This is where you lose. You're filling in the blanks with whatever you'd like based on nothing in the film.
With all due respect, this always happens when you present your evidence that isn't as demonstrable as you claim, right on cue too. You said you had it, you cited video evidence I all but pointed you to and it didn't say what you needed it to say so naturally it's me. That 'card' always be played when your facts are scrutinized, examined or explained.
You said:
"Nothing in the movie implies as much. It actually presents the opposite, in fact. Unlike you, I'm going to draw my conclusion from what was presented in the film." Then you trumpeted our your evidence. This so called fact then turned out not to be warnings of danger, but warnings of forbiddings, laws decrees of desecration from a long dead body of authority, one that made a habit of doing so when it came to genetic modification. And you claim this was warning of danger as "fact". Your evidence almost never says what you need, certainly not as fact, even when you tried with numbers. Then you cry pedantry or the like when the idea that it's not a fact but arguable as presented. And yes tiresome for all of us.
Speaking of goal posts, nothing has been moved for the discussion was always that of if 'moronic stupidity, level of thought', Dude called lex a moron(like 20 times now, because he made something dangerous without thinking of how to either control or survive it, resulting in a bad villain scheme, one of the 'worst ever' when looking it through the eyes of straight forward convention. I said for one, there were planed controls, so much as to say luthor stood confidently in front of the monster which asserts there was a thought of immunity(suspiciously ignored here), there was a celestial info dump and there was a blood ritual all pointing to this same conclusion. I asserted if one needs to point the finger at level of intelligence then why not ALSO(also) point it at a super genius making an exponentially advanced alien A.I. and not at the very least closing off it's circuit to any network(seems like a standard fail safe if I've ever seen one, one that solves just about every problem). People keep hiding behind stark assumed he was making a benevolent thing so it's not a mental strike against him if didn't occur to him to plan if something went wrong. Fine let's play that game, that doesn't make him as dumb as you assert luthor supposedly is, that makes him what exactly? Given how smart he's been written at this stuff and given the potential for destruction he himself determined in seconds once faced with the prospect that his A.I. wasn't a nice guy but simply a guy. That makes him what? I say it makes him as 'dumb' and ego driven as his peers said he was. If he could do it again, I'm sure he would do it in a 'smarter' fashion. Or maybe he'd do it the exact same way, given how intellectually sound that method supposedly was. Given he jumped right into the next opportunity to play with unsafe world ending A.I. danger in that same movie I can't say. Not recognizing the danger with which you tamper with is a measure of intelligence. If you are playing with a nova bomb level nuke, if you don't understand what it's capable off because you are focused on the path of clean energy 'scientific discovery' you aren't doing things in a 'smart' fashion. The whole point was measuring if intelligence was either good or bad. If you guys want to argue it's absent in one arguable scenario I only question how much of it is there in the other, especially when dealing with 'really smart guys'.
And yes you have asserted numerous times that we were pointed to the birth of a' hateful devil, deformity'. However I pointed to the fact that his is only stated in language. Quasimoto the hunchback could be cited as the same in language. My point as it's always been was that none of this was in the direction of Luthor. Luthor could be said to have been making just that, which is why I said all those 'warnings' you supposedly saw could have been of a Proteus like simpleton that would have been a deformed monster by definition/appearance but his own monster, family, blood of his blood... Maybe if you had footage of warnings that Luthor wouldn't be able to control the monster, that he was in danger your point would subvert this point that subverts yours, you don't.
You keep pointing to this 'sole purpose of killing and destruction' stuff. You go ahead point me to the part of the film that states this 'fact' plainly so we can put this to bed. Better yet I'll do it for you. The one place any such thing is said of doomsday singular purpose is from the mouth of it's own creator, Luthor. And that purpose is: "blood of MY blood! Born to destroy YOU! YOUR Doomsday". That's all. This is luthor's plan and the only place you you hear about doomsdays purpose and ambitions before the fact are from luthors own will, a singular purpose in birth to kill superman as was his cited 'plan' going in.
Let's try this a simpler way. You:
"At 1:14, the ships AI tells him, "the Kryptonian archive contains knowledge from over 100,000 different worlds". Lex responds, "good. Teach me"." The very next thing we see is Luthor pouring his own blood on the creature and people like you hollering that you don't know why he's pouring blood on it. Gee, could the reason maybe possibly have been divulged to the character during that portion of the film where he was, gee I don't know "TAUGHT STUFF", stuff we weren't.
I mean seriously that this keep coming up is pretty gnarly. For character beliefs to make sense, the character themselves need to be made privy to information, not the audience.
This now reminding me of when Kevin Spacey was 'TAUGHT STUFF' in superman returns about about crystals, and the next thing we all knew he was making giant things out of crystals based on procedures and internal logic to the film. There were no people on forums going "Wait how is lex going to stop that landmass from growing, in real life when I make make sugar krystals I can stop them from growing by removing them from their source of material, this movie didn't show me how luthor plans to stop that thing from increasing." No all it did was show you Luthor was 'TAUGHT STUFF' and that was that. But now plans and procedures need to be thoroughly thought to the audience along with main character. The worst is people here talking about what such blood rituals yield in our world, in their own experience. Because these people know all the parameters of alien resurrection machines on cross bred animal systems in a sci fi fiction. Next it will be people talking about why spiders that have been in microwave ovens won't give you powers with a bite, such the wrong way to go about it.
good riddance. I have netflix to watch.
