What fills me with positivity is that we will have an x-men movie under one unified vision rather than several different viewpoints meshed together into one single script. I'm curious to see what Knberg's directing style is like. I've never seen it. I've tired of Singer. Want something different.
That's probably the first time I've heard of anyone complaining that the X-men mainline films were "several different viewpoints meshed together." (Yes the franchise is notorious for its continuity issues but that's not because its director is one of many writers.)
Even if other fans did complain that the writer and director are two different people (which, again is a thing people have never complained about) I'd be interested to hear why the heck they'd be ok with that "unified vision" coming from the hack who wrote X3, Fant4stic and Apocalypse. After all, it's been a consensus amongst fans that those three, along with Wolverine 1, are some of worst in the franchise.
So Kinberg probably wouldn't have been their first (or 6th) choice. Unlike you, most people can see Kinberg is as much to blame for those films. I'd hazard a guess that some X-men film fans are only ok with that hack now, and would defend him, because he's working on their favourite franchise.
What I'm trying to point out is that there was no need for Kinberg to be on the set of Fantastic4 when they already had a team there taking over reshoot duties. That's why he was working on Apocalypse. It seems you are simply trying to place blame where there isn't one. Fantastic4 was Josh Trank's failure as the director. Who again....you love to overlook.
Were you not one of the many people who have praised Kinberg for being a great producer? And yet here you are saying he wasn't and did not need to be on the F4 set. That might be a valid excuse for a hired writer. But no, Kinberg was producer and writer of the film. "Genre Films" aka "Kinberg Genre" is credited for the film. For a very troubled film with a very high price tag, you don't think the studio would've wanted all-hands-on-deck, especially its producer? Kinberg is also one of Hollywood's "top" script doctors. They were bound to have someone with Kinberg's "talents" on-hand.
But no, you say he was never there.
So why is it you want to place Kinberg as far away from the Fant4stic set as possible? Is it because you don't want to admit that he shares the blame for Trank's Fant4stic? Nice try.