KRYPTON INC.
Incorporated Kryptonian
- Joined
- May 23, 2013
- Messages
- 85,990
- Reaction score
- 41,579
- Points
- 103
As shown by the art you posted, African looking WW and Supes is nothing new in the DCU.
I don't even know how Blade got made before BP and I loved the Blade movies(at least the first two, the third sucked). I hate the comic character but which is my point. Blade is a D list hero who helped launch the whole comic book movie craze. While the first black superhero is still gathering dust on the shelf waiting for his opportunity.
I think most people will be fine with a black superman aslong as the word alternate universe appears somewhere in the synopsis.
For those keeping their eyes open, there was a welcome return in last week’s Superman #683 comic book (featuring 100,000 Kryptonians like Superman coming to earth) — non-white Kryptonians were clearly shown.
There had been some “squint and you can see them” individuals in group shots earlier in the storyline, but the Sergio Leone-style “showdown” page showed the Kryptonian-equivalent of Africans and Asians. (Preview of Superman #683 here.)
Big deal?
Well, kind of. By and large, superheroes are still the domain of the idealized white man (and woman). For the character's first 30 years, Superman’s homeworld of Krypton was all-white. It was only in 1971 —33 years after Superman's debut in 1938 — that the first non-white Kryptonian was seen. A few months later, the idea of non-white Kryptonians was expanded upon.
“In issue #239, a two-page map showed that Kryptonians of color had an island all to themselves, which is pretty embarrassing,” says Mark Waid, Boom! Studios Editor-in-Chief, occasional DC Comics writer, and pretty much expert in all things Superman.
“I cringe to tell you this, but the Kryptonians of Color were all on ‘Vathlo Island, Home of a Highly Advanced Black Race.’ It wasn't until the mid-70s, when more ‘World of Krypton’ back-up stories ran more regularly, that we really saw any ethnicity whatsoever on the planet.”
While he’s not sure of how exactly Krypton's population diversified, Waid figures that it had to do with E. Nelson Bridwell, the assistant on the Superman books at the time. “He took a special interest in ‘caretaking’ the history and fictional culture of Krypton,” Waid says. “More than anyone else who ever lived, Nelson knew that world.”
Much like other mono-cultural planets of the Golden Age of science fiction, Krypton was a product of its time.
“A lack of ethnicity was an eror of omission, and I'm not sure given the time that it's fair to call that ‘racist,’” Waid says.
Superman creators Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster, and all those who followed in crafting the Superman legend were, indeed, simply following the traditions of the Golden Age of Science Fiction, when one world always equaled one culture, maybe two if they were at war because the plot demanded it.
9 comic book characters to watch
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/28439114/ns/technology_and_science-games/t/comic-book-characters-watch/
Remember, as absurd as this sounds in an America finally enlightened enough to elect a black man as President, the Civil Rights Act wasn't passed until 1964. The gradual recognition of all races and ethnicities across all of pop culture, comics included, really didn't start to blossom until the late 1960s.
Yes, Superman was weirdly late to that party — the first African-American even in a Superman story, and it's from the summer of 1970. But again, and not to make excuses, that delay was just creative inertia in action.
After the start of a diverse Krypton in the early ‘70s, it was left up to creators and editors to make sure that Krypton was racially diverse, and it was occasionally shown to be — if the story allowed. Throughout its rather ignoble history, Vathlo Island remained undeveloped and unexplored by writers, which is both good and bad, probably. One interesting idea that was floated in the very brief mention of Vathlo in Krypton's history was that there was no slave trade on Krypton, which is why races didn't really mix — or at least why some of Jor-El's best friends weren't black.
More often than not though, the planet of Superman’s birth has been shown to be made up of just one race, even in crowd scenes. As a quick aside, "Smallville," an alternate retelling of Clark Kent's younger years on The WB/CW has shown Nam-Ek, a Kryptonian equivalent of African-American.
But with “New Krypton,” story architects Geoff Johns, James Robinson and Sterling Gates have been working to merge all aspects of Krypton that have been shown over the years, making all the visions and versions into a workable whole — including the fact that the planet was racially diverse — and hopefully without the segregation of Vathlo Island. Here's hoping for a more colorful Krypton.
I am sure Blade was a cheaper property to option and produce - in a time when Marvel was box office poison - that's how it got made before BP.
So umm...what happened to T'Challa?
And I don't think Marvel's reluctance to do BP has anything to do with race.
I thought this was the Black Panther thread, whats with all this black superman business?
Wesley Snipes had the pick of making a Blade or Black Panther movie in the 90's and he choose Blade.I don't even know how Blade got made before BP and I loved the Blade movies(at least the first two, the third sucked). I hate the comic character but which is my point. Blade is a D list hero who helped launch the whole comic book movie craze. While the first black superhero is still gathering dust on the shelf waiting for his opportunity.
Steve McQueen isn't interested. McQueen says he only wants to make movies about real life stuff.Of course you do realize that Black Panther is NOT an Af-Am character - so why would you insist on an Af-Am director?
I think Marvel will tap Steve McQueen for the job...
I like CAGE. Really. But... I'd rather that the first black superhero to see a big budget treatment be BP. Sorry, but BP tell kids to imagine being genius Kings. Luke gives cover to the idea that prison is just another right of passage to black male youth. Something about that's been more and more unsettling to me as I've grown older.

That's marvel.
It's suppose to be grounded right?AND DEALING more with real world problems and DC less so,of course over years both have inspired each other,so DC has become abit more like marvel and marvel ABIT more like DC.
So really there is not much difference anymore,it's still there but less so.
Look on the bright side,luke cage is going to BE shown for the first time in live action.
I think the tv show will do him more justice overall in the end.
More detailed stories for all superheroes could be told better on tv by the way.
Movies are just for the less hardcore and more for the causal audience,you know folks who could really care less about superheroes.They just want a good enough story and action.
If a black panther story makes it to a live action movie fine,but in the end a tv series or short one is better overall.
You could tell more of the story.
Anyway it's going to be the most famous superheroes most of time to make to a live action movie.
That' my point.That´s why directors don´t give a damn about what comic book readers want.
A little bit of thisI like CAGE. Really. But... I'd rather that the first black superhero to see a big budget treatment be BP. Sorry, but BP tell kids to imagine being genius Kings. Luke gives cover to the idea that prison is just another right of passage to black male youth. Something about that's been more and more unsettling to me as I've grown older.
Only if they work out Zoe Saldana's schedule. She's shooting the next three Avatar movies all in a row, and who knows how long those three films will take.
I hear that GOTG2 could also feature the Hulk.
You'll forgive me, but your finer points are mostly ignored. The fact is, no matter the specifics, most look on Cage as the black super hero that went to prison, and it's something highlighted about him as a character. I am not saying that Luke isn't any of the things you say. But, he too easily plays into certain stereotypes.
People projecting their racial prejudices onto a character is their issue not the fault of the characters which is my point.
There are numerous superheroes in the comics who do terrible things but aren't as harshly judged upon. I'm not interested in validating peoples racist views and I don't think we as black people should encourage it either by supporting those views.
When you have characters like Wonder Man who embezzles money, Hawkeye is a reluctant crook, Black Widow a violent murderer, Ant-Man a burglar and Iron Man a manipulative lying womaniser dumping on the one guy who just so happens to be black because he got sent to prison after having heroin planted in his apartment is a ridiculous double standard.
But Marvel's pattern so far per year (1 cosmic, 1 Earth-based) makes me think 2017 will be Thor 3 and then Black Panther. Just makes sense to me.The Cap 3 writers hinted at 1950's Cap, but I think the Russos will make the ultimate decision on that. There's an update on that:
http://www.craveonline.com/film/int...a-the-winter-soldier-video-spoiler-interviews
I think Carol Danvers fills the untitled 2017 Slot after Thor 3. Her story is cosmic and fits more the Avengers 3 storyline than T'Challa.