Project862006
Avenger
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2008
- Messages
- 21,197
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 31
Totally disagree with everything you wrote.
To suggest that Halle Berry is a bigger star than Jennifer Lawrence is patently ridiculous. Berry may have better name recognition at the moment but that's not what matters in Hollywood. Lawrence can instantly get a film greenlit by just attaching her name...Berry could maybe get a cheap direct-to-dvd film greenlit with her name alone. Lawrence is almost a lock for her second Oscar nom this year while I will put money on it that Berry is not.
And just to clarify, WB is pushing almost every single actor in Cloud Atlas. Also, if you follow these things, you'll know that WB does the same thing every year- pushes some movies in every single category (Harry Potter got the same treatment last year including pushes for something like 15 actors!). It's just a thing that studio does.
The reality is that Berry may have been a minor draw at some point, but there is no evidence that she is any more. Dark Tide went direct to VOD, Frankie and Alice remains unreleased, Perfect Stranger was a critical and financial failure, and Things We Lost in the Fire earned only $3.2 total from a wide release (and posted one of the top 100 worst per theater averages for a wide release EVER). When the bright spot on your filmography (since appearing in an inconsequential role in X3) is a small role in the financially disappointing New Year's Eve, you know you're in trouble!
Ok, my essay is over haha...
very terrible argument jen is the new it actress as she jsut came on the scene only acouple years ago she is only 21 for god sakes halle berry is what 46 and has been acting for well over 20 years rarely do actors hold their popularity that long
and dont worry halle does'nt need an oscar nomination since she already has the actual oscar

