Agentdemon
Sidekick
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2004
- Messages
- 2,053
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
You're right for the most part, but you're forgetting one important thing: that $400 investment wasn't WB's money. It belongs to the shareholders. It's their money. If WB makes a profit from a movie, that profit has to justify the investment from the shareholders. Rule of thumb is a minimum of 10% return on investment. And in that context BvS ain't doing well. Here, read this:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...-seen-earning-less-profit-than-superman-alone
Ahh ok thanks for the clarification.