Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 6
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]523535[/split]
Happy Independence Day, Guest!
Well I for one would be fine with waiting for Dark Phoenix until X8.![]()
Unless they entirely remove the cosmic setting and have it set on Earth. But then I can't see why they would choose Supernova as a title.
Yeah I'd still rather see Gambit in the X-Men movies rather than his own movie, but it seems like a solo movie is the only way we'll ever get him.And thought this won't be the case, Mutant Massacre would be a way to introduce Gambit, even though I cringe at the image of Tatum standing next to the younger X-Men. I dunno, maybe he's just been around longer and in the shadows while working for Sinister.
I'll admit that made me laugh.TO SPACE! *hops into rocket and blasts off*
Well to be fair it probably will be set a certain amount on earth since they can't start the movie with them heading off into space when there needs to be far more set up to the whole space and aliens thing then just TO SPACE! *hops into rocket and blasts off*
ComingSoon.net: They just announced you as the director of X-Men: Supernova, which is very exciting…
Simon Kinberg: They didn’t announce it, somebody broke a story about it that’s premature, but we have been talking about what the next X-Men movie would be since post-production on the last X-Men movie. We are prepping the film, can’t say much more than that, but we’re excited to get back into telling the story of the mainland X-Men.
CS: If you did, hypothetically, get to direct for the first time, you’ve produced a lot of stuff and you certainly know your way around a set. How would you describe the directorial style you would bring to the movie?
Kinberg: I’ve had the good fortune of working with a lot of good directors, from Bryan Singer to Ridley Scott to Sir Kenneth Branagh, and I’ve also had the opportunity to work with directors that aren’t as good and I learned a lot of lessons from those directors as well. I really like my job, I really like writing and producing movies. If that was my job for the rest of my life I’d be a very lucky man. My directorial style would probably be very similar to my writing and producing style, which is very collaborative.
CS: As far as the previous film, X-Men: Apocalypse, there seems to have been a split, in that the people who love the comic books really appreciated it and the people who are fans of the more grounded movies thought it went a little too far in the comic book direction. What lessons did you learn from Apocalypse?
Kinberg: As the writer of it, I thought when we started the movie and when I wrote the movie that we were telling the story of a family splitting apart and coming back together. In the final movie its in there, but it’s a little buried, and the movie on the surface became about a guy who wanted to destroy the world. The guy that wanted to destroy the world is a superhero movie from 25, 30 years ago. Today’s superhero movies that we love the most –the “Dark Knight” movies, “Guardians of the Galaxy,” the first “Iron Man” movie, those are movies about human beings in relatable circumstances that happen to have super powers. I think “Apocalypse” became more about global stakes than human stakes. That’s the lesson I learned from the movie, that human and personal stakes always trump global stakes. It’s something that Bryan did, if you go back to the first “X-Men” movie, what Magneto’s trying to do is something global in scale, but ultimately it’s about saving Rogue. The movie is about Wolverine and Rogue, a guy who doesn’t want to be connected to anybody and a girl who’s lost. They find each other, and in finding each other they find each other with the X-Men. It was a brilliant way of telling that story. I think with “Apocalypse” we got away from that a little bit. Maybe we all got a little enamored in the possibility of seeing the world get destroyed and do some things in terms of scale and scope that we haven’t done in the X-Men movies. Scale and scope don’t matter. Audiences today know it’s fake, they’ve seen the world blow up a million times in video games and movies.
Read more at http://www.comingsoon.net/movies/ne...directing-x-men-supernova#6O8mb54GjQ27dfLt.99
I'm fine with that but they should develop them first and then do Dark Phoenix, Kinberg already made it sound like Dark Phoenix isn't a guarantee.Kinberg word make me think Supernova will focus more on relationship (Cyclop/Jean) than space opera.
A draft is of course already written, but since they're just now negotiating with the actors there is a possibility extensive rewrites will be in order.
That’s the lesson I learned from the movie, that human and personal stakes always trump global stakes. It’s something that Bryan did, if you go back to the first “X-Men” movie, what Magneto’s trying to do is something global in scale, but ultimately it’s about saving Rogue. The movie is about Wolverine and Rogue, a guy who doesn’t want to be connected to anybody and a girl who’s lost. They find each other, and in finding each other they find each other with the X-Men. It was a brilliant way of telling that story. I think with “Apocalypse” we got away from that a little bit. Maybe we all got a little enamored in the possibility of seeing the world get destroyed and do some things in terms of scale and scope that we haven’t done in the X-Men movies. Scale and scope don’t matter. Audiences today know it’s fake, they’ve seen the world blow up a million times in video games and movies.
My directorial style would probably be very similar to my writing and producing style, which is very collaborative
What I'm getting of all of this is that Kinberg is a good talker. A good writer and director is an entirely different story. They have to prove it with actions, not words.I'm still hesitant on Kinberg writing and directing, but this does sound like there were lessons learned from Apocalypse.
I'm happy that Kinberg realizes what went wrong with Apocalypse, and admits that it wasn't perfect. That's promising, at least. Still I hope it's a third party directing this.
Simon on the idea of directing and X-Men: apocalypse
In total agreement.I talked about that. Kinberg isn't a visionary director like Singer, Nolan, Cameron or Reeves. Thoses guys want to have control on everything.
Kinberg will just hire right people and let them do what they want. The second unit will have a lot of work to do. He is more a producer so i will not be surprised if Supernova is the most faithful X-Men movie . But i am afraid it could be without soul.
Kinberg word make me think Supernova will focus more on relationship (Cyclop/Jean) than space opera.
Same here on all fronts.
As long as he knows how to approach future movies I'm okay with that. If the next movie still fails, then directing is not for him.