spider-neil
spins a web any size!
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2004
- Messages
- 18,205
- Reaction score
- 306
- Points
- 73
if the child is pete's then I am officially ambivalent about SM4 and the superhero movie I am most looking forward to is thor.
I don't think they would bother about the hair color if he was just an extra... The fact that they specifically asked for identical twins with a specific hair color gives us this info:
Two twins: He has some considerable ammount of screentime. He isn't just an extra in the back.
Red hair: He is an actual character with a role if he is to have such a specific requested trait.
Showing the movie goer the flashback is not the same as saying the character is remembering the events. It's simply exposition material to help the person viewing the movie catch up; like the first page of most comic books.
Red Hair... hmmm, who has Red Hair... oh yeah, MJ.... so, to me it's gotta be either MJ's new baby brother... or possibly a cousin, or other relative....
more than likely.
that what I was going to say...My friend came up with interesting idea... maybe it's Vulture-toddler?
Probably... I am thinking MJ is looking after the kid and maybe she goes off for acting and Parker ends up having to look after him. Prep him for fatherhood or whatever. Its a lame ass plot device IMO, if it's supposed to be the new responsibility lesson for Parker.
that what I was going to say...
(idk about in the comics, but, young Toomes, did have red hair, in TAS)
I wasn’t going to suggest it as a serious idea, but, just to add the random speculation, in the same lines as baby-Carnage, or MJ's bastard child...
though, it could make sense, if say they were doing the youth draining storyline, an at some point in the movie, it backfires on him and turns him in into a child (not that I think it a good idea either, but, it still beats lil-Carny, or spider-kid, in my book)
Yea, I'm aware of that but that was not my point. My point is: How can you justify someone being the way they are with an event that took place in a period that they aren't able to remember at all?
Trauma occurs on a later age, not so early. We aren't able to remember most stuff from our 2 year period.
So showing a flashback of a Kassidy doesn't make sense for me unless it's from a period that he can clearly remember and draw hate from.
Even more likely, the kid is just an extra.
But it does make sense after reading Raimi's attitude to the growth of the characters:
"What we're trying to do right now is really understand the journey Peter is going to go on this time and have the villain maybe be a counter to that growth, something that he has to overcome," Raimi said. "Or maybe he has to grow in a way to overcome the villain, because there always seem to be stories of coming of age, of a young man growing up and learning things about life, so once we are identifying the exact movement that Peter has to grow to, I think the villainand we're trying this right now; we're trying to choose a villain based on who would be the proper counter to that growth, so we really have dramatic conflict."
Source
I seriously think he hints at Vulture. If so, now I realize why they needed 3 highly qualified screenwriters to bring Vulture's complicated story to life.
But does Vulture show a counter to personal growth? The Vulture is supposed to be pretty old, isn't he? If we want to counter personal growth and maturity, should not the villian then be someone ruled by emotion? Someone who cannot control their base instincts? Someone very child-like in that respect, or mentally unstable?
What are you talking about?
Who said the flashback has anything to do with trauma? Why could it not be simple exposition? As a matter of fact, to go with your idea, he could be shown to be a normal, healthy 2 year old, THEN the trauma starts at some later point.
But does Vulture show a counter to personal growth? The Vulture is supposed to be pretty old, isn't he? If we want to counter personal growth and maturity, should not the villian then be someone ruled by emotion? Someone who cannot control their base instincts? Someone very child-like in that respect, or mentally unstable?
Could Kassidy somehow lose his child (the redheaded toddler), and become Carnage as a result of the emotional turmoil?
it wouldn't so much as being a counter to growth, more of a increase in growth, as in physical aging, growthBut does Vulture show a counter to personal growth? The Vulture is supposed to be pretty old, isn't he? If we want to counter personal growth and maturity, should not the villian then be someone ruled by emotion? Someone who cannot control their base instincts? Someone very child-like in that respect, or mentally unstable?
Could Kassidy somehow lose his child (the redheaded toddler), and become Carnage as a result of the emotional turmoil?
Billy's a good bet, please no Cassidy...