. I feel kinda' bad for dedicated Supes fans who waited and kept the faith, this felt like table scraps.

C+
 
Unless this somehow makes a ton of money, like record-breaking....I don't see there being a sequel.
 
Chris Bumbrat at JoBlo gave it a 9/10

REVIEW: You gotta love it when a big tent-pole blockbuster that's been hyped and hyped for well over a year finally comes along and lives up to all your expectations. For me, that's exactly what MAN OF STEEL does. I've been anxious to see this new take on the Superman mythos ever since I heard Christopher Nolan was on-board as a producer. Anyone who's read my reviews knows I'm a big fan of his, although having seen this I suspect his name being so prominently attached to the film was more for marketing purposes and branding than anything else. That said, MAN OF STEEL is as bold a departure from the previous Superman movies as BATMAN BEGINS was compared to the eighties/nineties Batman series, in that this is not the light take on the character we grew up with. While a controversial move that's already dividing fans, to my way of thinking, this was really the only possible way Superman could have ever been made relevant to a generation that- with the reception to SUPERMAN RETURNS- already proved that they weren't interested in a light, traditional take on the character.

For all the hype about this being Nolan's Superman, his influence is really only felt in the darker tone, and I imagine he also had a lot to do getting Hans Zimmer to provide the incredible percussion-heavy score (itself as different from the John Williams soundtracks as this is from the Donner films). Make no mistake though, MAN OF STEEL is a full-on Zack Snyder film, and if the fans respond positively to this, he's the one who deserves a lot of the credit (as does writer David S. Goyer). While Snyder stumbled badly with SUCKER PUNCH, his filmography up to now has been pretty good, although to me this feels like the best thing he's ever done, even next to 300.
Right from an incredible action-heavy prologue on Krypton, that plunges Russell Crowe's Jor-El into a frantic battle to save his newborn son from Zod, it's clear MAN OF STEEL is going to be a roller-coaster ride you need to strap-yourself in for. Crowe and Ayelet Zurer as Superman's Kryptonian parents make a perfect contrast to Kevin Costner and Diane Lane's earthier take on the Kents, and while his screen-time may be limited, Crowe's really at his best here, bringing the same gravitas to the part that he does in something like GLADIATOR, and seems surprisingly at home in full-on sci-fi fantasy mode, shooting laser guns, and riding flying creatures across Krypton (this whole part of the movie is like something out of HEAVY METAL- in a good way).
Once we get to Earth, the traditional way of telling Superman's origins is dropped, as we pick up on Henry Cavill's Clark Kent as an adult on the verge of discovering his roots, flashing back (LOST-style) to his picturesque upbringing in Smallville, under the nurturing guidance of his adoptive parents. Diane Lane exudes warmth as Ma Kent, while the ideally cast Kevin Costner gives a truly amazing, heartfelt performance as Jonathan Kent.

But what about Superman himself? While Christopher Reeve will always be Superman to me in the same way Sean Connery will always be James Bond, he really makes the role his own similar to how Christian Bale did in BATMAN BEGINS and Daniel Craig did for Bond in CASINO ROYALE. While a relatively fresh-face, Cavill carries MAN OF STEEL like a movie-star, and owns the screen every time he's on it. Physically, he's the perfect match for the part, with a strong jawline, jet black hair, and a truly super heroic physique. Even better, he perfectly conveys the compassion that defines the character, with Snyder getting a lot of mileage out of the Christ parallels that have always existed for the character (it's no coincidence he's 33 when he dons the cape, the same age as Jesus Christ at the crucifixion). Despite the fact that this is a much darker adventure for Superman than we're used to, the character is still portrayed as the altruistic, noble character we love. In other words, he's still recognizable, and while the movie may be dark and brooding, the character is not.
Meanwhile, Amy Adams' take on Lois Lane is the most modern the character's ever been, with her being the first actress to ever play the part that feels like she actually could be a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist (here just back from being embedded in Iraq). Like Diane Lane, Adams exudes warmth, and while her romance with Superman is definitely put on the back-burner in favor of action, I imagine it will evolve over the course of the series. All in all, she feels like an excellent choice for the character. Ditto Laurence Fishburne as certainly the toughest Perry White of all time.

As for Michael Shannon, wow. He's absolutely one of the scariest superhero villains I've ever seen. While he's ferocious, Shannon doesn't play him as unhinged. In a huge departure from the power-mad take on the part by Terrence Stamp, Shannon's Zod was bred to be exactly what he is, so he's not played as some kind of raving maniac.He's a tyrant, but that's what he was made to be. The same goes for his right-hand woman, Antje Traue as Faora, who's not the psychotic Sarah Douglas/Ursa substitute we may have expected.
Of course, MAN OF STEEL will certainly divide fans. A lot of people may not like the fact that Superman's been made into such a dark film, but again I can't see any other way it would have worked. In some ways SUPERMAN RETUNRS proved that nowadays audiences are too cynical for the traditional approach to the character. Snyder's made a Superman movie that's absolutely jam-packed with action, and the set-pieces are breathtaking. The last hour of the movie is essentially all action, and yes, MAN OF STEEL is another blockbuster like THE AVENGERS/ TRANSFORMERS that has a body count that must be in the millions (the destruction heaped upon Metropolis is practically biblical) . The final battle between Zod and Superman is especially good, and surprisingly violent, pushing the boundaries of PG-13 in a way I would have never expected from a Superman movie. Also- don't expect any WATCHMEN/300-style undercranking. Snyder's approach here is more grounded.
My only real criticism for MAN OF STEEL is that once again, we have a 3D movie that doesn't feel the slightest bit three-dimensional. This could (and should) have been in 2D, and more often than not I forgot I was watching something in 3D, although I should note I saw the Real-D version, and not the IMAX 3D edition.
Otherwise, I absolutely loved MAN OF STEEL. While there's always room for improvement (I'd like more Clark/Lois in the next movie, and the scene where Superman first gets his super-suit is almost hilariously abrupt) this is remarkably assured for a first film in what's bound to be an incredibly successful series. Sure, the reaction to this is mixed so far. Folks will come around. Cavill is our generation's Superman, and he's here to stay.
 
Last edited:
Just saw it.

Y'know what this movie was like....it was like a new TV show was having a 2-episode premiere, but you missed the first episode. So then you're watching a lot of stuff unfold in a rather abbreviated fashion, and the whole time you feel like you're missing some essential parts of the experience. And now you're left with only the second episode, and you're still wondering if it's skipping parts. In fact the whole thing felt very TV, and not really good TV...like a serviceable new series SyFy or something. Like....


Superman: The Next Generation...or not even that, more like Deep Space Nine.

One reviewer referred to the film as 'soulless'. I don't know if I'd go that far, but it sure made it hard to feel a pulse. Even the effects looked rather budget-package by today's standards. It's pretty clear with Nolan from the last two films that he emptied his superhero tank with TDK. This movie was not better than Iron Man, Batman, Spiderman, Xmen, Avengers, and it was ultimately only marginally better than SR. In terms of 'putting Supes back atop the superhero totem pole', sadly this wasn't even close.

Cavill was very good as Superman, but unfortunately the movie doesn't really deserve a sequel, storywise. Strangely enough, I see this making only slightly more money than SR, but in a shorter theater run. I feel kinda' bad for dedicated Supes fans who waited and kept the faith, this felt like table scraps.

C+
Nor sure what you mean here? I thought the narrative flowed very well, and I like that they used all four of his parents to pick up each bit of it. Beautiful storytelling imo. Don't feel like I missed a thing. I love that Clark is about to get his push from [BLACKOUT]Johnathan and then he dies. Only for Jor-El to pick up the baton.[/BLACKOUT]
 
Last edited:
I am amazed and impressed right now. I'm tired, but dammit I'll say this needs a sequel!! I mean, it was definitely on par with Batman Begins in terms of depth and execution, but with BB, I felt there was a lot more drag in certain places. This movie kept the appropriate pace and didn't lose momentum. I don't understand the criticism that this movie is "soulless" it was anything but. I'd give it a 9. It's not quite a 10, but I think 8 is too harsh.
 
Nor sure what you mean here? I thought the narrative flowed very well, and I like that they used all four of his parents to pick up each bit of it. Beautiful storytelling imo. Don't feel like I missed a thing.

It felt veery A-B-C-etc, but leaving out some vowels, if you will. Again, very much like a TV episode that they had to wrap up within the hour. That's the thing, we didn't 'miss' anything, but there always felt like a lot was missing. It was pretty flat.

Again, clearly not better than most other Superhero movies out now....sadly sort of re-affirming the idea of Superman being surpassed as a character.
 
just got back from seeing it. its actually quite good, but i can see where people think its too action packed. one scene made me go "i cant believe they did that." but all in all its what we wanted. an action packed superman movie, with somewhat of a realistic feel to it. plus theres a lot of easter eggs; certain people exist in this universe, and it kinda makes it so much better because of it.
8/10
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,319
Messages
22,085,086
Members
45,884
Latest member
hiner112
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"