I REALLY roll my eyes over typical, standard, always-the-same lines being used for ALL films:
Robert Workman ‏@TheDCD 3m
So, the verdict on Man of Steel...flawed, but still the best Superman movie in like 30 years. That's saying something.
This really says nothing. Just your typical, never-will-be-avoided, non-saying Bull-**** statement that doesn't make for anything clever. ALL movies have flaws! People talk about The Dark Knight being perfect. It wasn't perfect. But it was just about as close as it could get, for what it wanted to represent. But it wasn't "perfect". Hence, it had flaws. If a movie was not flawed in any ways, that would mean perfection, and it just doesn't exist. So pack the above statement away. It's useless. Let's move on.
Besides. Stating that MOS is the best superman film in 30 years could also be rewritten in to this: "MOS is the best superman movie since the first Donner film"... I'm sorry, but that won't be good enough. It had better be way better in everything it sorts out to do, than that of Superman 1. And no! That is in no way too much to ask. Otherwise, they might as well pack up and quit. It's that simple. MOS not only has to be way better than S1. It also needs to be one of the absolute best of all superhero films! I will accept nothing less with MOS than what was brought to the screen with Batman Begins. It has to be at least on par with that one - and it should go beyond that as well. Yup. I said that ****.