Urich Leeds
Hype Drifter
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
- Messages
- 3,628
- Reaction score
- 13
- Points
- 58
I feel there's some validity to the comparisons with The Amazing Spider-Man 2. That's why I'm lowballing expectations and advise others to do the same. While the trailers have generally been good, there's a lot that could go wrong in the movie itself.
Particularly the fight itself seems to be most compelling part.
I don't. I hate the ASM2 (and SM3) comparison.
Those films didn't fail due to what they tried to put into them, and set up. It failed because of the minds behind it.
You had a incompetent studio head (Amy Pascal) enabling an equally incompetent and out of touch producer (Avi Arad). And that producer hired the writers/producers of one of the most reviled summer movie franchises (Orci/Kurtzman of TF infamy) to assist their inexperienced director, Marc Webb, who at the time was going into his 3rd film (his second being the predecessor to ASM2, and his first being an indie romance that couldn't be further removed from a big budget superhero flick). A director who had pretty much no power to say no to what Avi Arad suggested/wanted in the film. One of those things being the pointless airplane collision sequence.
In fact, go look up Kevin Feige's notes on ASM2. I can say with full confidence that much (if not all) of what he objects to in his notes came from Arad.
Pair that with an idiotic marketing strategy that they overspent on (some reports say over 250 million), and ASM2 was doomed for failure.
And if you read all the rumors about SM4, it was pretty much the same thing on SM3. Same dumb studio head, same dumb producer. The only difference is that Raimi walked instead having a villain forced on him again by Avi Arad, and letting the film suffer because of it.
And boy did SM3 suffer.
Last edited:

