How did Clark Kent know about the scout ship in the Arctic? What lead him there??
Didn't Clark over hear a conversation between Lois and some guy about some object in the Artic? So, he got on as a extra helper on the expedition.How did Clark Kent know about the scout ship in the Arctic? What lead him there??
Well said. I just don't get the hate for the 'O, Snap' sequence with Zod, that's how the writers chose to do the story, so be it. I had no problem with Superman killing at all and all these hypothetical counter arguments of what should of been done or written are mute. The story is what it is, can't change it now because a few fan boys are unhappy about the 'No Kill Policy' not being followed. This isn't your Dads SupermanYet the doom of the mentality of comic book heroes who have some "no kill policy" is that the persons writing this scenario constantly need to create fiction that allows them to have this luxury...IE there is always a Dues Ex Machina that prevents killing blows.
The reality of the situation is that men and women who take up force against violent criminals may need to kill the criminals to stop them.
..and this is not some shattering of "reality" or of the fantasy of the "no kill" ethos..in fact it is uplifting to the real heroes who go out to stop violence and have had to kill to stop a threat.
To kill under these conditions doesnt make you a monster..and it is NOT your choice. You did your job to stop the threat, and you did so only after exhausting your other means. This plays out brilliantly on the film.
Didn't Clark over hear a conversation between Lois and some guy about some object in the Artic? So, he got on as a extra helper on the expedition.
This isn't your Dads Superman![]()
Again, Not enough Faora, they just needed to do more sequences of just her looking damn fine and sexy in that armor![]()
Well, now that the film has premiered it's time to get into the dirty little details. While many people love Man of Steel (especially on this board), there are many others whose expectations were not met, who have things they would change, or outright hate the film. This is not a place for a "You're wrong, I'm right!" argument to break out, rather, it's for those who feel unfulfilled by what they saw and and would ultimately change things given the chance.
Personally, I would give Man of Steel a 7/10 upon my first viewing. It's not a horrible film, but it definitely did not live up the advertising which had been created for it, nor did it live up to my hope of having a legitimately inventive and exciting beginning of a DC Shared Universe, unlike Iron Man. Here are some nits, picks, and complaints to get us started off.
-The opening shot of Kal El being born is gorgeous, and a genuinely fantastic way to begin this saga, especially since so much of it hinges on the idea of natural, not genetically manipulated birth. However, the Krypton scenes that follow border on nonsensical and way too rushed. If we had just had maybe one or two scenes prior to the council scene, establishing Jor El and General Zod as genuine allies with one tragic difference in world views, it would have given so much more weight to the Jor El's death, Zod's incarceration, and the destruction of Krypton. Ultimately it just feels like one rushed action setpiece to the next, setting up the very plotty MacGuffin in the Codex. Say what you want about the original Superman's version of Krypton, the silly outfits and fake looking sets, Donner gives it mournful pace and a wonderful, wise Jor El in Marlon Brando who really sells the importance of the moment. TELLING rather than SHOWING is generally a big complaint I have about David Goyer's script.
-Our first time spent with Clark. Again, the entire sequence on the boat is so, so rushed and could have been used to show us who Clark is at the beginning of the story, rather than an excuse for a setpiece. What if we had a couple scenes on the boat with Clark interacting with the crew, sharing stories, making jokes, just having a simple conversation? The human element felt very lost in Man of Steel, and scenes where we get a clearer sense of the man Clark has become would have been great peppered throughout his beginning journey. Also, the actual oil rig destruction itself was a let down as a setpiece. It was basically 30 seconds of Clark holding up something heavy. I'm not asking for a MASSIVE action scene here, but every bit of action should progress as a story, with a beginning, middle, and end. This was one long note without any variance.
-This is skipping ahead quite a bit, but the outfit reveal. It's presented to Clark without any explanation, and it comes after a massive info dump of exposition by Jor El. And then almost immediately after, he is suddenly in the suit and bouncing around. Clark has no reaction to seeing the suit, wearing it, anything. It's simply something he has to put on now, thanks Dad! It should be treated as mythic, like Jason acquiring the Golden Fleece. Even Green Lantern handled Hal Jordan getting the ring and "becoming" a costumed superhero better. Batman Begins had 20 minutes of buildup, with Bruce slowing building his suit and then the dock fight hidden in shadows, building up to his "I'm Batman" headbutt. The whole transition of Clark Kent to Superman wasn't handled particularly well, but I think missing this moment is endemic of the problems with the whole movie.
I have many more floating around in my head, but I thought I'd start off the conversation and maybe pepper them in as people post. Again, this is not meant as a hatefest, merely a place to vent frustrations. Better luck in 2015, Superman (aka, please give David Goyer something else besides Man of Steel 2 to do).
About Zod terraforming Mars...let's not forget, they may want to conserve Mars to explain J'onn J'onzz's origins (and that's if the Martian Manhunter is part of the JL roster). And plus the answer is really simple, Mars has barren resources compared to Earth. Why terraform something that's incomplete as opposed to one that's complete? (especially since planetary engineering is not certain if adding CO2 is going to help a planet terraform).
Here's the real question. Why did it need to be terraformed in the first place? Other than some brief inconvenience the sensory over load they were much more powerful under earth's natural atmosphere. So why change it? Jor'el implied that his and Laura's fate was tied to Krypton and initially the suits also implied that they couldn't survive in earth's atmosphere, like Kal was special because of being born naturally. By the end of the film we see that's not remotely true. So why terraform it in the first place?
How did Clark Kent know about the scout ship in the Arctic? What lead him there??
He heard the two military guys talking about a strange object and an investigation going at the base when he was working at the bar, it's right before he confronts the truck driver.
Yeah, it reminded me of Thor hearing about Mjolnir from the guys in the coffee shop, only in this it made less sense because Thor knew what he was looking for. How the heck would Clark have known the strange object had to do with him?
Some complaints I'm going to try to appease. (Mostly for my own benefit).
Why didn't Zod terraform Mars? Truly great question. I wouldn't be surprised if we see this on "How it should have ended." But if Zod terraformed and populated Mars, effectively turning it into Krypton, do you honestly think he would have let Earth be? Do you think mankind would have been cool with superpowered aliens living next door? Besides, his goal didn't seem to be exclusively salvation for his race (despite him saying so) he came to Earth to find the son of Jor-El. I assume he wanted some revenge.
What was the whole point of his "drifting" .... I missed it or was it not explained?
What was the whole point of his "drifting" .... I missed it or was it not explained?
What do you mean by "drifting"? Sorry , english isn't my first language.
drifting as in "wandering" place to place. He was trying to find his place and purpose. He would have continued to drift had he not heard about the ship in the ice.
Some complaints I'm going to try to appease. (Mostly for my own benefit).
Someone had an issue with the ship found in the arctic having a suit with the symbol of El on it. My best assumption is that in addition to the reasons mentioned in the film, They also chose to send Kal to Earth because the ship sent to Earth was commissioned by ancestors of the House of El.
The "millions" killed in the city. I'm not sure if that number is accurate. It was a pretty localized city block that was destroyed (and I will admit utterly destroyed) but I'd stick to the (tens of) thousands. People knew there were aliens attacking. I like to assume common sense prevailed. And I realize it's not how it happens in the comics, but when a powerhouse comes to Metropolis to fight Superman, this is how it would go in real life... Better than Zod annihilating billions.
Tornado death. This one bothered me slightly too. But his father wanted to prove that his secret was more important than one man's life. Also, obvious lessons about self-sacrifice. It does state this pretty clearly in the movie. "My father died believing the world wasn't ready."
Why didn't Zod terraform Mars? Truly great question. I wouldn't be surprised if we see this on "How it should have ended." But if Zod terraformed and populated Mars, effectively turning it into Krypton, do you honestly think he would have let Earth be? Do you think mankind would have been cool with superpowered aliens living next door? Besides, his goal didn't seem to be exclusively salvation for his race (despite him saying so) he came to Earth to find the son of Jor-El. I assume he wanted some revenge.