Tell that to SW fans in reference Darth Vader.![]()
Could it possibly be a line the same character uses often in the book?
You like hearing "Hulk Smash" on screen after reading it in text for years?
Well I don't know, which is why I was asking. The condescending tone isn't necessary.![]()
He was a deserter, he even says "I know I'm a deserter. I know I broke my oath."As I understood it, the ranger didn't deserted but fled from the WW and maybe warn the people.
Anyway, it wasn't a straight comparison of the two characters just my point of view on the "killings".
The Lannisters aren't royalty and twincest just makes it worse. I don't hate Jaime, but I don't give him a pass for the twincest.Hey, that sort of arrangement is not exactly out of the question for royalty. More importantly, they are twins (twincest anyone).
It's good. I actually did assume that, but I figured there may have been more to it than that with the reverence people had for the line.I'm sorry, I didn't mean it that way man. But the logical assumption
since quite a few of us were geeking out on it was that it was something we were waiting for. just like Hodor.
It wouldn't hurt for them to remind us that there is a threat beyond the Wall by showing one.
Did they say who is playing Ramsay yet?
I assume this season will end with Stannis launching a full-scale invasion on King's Landing.
I was under the impression if Tywin were to find out about Cersei and Jamie there would be hell to pay.
The whole Night's Watch thing is pretty silly. Just sitting there, waiting for something to happen. But, I assume once the bogeymen beyond the wall finally do make their move (probably circa season 11 at this rate), they'll finally get to do something.
It wouldn't hurt for them to remind us that there is a threat beyond the Wall by showing one.
Not to be rude but I disagree with Game of Thrones being an 'original show' in any sense of the phrase. It's a TV adaptation (moreover, it's one that sticks close to the source material) and thus by its very definition, a copy. Moreover, the show is often described as The Sopranos set in Middle Earth. Yes, it's a novel combination but not an original concept. It simply borrows from multiple sources.
Back to your question about why adapt and deviate. The benefit of this is that you gain the world-building, politics and history of the setting; plus the characters as how they first started out. Reinterpreting and deviating from the source provide people with something fresh and new, unpredictable twists, while still remaining familiar.
It is worth mentioning that every successful TV adaptation to date has taken this approach of deviating from the original source material. Sticking to the source material presents logistical issues, make it less enticing for higher caliber writers (who'd rather tell their own stories than someone else's) and makes one's twists and reveals fall flat since anyone who wants to find out what happens next can easily do so online. All this on top of the aforementioned scripting issues. Meanwhile, I can't think of any upsides of restricting oneself in this way. In other words, from a developmental standpoint, there's no benefit to sticking closely to the source material instead of picking and choosing what you want to use.
If they only have two episodes left, they better hurry.
Jamie pokes his sister...he is not the hero of the show.