Dan33977
Civilian
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2006
- Messages
- 881
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 11
FaT_tONle said:now edit your post before you get flamed
Um, no...
FaT_tONle said:now edit your post before you get flamed
Dan33977 said:Anyway, how is everyone tonight?
LastSunrise1981 said:(Casino Royale) are excellent films by the way.
This was one of the biggest surprise for me watching SR. Don't get me wrong, when he did have power usage, the action still 'sung' of Singer's style. It was always very smooth and appropriate, he understands that a character and their powers are one. But Why did I have to wait 25 minutes for the big stylized character entrance?? I guess with Superman being in space it made it difficult to give him the big opener right away, but I think it really took away from the movie to have the audience sitting there waiting for Supes to return for 30 minutes.X-Maniac said:I agree. Much though I did like X3 and can find a lot of good things in it, I agree. X1 and X2 had better openings, more edgy, they grabbed you straight away. X3's opening was nice, worked within the movie (as Xavier/Magneto return there later) but was a bit too gentle for me (though I loved how the gentler intro pieces then went into the Danger Room explosion).
This is perhaps Singer's style in providing solo moments for the characters. Storm lashing out at Toad, Deathstrike making mincemeat of Wolverine, Storm's tornado sequence, Magneto's prison break. It's a good way of giving them their moments within what is not an action-oriented movie. It's also more Singer's style because he doesn't often create teamwork battles, whereas X3 is more about multiple fighting and teamwork. However, what Singer did for the intro of SR is as gentle as X3's intro (a character-driven piece) and I didn't like SR's intro at all; it was most unlike Bryan not to provide something stronger than an old widow croaking on her deathbed and Lex hurling his wig at some squawking kid. Oh if we'd had that Krypton sequence - i could almost weep that it's not in the movie...
Nell2ThaIzzay said:I love Nightcrawler's introduction, but I don't even think it's the best action sequence in the movie, let alone the trilogy.
And, Nightcrawler's sequence is just one action sequence in X2, one of a very few in the movie. Singer didn't really have action in his movies, and that is why X-Men: The Last Stand had better action. Save for a couple in X2 (Nightcrawler's White House attack, and Magneto's prison break), I think the power usage is much better in X-Men: The Last Stand than in either of Singer's X-Men movies.
Seen said:I know that Singer wanted to extrapolate the Dark Phoenix Saga as the main plot of X3. He also wanted to include Emma Frost, which might've meant that the Hellfire Club would've provided a role. I don't think the cure would have played a part. It would've been Jean's resurrection, having amnesia, and then her slow turn as the Dark Phoenix.
I'm sure Nightcrawler would have returned, and we'd probably at least see either Gambit or Beast (or maybe Angel).
I'm still arguing about Mad Max 3 and it came 21 years ago. Is that pathetic?Dan33977 said:I cannot believe people are still arguing about this. It's pathetic.
BMM said:I don't. To me, Colossus' power usage in X2 is 10x more memorable than in The Last Stand. Likewise for Cyclops and Rogue. In the Last Stand, Cyclops blasts water . . . 'nuff said. Rogue is briefly shown absorbing Colossus' power for a split second, but she's so petrified she doesn't even know what's going on. I like her taking off her gloves and absorbing/wielding Pyro's power better. Speaking of Pyro, he burns cars again. I would have liked to have seen more creative manipulation as opposed to just blowing stuff up. The Iceman/Pyro showdown was cool, although watching TV between the months of March and May almost ruined it for me, as most of it was spoiled by the onslaught of television adverts. That being said, I'll give The Last Stand Iceman.
I still find Storm's climatic moment in X-Men (wind, lightning, and electricity surging from her body and all around her) and the dogfight sequence in X2 to be better than anything she does in The Last Stand. At least there was some variability in her powers in the first two films, whereas in the latest installment, it's the same old thing. She twirls with the best of them though. Professor X shows more power variability in the first two films whether it be through Cerebro or out in public, and I think it's cooler. Ditto for Mystique. The same goes for Nightcrawler and some of the students like Siryn. Magneto's bridge sequence is fun even if believed unnecessary. I'll have to wait a few years to see how it holds up against his escape sequence in X2 though. I still don't find anything in The Last Stand to be as clever as his turning the guns on the police in X-Men or detonating the soldiers grenades in X2.
Jean Grey easily provides the coolest sequences in The Last Stand but they lose serious points after waiting for three years and seeing no recognizable signs of a Phoenix display. That was a major let down for me, but the Jean/Xavier sequence was great (it made the movie worth my time . . . without it, I don't know where I would rate The Last Stand). Kitty's cameo in X2 is great, but The Last Stand takes this one. Then there's Wolverine . . . He just seems cooler to me in the first two movies. A lot of his scenes just felt like they had been done before like when he tracks down Jean but is levitated and overcome by Magneto (incredibly similar to his setup with Rogue in X-Men six years ago).
Callisto, Juggernaut, and Quills don't do it for me. I've seen the beat 'em up bad guys before in X-Men and X2. I cant really say much for Angel . . . he flies to get around . . . but he doesn't really do much. Beast punches and his wirework leaves something to be desired. With the money The Last Stand had, I think it could have been much more creative. I would have liked if it had paid more attention to the characters already present rather than spending money on things like unnecessary CGI Toad look-a-likes.
Dan33977 said:I cannot believe people are still arguing about this. It's pathetic.
Rac said:I'm still arguing about Mad Max 3 and it came 21 years ago. Is that pathetic?
ScarletPhoenix said:A lot of people are confused with Phoenix's relationship with the brotherhood/Magneto. Magneto did not attempt to "recruit" Jean into his army. He tried to persuade her to fight alongside him. There is a difference. She is the ultimate trump card but Magneto cannot play the card, Phoenix has to play it. Phoenix will choose what it does, plain and simple. Magneto put a lot of effort into gaining Phoenix's "support" not so he could use her against the humans but so that she would use herself against the humans. Magneto never commands Phoenix throughout the movie. Also, when he said "In chess the pawns go first" he also explained why he didn't pressure even pressure phoenix to engage, she was the ultimate force on that battlefield, let her make her move when she feels it necessary. Ordering the Phoenix around is a good way to get yourself vaporized.
Next, people need to stop acting like the Phoenix and Jean are two different entities. They are the same. I sort of think of Jean as the physical incarnation of the (and with full access to) phoenx force in the human body of a level 5 mutant. Jean Grey, Phoenix Force, and Phoenix imo have a "Holy Trinity" relationship within the MU.
BMM said:I don't. To me, Colossus' power usage in X2 is 10x more memorable than in The Last Stand. Likewise for Cyclops and Rogue. In the Last Stand, Cyclops blasts water . . . 'nuff said. Rogue is briefly shown absorbing Colossus' power for a split second, but she's so petrified she doesn't even know what's going on. I like her taking off her gloves and absorbing/wielding Pyro's power better. Speaking of Pyro, he burns cars again. I would have liked to have seen more creative manipulation as opposed to just blowing stuff up. The Iceman/Pyro showdown was cool, although watching TV between the months of March and May almost ruined it for me, as most of it was spoiled by the onslaught of television adverts. That being said, I'll give The Last Stand Iceman.
I still find Storm's climatic moment in X-Men (wind, lightning, and electricity surging from her body and all around her) and the dogfight sequence in X2 to be better than anything she does in The Last Stand. At least there was some variability in her powers in the first two films, whereas in the latest installment, it's the same old thing. She twirls with the best of them though. Professor X shows more power variability in the first two films whether it be through Cerebro or out in public, and I think it's cooler. Ditto for Mystique. The same goes for Nightcrawler and some of the students like Siryn. Magneto's bridge sequence is fun even if believed unnecessary. I'll have to wait a few years to see how it holds up against his escape sequence in X2 though. I still don't find anything in The Last Stand to be as clever as his turning the guns on the police in X-Men or detonating the soldiers grenades in X2.
Jean Grey easily provides the coolest sequences in The Last Stand but they lose serious points after waiting for three years and seeing no recognizable signs of a Phoenix display. That was a major let down for me, but the Jean/Xavier sequence was great (it made the movie worth my time . . . without it, I don't know where I would rate The Last Stand). Kitty's cameo in X2 is great, but The Last Stand takes this one. Then there's Wolverine . . . He just seems cooler to me in the first two movies. A lot of his scenes just felt like they had been done before like when he tracks down Jean but is levitated and overcome by Magneto (incredibly similar to his setup with Rogue in X-Men six years ago).
Callisto, Juggernaut, and Quills don't do it for me. I've seen the beat 'em up bad guys before in X-Men and X2. I cant really say much for Angel . . . he flies to get around . . . but he doesn't really do much. Beast punches and his wirework leaves something to be desired. With the money The Last Stand had, I think it could have been much more creative. I would have liked if it had paid more attention to the characters already present rather than spending money on things like unnecessary CGI Toad look-a-likes.
From a comic stand point the lack of action sucks, from a movie DRAMA standpoint, Singer's use of action to stimulate the story almost comes off like true artistic genius.Nell2ThaIzzay said:I love Nightcrawler's introduction, but I don't even think it's the best action sequence in the movie, let alone the trilogy.
And, Nightcrawler's sequence is just one action sequence in X2, one of a very few in the movie. Singer didn't really have action in his movies, and that is why X-Men: The Last Stand had better action. Save for a couple in X2 (Nightcrawler's White House attack, and Magneto's prison break), I think the power usage is much better in X-Men: The Last Stand than in either of Singer's X-Men movies.
I agree with most of this. The fact that they tried to breathe a story into their adaptation of Phoenix was laudible but still sucks. However, it could've been so much more horrible had they not used Chuck/Magneto. That scene alone really stands out, but it saddens me because it reminds me of how much more brilliant the whole movie should be.BMM said:Jean Grey easily provides the coolest sequences in The Last Stand but they lose serious points after waiting for three years and seeing no recognizable signs of a Phoenix display. That was a major let down for me, but the Jean/Xavier sequence was great (it made the movie worth my time . . . without it, I don't know where I would rate The Last Stand). Kitty's cameo in X2 is great, but The Last Stand takes this one. Then there's Wolverine . . . He just seems cooler to me in the first two movies. A lot of his scenes just felt like they had been done before like when he tracks down Jean but is levitated and overcome by Magneto (incredibly similar to his setup with Rogue in X-Men six years ago).
Again, I can agree, Beast was fun to watch and I just WON'T complain harshly about wire work. Unless I can literally see the wires it's just not one of my pet peeves.Nell2thaIzzay said:I refuse to complain about Beast's X-Men: The Last Stand wirework when the Lady Deathstrike vs. Wolverine battle is one of the lamest wirework / choreographed fights I've seen in a to-be-taken-seriously movie. The flips all the way up to the ceiling, and the pushes that send each other flying all the way across the room... it's just way too soft and Power Rangers for a movie that is otherwise much darker and more serious. The wirework is a lot more seamless in X-Men: The Last Stand.
Woah... now you know that's just not a fair comparison. Angel was actually being used in the plot, he was way more than a 5 second cameo like kitty's X2. A better comparison would be X3 Angel to X2 nightcrawler, and I'm pretty sure we know to whom that would go. BMM's criticism of Angel's uselessness is fairly accurate. Introducing and using a character for your plot and then essentially forgetting about him is a....:You talk about Angel just flying to get around, in X2 Kitty just ran through some walls... :
At least X-Men: The Last Stand had the big badass Juggernaut crashing through some walls behind her.
Cosmic Mind said:me too, but is up to him to do it.....