DA_Champion
Avenger
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2013
- Messages
- 12,106
- Reaction score
- 929
- Points
- 73
That's actually not true at all.
I think people are really misunderstanding the issue here.
Lois Lane is beautiful. By any normal people standards, she is a beautiful woman. But she exists in a world of Superman and Superman is not just handsome by "normal" standards---Superman is arguably supposed to be the most beautiful man in the world.
The way Lois is depicted in comics changes depending on the artist. Some artists, like Jim Lee and Ed Benes (who drew two of the pictures that are featured here), are notorious for exploiting pretty much every single female they draw. Jim Lee's art is gorgeous but he's never been my favorite artist for women for exactly this reason.
Most famous Superman artists like Dan Jurgens portray her as a beautful women, yes....but beautiful in the way that you might see in real life. Many times, she is drawn as less "obviously" beautiful or glamorous as other women like Lori Lemaris or even Lana Lang. Sometimes this was achieved through her clothing as she was often in very serious "work woman" clothing when the other women were presented with more obvious make-up. In the 1930's, she was supposed to be "sexy" because she was aggressive and strong but was not actually supposed to be supermodel beautiful. Joanne Carter herself was a really lovely woman but was lovely in a "real" way which did influence the character going forward.
When you compare the way she's often portrayed to say, Wonder Woman, the difference is clear.
Wonder Woman is supposed to be a nearly perfect physical specimen. (Using the narrow way in which Western culture defines beauty of course.) She is supposed to be the most beautiful woman in the world. Tall. Perfect huge breasts. Perfect long legs. Perfect long hair all the time. Perfect face. Perfect. She was created as literally the female version of Superman which is why they look like brother and sister. Wonder Woman was not created to be Superman's PARTNER. No. She was created to literally share the same role as Superman as a woman. That's why they look so much alike---it was a purposeful design. (Also why any romantic relationship between them, to me, always reads to incestuous. Bc that was the point.)
Lois' appearance has changed over the years and she has always been attractive. But you'll notice slight differences in the way she's drawn when you compare her to Wonder Woman. For example, if you read the famous "Day in the Life of Wonder Woman" issue by Phil Jiminez/Joe Kelly that features Lois and Diana...you'll see that Diana is drawn as slightly more striking, taller and with a larger chest than Lois. She's drawn as more idealized while Lois is drawn as more "normal" attractive.
The beauty dynamic with Superman and Lois Lane is reversed. You are used to seeing show after show and movie after movie where the woman is revered for her beauty. The Superman mythos is a twist on this because, for once, it's the MAN in question who is the "great beauty" and the woman who truly is valued more for her personality than for her great beauty. We aren't used to seeing this but this is one of the reasons why the Superman/Lois relationship is a reverse from the usual gender dynamics.
Consequently, many of the women who have played Lois Lane have been really beautiful. Who is the "most" beautiful is going to vary depending on what your personal tastes are but they are all beautiful. But they are all, imo, beautiful in an attainable way. As a woman, I can look at Teri Hatcher or Erica Durance or Amy Adams or Noel Neill as a young woman etc. and think, "I could be that person. I could be Lois Lane." And that's the point. Lois is an extraordinary, incredible idea about a "real" woman come to life. Idealized? Sure. But real.
Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster weren't in love with a movie star or a supermodel. They longed for a real woman that they KNEW. Subsequently, Clark Kent isn't supposed to lust over the supermodel or the most beautiful woman in the world. He's supposed to be in love with the woman who sits one desk over---beautiful but real. (I would suggest reading the amazing biolgraphy "Superboys" by Brad Ricca if you want more info. on this. Fascinating.)
Lois Lane is beautiful. She's sexy. She'e extremely attractive. But she's supposed to be the kind of beautiful that you might actually find in a normal office or on a city street. Striking? Yes. Beautiful? Yes. But not so completely unattainable that you can't imagine that you are her. Bc she's the extraordinary "mortal" who captures the heart of the most powerful and beautiful man in the world. She's a rare female character who isn't defined by her physical appearance and shouldn't be because it truly defeats the purpose of the character and why Clark loves her above all.
I agree it depends on the iteration. In both Lois and Clark and Smallville, Lois is better looking than Clark, not as much in the Donnerverse or in MoS. I also think Kate Bosworth was better looking than Routh, but I admit that I'm probably biased, I feel a sense of distaste when I think of Routh. In the animated series and recent DCAU features they both look like Greek gods except for the lack of curly hair.
Teri Hatcher was the most downloaded woman on the internet for six months and Erica Durance posed for maxim, I'm not sure to what extent the typical woman can look at them and think "I could be her". They're closer to Angelina Jolie than to Jennifer Aniston.
I don't think your WW example matters that much, it's from a WW comic, naturally WW will be the best looking character.
Thanks for the book recommendation though.
***********
Anyway, this is off-topic, somewhat. Amy Adams looks great, I merely meant to say a few posts back that the desaturated colour-palette undermines her appearance since it makes her look very pale, to which someone irrelevantly responded that it doesn't matter since Lois Lane isn't supposed to be a supermodel. Now that I think about it, the desaturated appearance might actually improve Cavill's appearance, so there's that.