Black Narcissus
8 | 24
- Joined
- May 2, 2012
- Messages
- 35,433
- Reaction score
- 14,251
- Points
- 103
Henry walks in....


I don't think the person was implying that there aren't perfectly healthy relationships where a man is 23 years older than a woman. Heck, I know several couples where the man is 20 years older and they are extremely happy. That's not gross at all.
What's "gross" is that it is a statistical fact that as men age in Hollywood their love interests stay the same age contributing to this terrible cultural problem. The data has been compiled on this and it was featured on several websites last year.
You can read the data here: http://www.vulture.com/2013/04/leading-men-age-but-their-love-interests-dont.html
It's not gross at all for two consenting adults who are 23 years apart to be in a relationship. But it is gross that this problem has become standard in Hollywood because it DOES have a severe impact on the way both men and women view age and gender.
Women like Amy Adams and Sandra Bullock are fighting this fight for us right now as they are sometimes being paired with age appropriate men or even younger actors. I actually saw someone talking about this openly on twitter last week---about how POSITIVE it is to have a mass franchise like SUPERMAN that is so huge in the media featuring an age appropriate actress with a slightly younger man. This is a HUGE deal and it's a huge first step. But it's just a crack in the glass. All we can do is hope that more and more franchises get called out on this stuff and start to correct this wrong.
But Amy cannot fight this fight alone. The culture absolutely has to change. And the only way we get to that change is if we can talk about this stuff and make people learn and understand that this is a serious problem and that is DOES impact our kids growing up to see this stuff.
I assume this is what the other poster meant and I assume you did know this. But I think this is where they were coming from?
To the extent that some political layer can be read into Lois Lane, it is that one can contrast her attitudes in the film to those of the authorities. Her approach is one of trust towards Clark Kent, which was well-earned given her investigation, as she says to him when they first met, she thinks he can't help himself but to help others. It's in direct contrast to the military's paranoia handing over Clark and investigating him with predator drones, etc, and ultimately her approach is more effective.
Well yeah, she treats Clark like a doormat. That's an aspect of her character that I'll miss.
That's how I felt too. The impression Amy's Lois gave me was that she was sweet and soft-spoken, as opposed to the feisty, sassy Lois I've always known. It's just her natural persona; its hard for her to not come across as sweet and gentle. Yes, she's a very talented actress, and her various nominations speak for themselves. But that doesn't mean she can be convincing playing every type of character (no actor/actress can). You put it quite well- a kitten that swears still appears cute. While an actress with a sweet, gentle personality can play a feisty, sassy character, it sure won't be as convincing as an actress who is herself feisty and sassy naturally.
But my opinion seem to be in the minority, as most people on this board seem to really like Amy's performance as Lois.
(and just a disclaimer, in case people think I'm an Amy hater. I think she's wonderful, just miscast in this particular role)
^ And thank God for that. I'm so over the ridiculously goofy & constantly walked over version of Clark Kent. If you're going to go that route I think there's a way to find good balance (TAS, Smallville, various comics, etc.).
I've always hated the idea of Lois constantly looking past Clark & only having eyes for Superman. I always liked the idea of Lois being in love with both personalities & then having the benefit of finding out they are the same man.
I wouldn't call it romance...it was definitely light romantic comedy and doesn't hold up well over time. I prefer supes on the big screen with a large budget or in animation as opposed to the small screen. I agree that the romance is a big part of it, but I like it mixed with other stuff. The fact that superman can offer something to almost every viewer is what makes it less than ideal to limit him to romantic comedy.
Personally, I think rather or not you like L&C or other earlier incarnations of Superman has more to do with age. It was a different age for some, so if you weren't there to view it in the time frame then it may seem corny or whatever. Lois and Clark was a very good show. It had some very funny moments and it did more to progress the relationship of Lois and Clark than any other show or medium about Superman. It also heavily influenced Smallville.
Within Lois and Clark, Lois has a crush on Superman, but she is in love with Clark Kent, by the middle of the first season.
I didn't get any "sweat" or "soft spoken" vibes from Lois in "Man of Steel". I got "caring" and "comforting" vibes, but that is different. I have to wonder if my reaction was different than some others because this was only the second place I had seen her perform (the first was in "The Office").
I wonder if other people fail to disassociate her from her other roles.
On the other hand, it might be because I really thought Kidder's Lois was too rude and willing to stomp on other people.
I've followed Amy's work and I got the same impression of Lois. I love what they did with her character. There are a couple Lois incarnations I find too harsh or aloof. I know she has tough city girl tendencies, can be annoyingly persistent or harsh at times, but I really believe she should have multiple facets that include a softer, caring side that comes out more around Clark. She shouldn't be some perpetually snarking "city chick" parody. I can see why she'd be tough a lot, especially as a woman in her field. She'd have to be tough and perhaps pushy to get ahead. I think she'd be more tough at work than anywhere else. Amy's Lois did display this. But I also like how she's more tender with Clark because frankly, he needed that. It allowed him to reveal more about his alien roots to her. I like the idea that they both show each other parts of themselves that others rarely see.
t:
Where is this stuff from, is it the special edition of the blu-ray or something? Cos I have the normal blu-ray which has some BTS the scenes stuff but there's a lot missing...
Can someone answer this question?
It is still the only live action incarnation where we get Lois and Clark past marriage and into living together as a married couple.
They even have a child show up at the very end, although I would change the last 5 minutes or so, so it wouldn't be so crazy, but that's just me.
I think the high point of the show is when Lois choses Clark over Superman, and that makes all their odd twists, turns and Lois not realizing when she should before that acceptable.
On the other hand, her figuring out from a touch is complicated by the fact she has kissed both Clark and Superman before that. In the first season she kisses Clark on screen 3 times (and may pull in a few off screen kisses while she is under the influence of a love potion, but that is debatable), and kisses Superman twice.
Dude multi quote.![]()
I would like more butt shots like that in the sequel.![]()
I just hope Lois has a larger role in the sequel and more overall screen time.
I do have to admit I would not mind if we get to see her dress up for an awards banquet, or some formal dinner where she and Clark are meeting Bruce Wayne, but what I want most of all is for her to be present and doing important things.
MOS gave us a slight taste of the type of journalist she is, but I would love to see more. I have to say on the whole it seemed a reasoned and good portrayal of her journalistic abilities.