Sequels X-Men Sequel - Part 5

Status
Not open for further replies.
[FONT=&quot]Would they recast Wolverine for X-men DP or no more Wolverine[/FONT]
 
Producer Hutch Parker on recasting wolverine

"I think for the moment our focus really is on other characters," he explained to the publication. "I think there's a part for all of us that feels like Logan, as played by Hugh, is the definitive performance of that character. And I think we're all a little hesitant at the idea of rebooting it in any way. So, for the moment we're going to look at – there's so much else explore in the [X-Men] Universe and to play with.

http://screenrant.com/x-men-hugh-jackman-wolverine-recast/
 
Last edited:
A smart man.

it was never going to happen for dark phoenix.it may come eventully

if they are serious though the out for them is keep x-men films with first class & APocalypse cast in 1990's.no more time hopping.new mutants may or may not be set around this time or before dark phoenix.

set X-force after logan and have x-23 fill wolverine's void as part of X-force.

my wish is for fox not to erase logan by having cable around.they have done that enough.and no stupid cable goes from present to future to pick up x-23 to take her to present.and since kinberg isn't writing x-force then maybe we can avoid this.

let's stop here pretending that a reboot is even a possibilty.it clearly isn't.how many times does it has to be said.and it's not because i hate reboots.they have said it enough.new tieline is closest anytime soon there will be a reboot.
 
Last edited:
I doubt they'll recast Logan anytime soon.

If anything, Jackman might give it a few years off and then come back to the role or something.
 
Jackman could miss the role and come back but i have a feeling that after Logan he will be even more reluctant because it was so highly praised that he pretty much ended on the highest note possible and that might not be possible to get again.

As for a recast i believe them when they say they have no plans on recasting wolverine and i also believe at this point a recast wouldn't be easy on the audience either.

It also depends on how they treat the character absence from the franchise because if they continue to use jackman visually in maybe more deadpool jokes or photos and stuff then they will be delaying a recast to the point where it would be very difficult for anyone to accept anyone new.

And i wouldn't put it past anyone to do that either.
 
Last edited:
I don't know that it's an excuse for anything. It's one of the two most identifiable versions of the character for audiences as well.

I'll just leave a quote here from someone I think you'd listen to:

"You are confusing the real world reasons JLaw
"...appears as JLAW.

So what's the "story reason" that she has to morph into JLaw in Vietnam after rescuing Havok etc al, in Paris trying to seduce the Vietnamese general, in Germany when rescuing Nightcrawler, in Caliban's lair trying to pawn off Nightcrawler, and on and on.

Not very stealthy, as you claim.

She has been recognized once, that I can recall, when she was unconscious and could not shapeshift.

What's your point?

You need to rewatch the movie you're vehemently defending.

She called herself "Grace", but she looked suspiciously like Rebecca Romijn...which is also suspiciously what Raven looked like in THE LAST STAND.

She also looked suspiciously like Rebecca Romijn in bed trying to seduce Michael Fassbender in First Class 40 years before she presumably is supposed to look like that. What? Is she a clairvoyant too? She knew what she was gonna look like in 2003?

Maybe she has Destiny's powers. LOL

The obvious answer here is that Singer never meant for Rebecca Romijn's Grace to be Raven. I'd sooner believe him over Ratner.
 
Last edited:
oh, Stan Lee I love ya, But you should spoken age's as other have. oh well .




You tell 'em, Stan!



[FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Decades ago, Marvel sold the film rights for a number of characters to a number of film studios. Marvel themselves had no interest in making superhero movies at the time so they let other studios like Sony and Fox handle that for them.

Some of the characters sold off are the life and blood of Marvel, Spider-Man, the X-Men, the Fantastic Four, and Universal and Marvel have a bit of a confusing deal for The Hulk (he's allowed to be used in ensemble films, but not solo movies, hence why he's being used to team up with Thor in Thor: Ragnarok as a loophole).

Marvel and Sony made a deal to share the film rights for Spider-Man in 2015 which lead to him appearing in Captain America: Civil War last year and an upcoming solo movie in July of this year. The character will appear in a couple more Avengers movies and a sequel to Spider-Man: Homecoming later down the road.


Marvel and Fox, however, have never been able to land a deal for X-Men or the Fantastic Four meaning a large number of major characters are completely unusable. Fox also owns the rights to Sliver Surfer and Galactus. Marvel has expressed interest in gaining the characters back but they've been unable to strike a deal.


Fans have understandably been annoyed by this and so has one other person of interest, Stan Lee, the creator of almost all of those characters.
Yesterday, I got to sit in on a Q&A with Stan Lee in Des Moines, Iowa and a fan asked him why Fox and Marvel can't come to an agreement. He wasn't specifically aware of all of the particular conditions of the deal or if they'll be able to make it right but he wants them in the movies too.

"We should have all of our characters under Marvel," Lee stated. "Remind me on my way home to do something about that. We'll do our best." He said smiling as the crowd applauded.

Obviously, he was probably half-joking as it would require a lot of convincing and money to make it happen but he genuinely appeared to want the characters under Marvel's control again.


It was also hinted at that a major new character will appear in Avengers: Infinity War. When asked if he could give us any details, his assistant whispered in his ear and told him he can't discuss it in-depth. He said that a new character (maybe even multiple) would appear and it would please the fans.
Avengers: Infinity War will hit theaters next May with the untitled sequel releasing in May of 2019.
[/FONT]

IN THIS ARTICLE

[FONT=&quot]Tags:
FANTASTIC FOURMARVELSPIDER-MANSTAN LEEX-MEN
[/FONT]


source: http://www.gamezone.com/
GZ_logo-e60bbbfb8172ed2476fe1c65210e382e.svg
 
Originally Posted by GuestStar2004
I don't see why that is revelant ^^
relevant... oh if it's to your argument about mystique and her actress . it has nothing to do with that. so don't worry about it.


it's about what keven fiege put last week which I put up in this thread prior as well. anything past that I don't care for now .

pots : #442

page :>> 18

this same thread





Comic Book Resources

1 hr ·

avengers-vs-x-men-marvel-studios-kevin-feige-header.jpg


Feige Open to an Avengers, X-Men Movie Crossover
3 hours agoMOVIE NEWS

The Marvel Studios boss said the big screen pairing is unlikely, but you never know what the future has in store.
Read more


Quote:

avengers-vs-x-men-marvel-studios-kevin-feige-header.jpg





Marvel Studios head Kevin Feige might have ruled out any potential team up between Fox and Marvel, but that doesn’t necessarily mean he’s given up on the idea of the the X-Men or the Fantastic Four ever meeting the Avengers in the Marvel Cinematic Universe entirely.




In a recent interview with Jeremy Lasky, co-founder of Perception, the animation and deign studio responsible for most of the technology animation in Marvel Studios films, as well as the studio’s recent logo redesign, Feige broached the possibility that characters not already in the MCU could eventually find their way there in the future.




RELATED: Kevin Feige Teases A ‘New Age’ of The Marvel Cinematic Universe




“My goal is to replicate the experience that, you know, comic book fans have reading the books up on the screen and we’ve been able to accomplish that beyond my wildest dreams over the last ten years,” Feige said.




The Marvel boss went to discuss one of the most notable long shot acquisitions in the studio’s history: a certain Wall-Crawler who has made his way into two mainline Avengers movies.




“Spidey in Civil War and in the upcoming Infinity War is yet another dream that I didn’t even dare to talk about publicly because I thought the odds of it were very slim,” Feige said. “So, no plans beyond that right now for any of the few remaining characters that aren’t already in the MCU, but I always say ‘never say never,’ who knows what can happen in the future?”




RELATED: There’s ‘No Weirdness’ Between Marvel and Fox, Feige Says
Arriving July 7, director Jon Watts’ Spider-Man: Homecoming stars Tom Holland, Michael Keaton, Zendaya, Donald Glover, Jacob Batalon, Laura Harrier, Tony Revolori, Tyne Daly, Bokeem Woodbine, Marisa Tomei and Robert Downey Jr.
TAGS: Kevin Feige, Marvel Cinematic Universe




source: CBR
 
Last edited:
I'm all for a great X-MEN film. And I don't see that in a Kinberg-helmed X-men. That's all I'll say about that.
 
relevant... oh if it's to your argument about mystique and her actress . it has nothing to do with that. so don't worry about it. it's about what keven fiege put last week which I put up in this thread prior as well. anything past that I don't care for now .

Buy you think it means something? you think something is secretly happening behind the scenes? otherwise its just stan lee saying he wished they all could be under marvel, which is not the first time he has said that if you really look around online.

Although it doesn't mean he is against fox's X-Men since he has already cameoed in various X-Men projects.
 
It's an X-men discussion board. And he's talking about X-men. Of course it's relevant.
 
Buy you think it means something? you think something is secretly happening behind the scenes? otherwise its just stan lee saying he wished they all could be under marvel, which is not the first time he has said that if you really look around online.

Although it doesn't mean he is against fox's X-Men since he has already cameoed in various X-Men projects.
lol stan does alot of thing's that conflict with his cameo's in the fox movies.

he even dissed sam remi's version the version that fail after that before it failed as well. when the new came about after that one mistakes as well.
which show you don't take his cameo as loyalty thing he will diss ya if he feel's like it if he doesn't aree with some thing in it.

Especily if he see a certain policy as uneeded and maybe stop turning into a unnessay fight. your not happy he said it, take up with him.
 
Last edited:
Its relevant cause its the typical xmen need to go back to marvel rhetoric.
 
Its relevant cause its the typical xmen need to go back to marvel rhetoric.

And it's never going to happen. And Fiege knows this. He even mentioned that just a few months ago.

Wash. Rinse. Repeat.
 
I could see a deal coming if things work out for Homecoming with Sony. Perhaps Marvel can reboot Wolverine now that he's out of the picture and get the rights to him whilst Fox continue with X-23 and Deadpool and their R rated movies which Disney wouldn't make. If they can have alternating Quicksilver's they should be okay with more alternative characters.
 
Originally Posted by JP
And it's never going to happen. And Fiege knows this. He even mentioned that just a few months ago.
Wash. Rinse. Repeat.

true ,but as he said recently he open to this below.
pots : #442

page :>> 18

this same thread


Comic Book Resources

1 hr ·

avengers-vs-x-men-marvel-studios-kevin-feige-header.jpg


Feige Open to an Avengers, X-Men Movie Crossover
3 hours agoMOVIE NEWS

The Marvel Studios boss said the big screen pairing is unlikely, but you never know what the future has in store.
Read more




avengers-vs-x-men-marvel-studios-kevin-feige-header.jpg





Marvel Studios head Kevin Feige might have ruled out any potential team up between Fox and Marvel, but that doesn’t necessarily mean he’s given up on the idea of the the X-Men or the Fantastic Four ever meeting the Avengers in the Marvel Cinematic Universe entirely.




In a recent interview with Jeremy Lasky, co-founder of Perception, the animation and deign studio responsible for most of the technology animation in Marvel Studios films, as well as the studio’s recent logo redesign, Feige broached the possibility that characters not already in the MCU could eventually find their way there in the future.




RELATED: Kevin Feige Teases A ‘New Age’ of The Marvel Cinematic Universe




“My goal is to replicate the experience that, you know, comic book fans have reading the books up on the screen and we’ve been able to accomplish that beyond my wildest dreams over the last ten years,” Feige said.




The Marvel boss went to discuss one of the most notable long shot acquisitions in the studio’s history: a certain Wall-Crawler who has made his way into two mainline Avengers movies.




“Spidey in Civil War and in the upcoming Infinity War is yet another dream that I didn’t even dare to talk about publicly because I thought the odds of it were very slim,” Feige said. “So, no plans beyond that right now for any of the few remaining characters that aren’t already in the MCU, but I always say ‘never say never,’ who knows what can happen in the future?”




RELATED: There’s ‘No Weirdness’ Between Marvel and Fox, Feige Says
Arriving July 7, director Jon Watts’ Spider-Man: Homecoming stars Tom Holland, Michael Keaton, Zendaya, Donald Glover, Jacob Batalon, Laura Harrier, Tony Revolori, Tyne Daly, Bokeem Woodbine, Marisa Tomei and Robert Downey Jr.
TAGS: Kevin Feige, Marvel Cinematic Universe
source: CBR
thing's are subject to change and they're the ones doing this.
 
Last edited:
And? Of course he's open. Why would he NOT be open? He knows it's not a possibility.
 
'And it's never going to happen. And Fiege knows this. He even mentioned that just a few months ago.

Wash. Rinse. Repeat'

He said it every few months but the fans still took that bait seriously.

Meanwhile 3 xmen movies are ready for production this year
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"