The Dark Knight Rises Anne Hathaway as Selina Kyle/Catwoman XXVIII

[elgato]

For anyone with eyes and taste.

For anyone that thinks a woman doesn't need to show her breast to look beautiful. And that by how far our society has reached, we should try to leave all its misogyny tendencies behind.

 

[DJ Kornphlake]

So a woman in a skintight latex suit is only misogynistic if she's showing cleavage in it?

 

[Dark Raven]

I think even if Anne Hathaway shows cleavage in TDKR, it's not going to look like that picture. That's just a typical comic book image where the woman's heaving boobs are huge and bursting out of the very tight suit. Anne's aren't anywhere as big as that and even in cleavage shots of hers, it never looks ridiculous, because they are of a normal size. So I don't think there would be any need to fear on that front.

 

[Majik1387]

It's a matter of presentation. That fan art shows just as much if not more cleavage than even her porn parody counterpart.

 

[Yurka]

So a woman in a skintight latex suit is only misogynistic if she's showing cleavage in it?

Heh.


On the cleavage topic, I seriously doubt we'll get anything. At the most we might get a slight unzip when she's toying with Batman.

 

[NateHevens]

For anyone that thinks a woman doesn't need to show her breast to look beautiful. And that by how far our society has reached, we should try to leave all its misogyny tendencies behind.

So a woman in a skintight latex suit is only misogynistic if she's showing cleavage in it?

It's the presentation. I see nothing wrong with Anne's Catsuit. Indeed, compared to convention, her Catsuit is almost prudish. But the art where she may as well be topless is a whole different ballgame. I would expect that presentation in a porn parody, and even the porn parody isn't being that generous.

I can't speak for Jezebel, but the feminists that I know both online and offline see nothing wrong with Anne's Catsuit, and I'd say that's a good thing.

I'm not sure why it's hard for some (NOT ACCUSING ANYONE HERE... that should be a given, though... this site is pretty good compared to some I've been on in the past [Reddit, for example]) to recognize that beauty does not have one definition (and even if it did, that definition certainly wouldn't hinge on how much cleavage is showing), but there you go.

 

[KalMart]

For anyone that thinks a woman doesn't need to show her breast to look beautiful. And that by how far our society has reached, we should try to leave all its misogyny tendencies behind.

She doesn't have to hide them to be respectable, either.

 

[lostzilla]

A cute cosplay:

 

[NateHevens]

She doesn't have to hide them to be respectable, either.

Of course. The drawing is over-the-top, however, and that's the point.

Anne can get naked and still be respectable (see: Love and Other Drugs), and we can love her for it (those scenes are the only parts of the movie I've seen... ). No one is saying otherwise (as far as I know).

 

[KalMart]

Of course. The drawing is over-the-top, however, and that's the point.

Anne can get naked and still be respectable (see: Love and Other Drugs), and we can love her for it (those scenes are the only parts of the movie I've seen... ). No one is saying otherwise (as far as I know).

Yeah..two of 'em, actually.

 

[jaymes_e06]

Yeah..two of 'em, actually.

Zing!

 

[Dark Raven]

Of course. The drawing is over-the-top, however, and that's the point.

Anne can get naked and still be respectable (see: Love and Other Drugs), and we can love her for it (those scenes are the only parts of the movie I've seen... ). No one is saying otherwise (as far as I know).

Yeah, I agree. Anne's bare boobs are more respectable than those oversized partially-covered boobs showing cleavage.

 

[kvz5]

Posted by Dragon_316ca (click pic for the bigger version):







Artist: http://jprart.deviantart.com/

 

[Blue Sugar]

Is that from the childrens books? The art looks very similar.

 

[craigdbfan]

Something's distracting there.

Anne's boobs aren't that big I'm pretty sure.

Sort kinda, yeah. Not all that far from what we have in the fan art. The anatomy is not all that off. It looks like the artist used this shot of her as reference:

Spoiler

That fan art with the exposed cleavage is a neat homage to the comics. I find it funny how some are calling it bordering on "porn" territory? Um have any of those people read Batman and/or Catwoman comic books? The human bodies for both males and females are heightened to their peaks. Men look incredibly muscular and women have insane amount of voluptuous curves. There's no harm in people liking a certain look. It's not as if anyone here said that everybody should look like this otherwise they're ugly. Being understanding of different beauties should also include bodies which some would deem as "ridiculous".

I agree though that type of exposed cleavage doesn't fit in a Nolan film as it would feel out of place and gratuitous but telling people they have bad taste or are blind for liking a certain body type in art or women for that matter is absurd.

 

[SingItWithMeNow]

Posted by Dragon_316ca (click pic for the bigger version):







Artist: http://jprart.deviantart.com/

Max schreck?!!?

 

[AnneFan]

Is that from the childrens books? The art looks very similar.

Yeah, the guy on Deviantart JPRart said they're pages he coloured from the books.

 

[Sharkboy]

Why is max schrek in TDKR?

 

[Dark Raven]

Sort kinda, yeah. Not all that far from what we have in the fan art. The anatomy is not all that off. It looks like the artist used this shot of her as reference:

Spoiler

That fan art with the exposed cleavage is a neat homage to the comics. I find it funny how some are calling it bordering on "porn" territory? Um have any of those people read Batman and/or Catwoman comic books? The human bodies for both males and females are heightened to their peaks. Men look incredibly muscular and women have insane amount of voluptuous curves. There's no harm in people liking a certain look. It's not as if anyone here said that everybody should look like this otherwise they're ugly. Being understanding of different beauties should also include bodies which some would deem as "ridiculous".

I agree though that type of exposed cleavage doesn't fit in a Nolan film as it would feel out of place and gratuitous but telling people they have bad taste or are blind for liking a certain body type in art or women for that matter is absurd.

For some reason Anne's cleavage looks better proportioned there in that pic than the comic art representation. Maybe the art makes the right boob look a bit skewed off to a slightly odd angle so that it looks like it's stuffed all in front just to make sure the artist gets it in the pic. I don't know.

Like I said, there is something distracting or slightly off about the pic. Almost in a Liefield way, but obviously nowhere as extreme. Maybe if the artist used Anne's proportions exactly as in that photo it would look more correct.

 

[Pfeiffer-Pfan]

The discussion always ends up back at boobs...

 

[Dark Raven]

The discussion always ends up back at boobs...

Well better than a discussion about lack of cowl or whip.

Lack of boobs/ ample boobs discussion FTW!!!

 

[elgato]

She doesn't have to hide them to be respectable, either.

Well that on the other hand... t:

 

[elgato]

Posted by Dragon_316ca (click pic for the bigger version):







Artist: http://jprart.deviantart.com/

I wonder if that computer scene in the cave is actually going to happen, there's nothing more iconic than Bruce checking a villain's profile in his computer.

 

[munchie64]

Well better than a discussion about lack of cowl or whip.

Lack of boobs/ ample boobs discussion FTW!!!

Can those be new teams?

 

[Great Mind(s)]

Where are people getting Max Schreck from?