Did you read the reviews? The one that compares it to GoT and LotR points out it lacks the drama of LotR and the audacity of GoT. Basically, it is boring to him. That is the comparison. Jesus, read.
That is the spirit.
So misrepresent him? Good. Thank you for showing you have no idea what you are talking about, just want to cry out of context. Clearly you are not to be taken seriously.
That is of course not what he said, but apparently your reading skills aren't exactly the best.
If you expect a movie to do poorly in reviews, it isn't not because you think it is going to be good. Watching a movie with a poor RT rating and liking it, is different then going in thinking it will do poorly.
Still it's apples and oranges. Film can still be good and successful, but just not appealing to everyone for various reasons. There's a masterpiece film called "Leon", but RT suggests it's a quite average film. And it was absolutely ignored by Oscars. Same as Possession (1981), that features probably one of the most mind-blowing female performances I've ever seen in movies (though the director was nominated at Cannes).
There is a difference between disagreeing with critics or consensus, and suggesting that because a film is a certain type of film, it has no chance of being praised. Also, comparing quality arthouse to something like Mortal Kombat of course misses the point by a lot. Namely that Mortal Kombat was a fun for kids/teens, but poorly made movie overall.
Ah, thank you. Campea the "lead"?
