TheCorpulent1
SHAZAM!
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2001
- Messages
- 154,474
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
He seems to be a relatively meticulous artist. Look at the way he draws hair, for example. His Thor run was very pretty.
Darthphere said:Theres a funny thing called an opinion, and we live in 2006, nto 1970, his art TODAY sucks.
photojones2 said:he had a mother effing stroke! his stuff might not as good as it was back in the day, but that's because he's had to LEARN TO DRAW WITH HIS LEFT HAND.
i liked byrne's stuff a LOT better 30 years ago. that doesn't make him any less legendary.
my god. show some respect.
Darthphere said:Im more offended by the fact that theyre bringing Darfur into the comics than Gulacy being called a legend.
Darthphere said:Actually I dont. And I dont believe he did.
Darthphere said:I dont think hes that influential. Steranko, Adams, Kirby, Windsor Smith, Joe Kubert, those are legends in my books, Gulacy is not.
TheCorpulent1 said:I hadn't even heard of Gulacy before that JSAC arc, and I'm pretty well-informed about mainstream comic artists. Sucks that he had a stroke and I'm sorry for the guy, but that doesn't make his current art any better.
photojones2 said:opinions are opinions, but that's kind of a dumb one.
one can definitely tell who's a real reader of comics, and who's just a reader of the last 10 or so years, with statements like that. i bet you don't even own anything by kirby or kubert. you've just seen some things online and read what other's had to say those guys.
I've looked up some of his earlier work, and he was pretty good. But he's still really bad now. Sorry I don't worship at his altar because of his earlier stuff.photojones2 said:like i said, art is subjective. you don't have to like it.
it's your ignorance that bothers me.
GNR4Life said:I wonder what's so crucial that Cap #25 can't come out until CW #7 is out.Sure Cap is the main guy and all,but there has to be more too it.
TheCorpulent1 said:You'll have to go to photojones for all your comics now. Apparently all you've read so far are fake comics.
TheCorpulent1 said:You'll have to go to photojones for all your comics now. Apparently all you've read so far are fake comics.
I've looked up some of his earlier work, and he was pretty good. But he's still really bad now. Sorry I don't worship at his altar because of his earlier stuff.
TheCorpulent1 said:Jesus, Paul Gulacy's a comic book legend? Does that mean, like, legendarily bad?
Darthphere said:Photojones is the only poster on here that loves comics, let the mass suicide begin. And I thought I was on a high horse.
photojones2 said:you're a moron.
but seriously, how can you claim to like old-school guys like kirby with out owning their work. you can't look through the interiors and see what a good storyteller he was. all you see is the avengers #1 cover google.images.com. so don't pretend to know comics if you don't.
No, that's ignorant. You were right when you called me ignorant, but you're wrong now that you've switched to petty personal attacks.photojones2 said:you don't have to like it. i don't like neal adams. i just don't. but at least i respect the guy for what he's done for comics.
you have this ignorance about your posts. example:
now, you've just said, you never heard of him before some work he did for dc. that's ******ed. someone who loves comics (i think), would go, "oh, paul gulacy...yeah, dude pretty much invented kung-fu comics...hmm..." instead, you make these asinine comments about how bad he is without even knowing who he is, or his body of work.
that's DUMB.