It didn't take Game of Thrones six episodes to start getting good. It didn't take Mad Men, the Sopranos, Community, or any show I have spent years watching actually.
That's because on the drama front, cable shows are developed differently than broadcast shows due to longer development periods, larger investments for them, and wholly different (and more flexible) production timelines. Holding broadcast shows to the same standards as cable is...unfair. I understand only being able to stomach cable because when you're used to one brand of drama, then its hard to accept such a markedly different one, but regardless of individual tastes, SHIELD should be compared to other broadcast fare, not those cable shows you mentioned.
I personally have room in my viewing calendar for great cable AND broadcast shows.
Mad Men,
Breaking Bad (I haven't let it go yet),
Game of Thrones,
The Americans,
Orphan Black, Shameless, True Detective - all favorites of mine. But I can enjoy broadcast shows like
SHIELD,
Person of Interest and
Arrow as well...just on a different standard scale. They are basically my "popcorn" shows while the cable fare is the heavier, more substantive viewing. And
Hannibal is one broadcast exception that is, thanks to its unusual foreign production deal, able to reach the same heights of cable, imo. But being "popcorn" doesn't automatically make the broadcast fare "mediocre." Just like with movies, there's good popcorn entertainment, and bad popcorn entertainment. SHIELD, imo, started off as mediocre popcorn entertainment and became GOOD popcorn entertainment in the 2nd half of its season. Not comparable to
Mad Men or the
Sopranos, but then, it was never supposed to be.
For me, only watching the good cable/streaming stuff is the equivalent of having the only movies in my viewing diet be the heavy indie flicks and Oscar hopefuls. I need my lighter summer fare, too.
