As of episode 2 of season 2, she doesnt have any other interactions with himJust started in on season one. I'm on about episode 2 right now, and I've gotta ask....
Does Ned's wife ever stop being such a collossal ***** to Jon Snow?
oh wow, thanks. Can they really trust him then? This sounds like it screams of rebellion and betrayalRegarding Theon living with the Starks and the conversation about that...
Children were held hostage to ensure obedience and allegiance. Balon revolted when Robert was King. Stannis smashed the Iron Fleet and Ned ended up killing Theons 2 older brothers, ending the Rebellion and taking Theon at a young age to ensure Balons obedience.
Thing is, The Starks are honor bound to treat Theon according to his birthright - which is highborn. Theon is a prince. He would be educated, taught fighting skills, etc, and treated very well.
But he was still always a hostage no matter how close he eventually became with the Starks, like Robb.
This is talked about in the first season when Tyrion visits Winterfell and taunts Theon, calling him a Stark lackey and what would Balon Greyjoy think of his sons cozyness with the family who helped end his fathers rebellion.Theon warns Tyrion hes going too far in his taunts.
Just started in on season one. I'm on about episode 2 right now, and I've gotta ask....
Does Ned's wife ever stop being such a collossal ***** to Jon Snow?
It's explained better in the book. She walked up to him and let him treat her however he wanted--which for Theon was lust--and then played along. She wanted to see "what kind of man" her brother grew up to be. She was not impressed much with what she saw.
Bold mine.If Stannis and Mel produce a son he won't be a bastard. Remember, he's trying to establish a new reign. Its not a continuation of Robert's, it will be his. He can make anyone his queen he wishes and thus legitimize the child.
It's been 17 years. I think it's long since time for her to get the hell over it. Treating Jon like utter crap for something he didn't do (being born) and resenting a child is just low. I get where she's coming from but he is her children's brother and they love him as family. She should have tried to accept him at least for their sake. I don't think her contempt for Jon is justified
That actually wasn't uncommon in olden times, to pass off an illegitimate child as a legitimate. Hell, a lot of princes were probably just commoner babies a king and queen claimed to be their own.
But then in real life, virtually all nobles and royals had mistresses, and bastards, since most marriages were loveless charades. Hell, a king not having a mistress was seen as rather strange.
Well, I assumed from day one that Jon was meant to be someone special. Beyond the fact that they keep focusing on him, his birth remains a mystery, and the mystery has been discussed by Ned and Robert. If he was just an ordinary bastard son, I doubt that Ned and the King would be talking about it. And Ned doesn't seem like the type who would cheat on his wife.
I would assume he's someone important's son.
The actress was in the West End stage production of Childeren's Hour with Keira Knightley and Ellen Burstyn. I hate her character.And prosthetic breasts too
I don't know was he doing a Geordie accent?And I still don't know why Cunningham is doing a Geordie accent.
DACrowe pointed out that he'smore of a hostage than Ned's ward in season 1. There's also a couple other scenes from season 1. When Maester Luwin is going through house sigils and mottos, he gets to the Greyjoys. Theon says they're great at "sailing, archery, and love-making." Luwin just shoots back "and failed rebellions." This makes it clear that the Greyjoys are not thought of well among the Starks or other Westerosi. The other scene is when a wildling is holding a knife to Bran, Theon kills him from behind with his bow. Rather than thanking him for saving Bran's life, Robb chastises him that he could have killed Bran or missed all together.
He was too much of a Greyjoy to fit in with the Starks but the Ironmen think he's too much of a Stark to just be accepted from his return. He realizes soon.
I don't like Theon, but he's a really interesting character. In a world where people identify themselves by their families, he really has none that he truly belongs to.
It's explained better in the book. She walked up to him and let him treat her however he wanted--which for Theon was lust--and then played along. She wanted to see "what kind of man" her brother grew up to be. She was not impressed much with what she saw.
Yup. Continuing where you left off. The Iron Islands see themselves as tougher, hardier people than those freom Westeros. I always thought of the Iron Islands as sort of Greenland and such. Places with not much in the way of agricultuure so they depend upon the sea and pillaging. They are the Vikings of the show.
As for how Theon acted. They see the Westerosi as weak, lustfull, etc, because they have an easy life. Plus they have the coolest religion in all over GOT, they worship the Drowned God!
About that theory. I dont believe that makes a certain person legitimate....
I'm not so sure it legitimizes Jon. Rhaegar was married to Elia Martell. Having a child with Lyanna - Jon would still be a bastard, unless his marriage to Elia wa disolved and he married Lyanna in secret. We know Elia was sill alive during Roberts Rebellion. Even if he did divorce Elia, you can use HenryVIII as a example, and some would see Elia as the rightul Queen and refuse to recognize any offspring from Rhaegar and Lyanna.
Aegon has been hidden in Dorne all these years.
You'd basically have Daenerys, Aegon, and Jon Snow, but wouldnt Aegon actually be the legitimate heir, even over Daeny? He is the son of Rhaegar and Elia, so Daeny would be behind Aegon in the order of heir.
Am I getting that right or no?