Game of Thrones - Book Readers' Thread - - - - - - - Part 24

Status
Not open for further replies.
The original Targs forced Winterfell to surrender to them, so it obviously has been done before. I don't know how easy it was, but they did it.
The North surrender without a fight and did so in what I believe was not winter, let alone this winter. Do people think Jon is just going to give up the North, when he knows what is coming from the other side of the Wall?

Also the North will theoretically be held by a Targaryen.
 
The North surrender without a fight and did so in what I believe was not winter, let alone this winter. Do people think Jon is just going to give up the North, when he knows what is coming from the other side of the Wall?

Also the North will theoretically be held by a Targaryen.

Also recall Aegon's conquest; he and his sister wives couldn't take Storm's End using dragons because the constant rainfall and winds made it difficult for them to fly and breathe fire. I'd have to imagine it would be even worse during a blizzard.
 
Also recall Aegon's conquest; he and his sister wives couldn't take Storm's End using dragons because the constant rainfall and winds made it difficult for them to fly and breathe fire. I'd have to imagine it would be even worse during a blizzard.
I feel like I should have remembered this. :funny:

Any way we slice this, my money is on the Starks. Jon is the warrior leader who will "control" the North, Sansa will have Littlefinger's skill set and thus potential might control the Vale, Arya is completing her assassin training and will have an army of wolves, and Bran has knowledge and the ability to see through the eyes of others. So no surprising them.
 
The North surrender without a fight and did so in what I believe was not winter, let alone this winter. Do people think Jon is just going to give up the North, when he knows what is coming from the other side of the Wall?

Also the North will theoretically be held by a Targaryen.


Who said anything about giving it up? Dany has made it clear she will leave a head in each of the territories. She only needs their fealty.

If she goes the Queen route then the territories will be headed by governers. If she names herself Empress then each territory will be a vassal kingdom with its own King or queen. Either way Jon would get to keep the North but he would swear fealty to Dany and the throne.

The only reason she would need to use force is if he refuses to give fealty in which case she'd have to force him through force.
 
Who said anything about giving it up? Dany has made it clear she will leave a head in each of the territories. She only needs their fealty.

If she goes the Queen route then the territories will be headed by governers. If she names herself Empress then each territory will be a vassal kingdom with its own King or queen. Either way Jon would get to keep the North but he would swear fealty to Dany and the throne.

The only reason she would need to use force is if he refuses to give fealty in which case she'd have to force him through force.
Why would the North swear fealty to her, especially considering Dany is actually not the heir, Jon is? More importantly, you seem to think Dany wins easily. I don't think she wins at all if they fight. I think the North is probably done be ruled by those that have no grasp of it.

And we could always go back to the original prophecy about Dany. Namely who her third husband was suppose to be. The blue rose in the Wall of ice.
 
Why would the North swear fealty to her, especially considering Dany is actually not the heir, Jon is? More importantly, you seem to think Dany wins easily. I don't think she wins at all if they fight.

And we could always go back to the original prophecy about Dany. Namely who her third husband was suppose to be. The blue rose in the Wall of ice.

You seem to think the North is going to act like a bunch of rebels just because they are the North. The North swore fealty to the Iron Throne for generations, and were left alone, and did just fine. There is no reason to think Jon and the North wouldnt do the same again.

And no I dont think she wins easily, because I dont think Jon's going to put up a fight for independence. He doesnt need to if Dany treats the North like she intends to treat the Iron Islands.

And if Jon takes the throne then the North would have to swear fealty to him just like the rest of Westeros so it still wouldn't be independent.

Them marrying really doesnt make any difference.
 
You seem to think the North is going to act like a bunch of rebels just because they are the North. The North swore fealty to the Iron Throne for generations, and were left alone, and did just fine. There is no reason to think Jon and the North wouldnt do the same again.

And no I dont think she wins easily, because I dont think Jon's going to put up a fight for independence. He doesnt need to if Dany treats the North like she intends to treat the Iron Islands.

And if Jon takes the throne then the North would have to swear fealty to him just like the rest of Westeros so it still wouldn't be independent.

Them marrying really doesnt make any difference.
The North swearing fealty to a Northern is different. The King in the North thing came from the fact that the North was sick of this crap. Also the North wouldn't be the rebels here, Dany would be.

And marriage does change everything.
 
The North swearing fealty to a Northern is different. The King in the North thing came from the fact that the North was sick of this crap. Also the North wouldn't be the rebels here, Dany would be.

And marriage does change everything.

The King in the North thing happened because Joffrey a Lannister killed the Warden of the North. It was a gross violation of the relationship and the terms the crown is supposed to have with the North. They never would have rebelled if that hadnt happened. And Dany had nothing to do with that.

If Dany gives Jon the same terms she gave Yara I think Jon would agree to those terms. He isnt some rebel to the core that will only accept independence and to hell with anything less. He isnt going to start a war the North cant afford with Dany and her allies when the alternative is a stable united kingdom with a kingdom's worth of resources and allies.

As long as the North gets to operate like they used to, and the North gets to have its own leader like Yara will be for the Iron Islands their best bet is to reunite with the crown under Dany.
 
Last edited:
The naming of Robb (or Ned) as King in the North was only a matter of time... Before Ned died. IMO... They were already in open rebellion. If they saved Ned, they'd have wanted him as King too. Whether he'd accept it or not is a different issue.
 
The Thrones threads have died. I guess the Brexit thing killed it :o
 
It's not going to affect filming and stuff is it?
 
It won't. HBO/Time Warner has enough pull to make it work regardless of what happens. Not worried on that front.
 
Purchased the soundtrack there yesterday and just finished it....bloody brilliant.

The Winds of Winter has a Mhysa vibe so I assume we're getting a Dany scene as the final one. Outside chance of it being the great Jon reveal to sync with him being crowned KITN.
 
its pretty senseless, the title of that song :(
 
It is quite upbeat I suppose, wasn't expecting it myself.
 
It's typical of the Dany stuff they've done in most of the other seasons.
 
Reek 2016

qb0Enaa.gif
 
Purchased the soundtrack there yesterday and just finished it....bloody brilliant.

The Winds of Winter has a Mhysa vibe so I assume we're getting a Dany scene as the final one. Outside chance of it being the great Jon reveal to sync with him being crowned KITN.
More specifically, TWoW COMBINES [blackout]the Ironborn theme with Dany's theme, so if that scene is anything other than Dany & Co. sailing for Westeros, I'll be shocked[/blackout].
 
You seem to think the North is going to act like a bunch of rebels just because they are the North. The North swore fealty to the Iron Throne for generations, and were left alone, and did just fine. There is no reason to think Jon and the North wouldnt do the same again.

And no I dont think she wins easily, because I dont think Jon's going to put up a fight for independence. He doesnt need to if Dany treats the North like she intends to treat the Iron Islands.

And if Jon takes the throne then the North would have to swear fealty to him just like the rest of Westeros so it still wouldn't be independent.

Them marrying really doesnt make any difference.

Jon has no desire to rule at all imo. He just wants to stop the WW and for the north to be peaceful and safe. Littlefinger is the one who might be a problem. He wants the Iron Throne.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,273
Messages
22,078,384
Members
45,878
Latest member
Remembrance1988
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"