I'll ask again. How come the poll was closed after 7 days of this movie's release?
I don't know I just thought it was going to be boring. I was like "oh she's stuck in space, whocares?" I should've trusted that the director of Children of Men would make a great film out of such a simple premise.Just curious, why weren't you interested in Gravity in the first place?
And I too, have Gravity and Place Beyond the Pines as my favorite 2013 movies I've seen so far.![]()

Good for, you want a cookie?I don't want to sound like some pretensions movie nerd but I really had complete confidence in this film simply down to the director in spite of its premise sounding boring. Frankly, there was never any reason to fear this being a bad or boring film, it was 6 years in the making, required new technology to be invented, and was coming off the back of Children of Men. The name Cuaron was all I needed to have faith in this film.
Pretentious ain't the word. Honestly the smug in this post is too much even for someone like me.Good for, you want a cookie?Pretentious ain't the word. Honestly the smug in this post is too much even for someone like me.
still the studio had to give him enough creative control and he had to listen to the studio. IMO
Cuaron wanted a movie without any music . and people who worked on the effects said that months ago they saw a different directors cut. Bullock didnt have a lot of lines.she was very quiet. so i would guess this movie is 90% Cuaron and 10 % studio( i give Cuaron brothers the credit for the story and idea how to make the movie. thats all them).
sometimes what is cliche or dumb stupid is what gives the movie the final touch to make it a masterpiece IMO.![]()
Good for, you want a cookie?Pretentious ain't the word. Honestly the smug in this post is too much even for someone like me.

