If both costumes are black with lighting effects on them then why is one black and one is purple? Lighting is one thing, having a blatantly colored entire suit is another.
First, both are black but there may be a different light on Catwoman. Second, any coloring that may be certainly isn't blatant. Third, the lighting effect on Catwoman herself is inconsistent, the bodysuit appears purple, but the gloves and boots appear black as Batman's costume.
Doesn't that just prove that its purple then? How is the coloring not blatant? And if the suit is black why color the boots and gloves black and not the suit? The only thing I can think of is that the reflection off leather would look different, but then why the boots and gloves?
No it doesn't. If this were the Jim Balent or Tim Sale costume, I would agree with you, but, in most cases, the whole costume appears to be the same color, not with differently colored boots and gloves. This inconsistency with other appearances suggests it is an exercise of artistic license with lighting effects.
Regardless of what color it's supposed to be, I think this costume, and Catwoman in general, looks better in black.
Doctor Who said:I liked how Ra's scarf was a dark emerald green in BB.
I knew you'd love that gif. Your powers are useless now!
In most cases it appears almost black because she's usually in night-scenes, but in proper fully lit environments like that cover, its purple.
Then with his later work on All-Star its absolutely purple. and I like her better in black too, I was just stating I think Jim Lee's Catwoman is always a shade of purple.
This debate has taken a strange turn since it originated.
Thats not Jim Lee's Catwoman though, just because it looks similar does not make it the same exact suit. Each artist brings their own elements to characters. With Lee's work on Hush, during night scenes, it appears black, but in perfect lighting, its purple. The cover I posted, along with numerous other panels throughout Hush, I believe supports my argument. We keep going in circles![]()
But its drawn by Jim Lee so there are aesthetic differences.
There are lots of other instances in Hush in which the costume looks purple, not just on the cover, I don't have a scanner and cant find pages online but if you have it, please flip through it. I understand the use of highlighting, my point was if Batman has a black cape and cowl and is high-lighted with blues, why highlight Catwoman's black suit with purples?
Such differences are minutia of no consequence. It is meant to be the same costume.
![]()
Even if it isn't accurate to Jim Lee's Catwoman, it is damn near identical to Darwyn Cooke's Catwoman, so it definitely looks like Catwoman to me.
As an homage to Catwoman's purple costumes from the past. She isn't wearing purple.
No artist wants to continually draw the exact same design someone else created, they all put their own spin on characters. Just because its a similar design doesn't make it the exact same suit, Batman has had essentially the same look for decades, its generally only the colors and fabrics that change.
Half of her is covered up, aside from the leather its hard to tell what costume it is. Again, if not for the nails I would never guess that was Catwoman. The "whip" doesnt help at all.
Thats an assumption and an opinion.
I believe Jim Lee's Catwoman costume is black, with blue/purple highlighting...
And, Jim Lee designed this statue of Catwoman - he could have gone with purple but I would say she is most definitely wearing black
![]()
It's because the costume is black, not purple.